简体 | 繁体
loading...
海外博客
    • 首页
    • 新闻
    • 读图
    • 财经
    • 教育
    • 家居
    • 健康
    • 美食
    • 时尚
    • 旅游
    • 影视
    • 博客
    • 群吧
    • 论坛
    • 电台
  • 热点
  • 原创
  • 时政
  • 旅游
  • 美食
  • 家居
  • 健康
  • 财经
  • 教育
  • 情感
  • 星座
  • 时尚
  • 娱乐
  • 历史
  • 文化
  • 社区
  • 帮助
您的位置: 文学城 » 博客 »Pfizer’s Failure in Good Cholesterol Doesn’t Doom Rivals

Pfizer’s Failure in Good Cholesterol Doesn’t Doom Rivals

2007-11-05 15:39:26

羽宁

羽宁
首页 文章页 文章列表 博文目录
给我悄悄话
打印 被阅读次数

Pfizer’s Failure in Good Cholesterol Doesn’t Doom Rivals

Posted by Nick Timiraos

nullResearchers shed a little more light on what went so badly wrong with Pfizer’s torcetrapib (pictured) during a presentation at the American Heart Association’s confab in Orlando.

Besides boosting HDL, or good, cholesterol levels, torcetrapib sharply increased risks of death during trials. Pfizer spiked the mammoth drug-development program last December after torcetrapib spurred an increase in deaths and heart problems in patients taking the drug in combination with Lipitor. The study of 15,000 patients, overseen by the Heart Research Institute in Sydney, saw risk of death increase by 58% and risks of heart attack or other heart problems increase by 25% in the combination therapy versus Lipitor alone.

What went haywire? Dr. Philip Barter, the institute’s lead researcher, suggested that torcetrapib boosted aldosterone, a hormone involved in the regulation of blood pressure. But he cautioned that still more research must be done to explain how that could have made the drug so unsafe.

Merck and Roche have been developing similar drugs, so-called CETP inhibitors, and had been awaiting details about torcetrapib. Steven Nissen, head of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic, told Bloomberg that torcetrapib “has a bizarre, off-target toxicity that caused it to produce harm and concealed the benefit” of raising good cholesterol. “Now there’s a race on,” he said. “We can get back on the horse and try again.”

An editorial in today’s New England Journal of Medicine warned against reading too much into the torcetrapib’s failure: “In any case, it is premature to announce the death of CETP inhibitors on the basis of the torcetrapib experience alone.”

Steve Ryder, Pfizer’s head of torcetrapib research and development, told Dow Jones Newswires: “There are many questions that still remain.”

And that burden will hang over the other experimental drugs that aim to raise good cholesterol as torcetrapib did. “The whole fiasco with torcetrapib means that we’re going to have to be even more cautious with any of its cousins before they come to market,” Sharonne Hayes, a cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic, told Bloomberg. “It’s going to be a much higher bar.”

登录后才可评论.
  • 文学城简介
  • 广告服务
  • 联系我们
  • 招聘信息
  • 注册笔名
  • 申请版主
  • 收藏文学城

WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.

Copyright ©1998-2025 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy

今日热点

  • 海外华人王同学30亩地
  • 当加拿大梦变成噩梦:一个中国家庭的四万加元教训?在路上的我
  • 妹妹悼念姐姐佩尼燕京人penny
  • 中国的稀土限制是张王牌吗?雅酷原创
  • 访友幸遇小暖男打魚船
  • 败而不亡——蒋介石特有的人生玄奥江天云月
  • 出国前后的日记对比:精彩回忆从出国那天开始SUDreamers
  • 上海博物馆青铜器的收藏堪称世界第一世界在我心中
  • 美国躺平:政府停摆关张 仇恨政治死结?| 川普时代-1风鸣拾夕
  • 中国社会各阶层分析和黑暗森林的火种李承鹏
  • “我爱你”,一句难以说出口的话远远的雾
  • 那些年,那些人,那些事(四)yefang
  • 一双新鞋萬魚侯
  • 免费咨询李文亮的儿子留美雅美之途

一周热点

  • 中美洗牙体验对比:从误解到赞叹,来中国看牙医很可行fubin
  • 民主的陷阱越吃越蒙山人
  • 来到加拿大的印度城:明白了为什么印度人砸锅卖铁也要移民加拿大SUDreamers
  • 中台相似的经济发展模式; 政改...BeijingGirl1
  • 喜新厌旧是我沁在骨髓里面的执着mychina
  • 美国百姓点评川普未获诺贝尔和平奖老X
  • 爱与责任多伦多橄榄树
  • 从股市暴跌想到:芒格的智慧徐徐道来
  • 那些关于公平,友谊和努力的谎言世事沧桑
  • 写给我最怀念的闺蜜凯西的VC
  • 大学毕业40年同学聚会杂感憨大头
  • 柴火炉子,小米煎饼:农村没文化的婆婆,值得我尊敬(2)明了的土垚
  • 从吃鱼看中外文化对比慕容青草
  • 实现你的“美国梦”, 到底值多少钱?菲儿天地
Pfizer’s Failure in...
切换到网页版
羽宁

羽宁

Pfizer’s Failure in Good Cholesterol Doesn’t Doom Rivals

羽宁 (2007-11-05 15:39:26) 评论 (2)

Pfizer’s Failure in Good Cholesterol Doesn’t Doom Rivals

Posted by Nick Timiraos

nullResearchers shed a little more light on what went so badly wrong with Pfizer’s torcetrapib (pictured) during a presentation at the American Heart Association’s confab in Orlando.

Besides boosting HDL, or good, cholesterol levels, torcetrapib sharply increased risks of death during trials. Pfizer spiked the mammoth drug-development program last December after torcetrapib spurred an increase in deaths and heart problems in patients taking the drug in combination with Lipitor. The study of 15,000 patients, overseen by the Heart Research Institute in Sydney, saw risk of death increase by 58% and risks of heart attack or other heart problems increase by 25% in the combination therapy versus Lipitor alone.

What went haywire? Dr. Philip Barter, the institute’s lead researcher, suggested that torcetrapib boosted aldosterone, a hormone involved in the regulation of blood pressure. But he cautioned that still more research must be done to explain how that could have made the drug so unsafe.

Merck and Roche have been developing similar drugs, so-called CETP inhibitors, and had been awaiting details about torcetrapib. Steven Nissen, head of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic, told Bloomberg that torcetrapib “has a bizarre, off-target toxicity that caused it to produce harm and concealed the benefit” of raising good cholesterol. “Now there’s a race on,” he said. “We can get back on the horse and try again.”

An editorial in today’s New England Journal of Medicine warned against reading too much into the torcetrapib’s failure: “In any case, it is premature to announce the death of CETP inhibitors on the basis of the torcetrapib experience alone.”

Steve Ryder, Pfizer’s head of torcetrapib research and development, told Dow Jones Newswires: “There are many questions that still remain.”

And that burden will hang over the other experimental drugs that aim to raise good cholesterol as torcetrapib did. “The whole fiasco with torcetrapib means that we’re going to have to be even more cautious with any of its cousins before they come to market,” Sharonne Hayes, a cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic, told Bloomberg. “It’s going to be a much higher bar.”