Rent Is Too Damn High Party panz******en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent_Is_Too_Damn_High_Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rent Is 2 Damn High Party
The Rent Is 2 Damn High Party is a political party in New York that has nominated candidates for mayor of New York City in 2005 and 2009 and for governor and senator in 2010. Jimmy McMillan was the mayoral candidate both times and a candidate for governor.[2] In 2005, he received more than 4,000 votes,[3] and more than 40,000 in 2010.[4] The party has three registered members in the state. McMillan himself is registered as a Republican (previously a Democrat) for the purposes of running in that party's primary elections.[5][6][7]
1. 我很喜欢你举的例子,不妨接着你的例子演绎下去。“如果一个大孩子在欺负一个矮他很多的小孩,你说保持中立。那你真的就中立吗?没有。”你说的完全正确!但是,这里只是假定了一种情况,而这种情况很可能是基于“小小孩”的一面之词。生活中不乏以小欺大,然后恶人先告状的情况。我的意见,即便是“小小孩”以小欺大,先动手了,大孩子在反击中伤了小小孩,伤势和责任一俟得到确证,我们依然要站在“小小孩”一边,依法惩处造成伤害的大小孩。这是起码的社会公义感。但是,还可能有另一种情况:确实是大孩子以大欺小,引起了公愤,围观人群愤怒谴责大孩子,越围越多,里边恰巧有位跟大孩子家有仇的大妈在竭尽煽动之能事,楞说大孩子草菅人命,企图活埋小小孩,还准备掏肝挖肺回去给他爹下酒。这就是恶性膨胀的“舆情”,totally out of proportion!原本大孩子的优势,现在变成了明显的劣势:一个大孩子面对一大群海内外成人,谣言,外加各种诬蔑不实之词不绝于耳。咱们的分歧就在这里:你依然无条件地站在围观群众一边,因为你始终确信大小孩是“强势”,小小孩是“弱势”,而且也看不出“有仇大妈”的指控有什么不对,甚至不知道那位大妈与大小孩家有仇。而我会立刻报警让警察把大孩子带走(这是对他最好的保护),由法庭依据客观调查结果做出裁决,还大小孩、小小孩一个公道。