Well, I do admit that I don't have "先入为主的判断力" 'cause I don't like "先入为主" as a part of my judgement on any events, especially historical events.
What is "先入为主"?
I think your know better. It's bias... some concepts or ideas rooted deeply in your mind that you just can't get rid of easily. If you have used this type of "判断力", your judgement/decision will be skewed from the beginning. No matter how hard you "在这几年外边混网上混加上同白人的讨论得来的观点".
You said "如果你没有先入为主的判断力，那么我现在的回答希望对你有用". My answer to you is yes. Your answer is useful to me 'cause I now again confirms that "先入为主" is indeed a dangerous thing to our mind. Discrimination and hate all starts from it.
至於你至今还在狡辩什么“听到的消息(伊拉克记者被放)也许是在进入正式法律程序之前的事”，就更加无耻。你为何不能把你“曾经被放”的REFERENCE查出呢？谎言就是谎言，OK？墨写的谎言，掩盖不了血写的事实。本大侠已经以REFERENCE教过你了：“He's been in custody ever since, even as everyday Iraqis declared him a hero for his act. ”你怎么还有脸叨叨什么“听到的消息(伊拉克记者被放)也许是在进入正式法律程序之前的事”。知道不知道什么是”in custody ever since“。
至於你声称“下次你尽管写什么打断好几根肋骨被关押之类”，你真以为伊拉克记者在狱中很幸福？本大侠已经以REFERENCE教过你了：“ His family claims he's been tortured.”REFER：http://www.kansascity.com/451/story/1024103.html
TO：Jessey08
Jessey08说别人是“n个不懂装懂的留学小混混转战这里”。自己却是在论坛里造谣，撒谎。Jessey08在“干扰温家宝演讲”的THREAD评论里造谣道：“只想说，应该以事实来讲道理，’该伊拉克记者现在被打残并被关在监狱里‘ 事实上在美国政府的督促下，该名记者早就被释放了。为什么你要这样说呢？ ”而事实刚刚与Jessey08的谎言相反，该伊拉克记者仍被关押。REFER：http://www.kansascity.com/451/story/1024103.
html “Shoe-throwing Iraqi journalist faces Feb. 19 trial”“judicial spokesman Abdel Sattar Beyraqdar said. Conviction could lead to a 15-year prison sentence.
”“He's been in custody ever since, even as everyday Iraqis declared him a hero for his act. His family claims he's been tortured.”
My friend, I understand your point. But I just want to ask you one thing:
When was the last time you study,or try to know more, on the wars like 韩战,印战,越战? Or your impression on these wars is just simply from the old high school textbooks? Or slogans?
I believe you are a person of "有文化也会思考". But I just want to emphasize that our judgement on anything are affected by the education we received. And that education sits deeply in our mind and affects us subconsciously. To me, the only way of getting a full picture on any historical event is to study the event from different aspects. One-sided story always worries me.
StraightBall 发表评论于
回复风雨阳关的评论:
"I admire that you could speak perfect Chinglish. But, at least, ""ignorance + disgusting attitude" accord with your personality.Thanks for your opportunity to let me showing you how to write comment in English (not Chinglish). By the way ,"attitude" is not "attitute", even though you really need to grow up."
First of all, I just want to tell you that I use English to communicate 'cause I don't have the Chinese characters installed in my computer. I'm still working on it.
Well, your comment on me really shows what a narrow-minded person you are. I just typed one letter wrong and that's become the "Chinglish" to you. But honestly I found more errors in your comments. Just read your own comment again. The grammar is all wrong.
Did you see my point? Read my previous comments again. I wasn't placing my previous comments on the issue of people's capability on written English. It's all about the discussion of this article. You try to divert it to something irrelevant, it's just not gonna work.
By the way, you should know better that Chinglish is a discriminative word against us Chinese. I'm surprised that you use it with ease in your comment.
回复StraightBall的评论:
I admire that you could speak perfect Chinglish. But, at least, ""ignorance + disgusting attitude" accord with your personality.Thanks for your opportunity to let me showing you how to write comment in English (not Chinglish). By the way ,"attitude" is not "attitute", even though you really need to grow up.
风雨阳关 发表评论于
TO :StraightBall I admire that you could speak perfect Chinglish. But, at least, ""ignorance + disgusting attitude" accord with your personality.Thanks for your opportunity to let me showing you how to write comment in English (not Chinglish). By the way ,"attitude" is not "attitute", even though you really need to grow up.
回复minnielala的评论:
Correction--it's "Confucius" instead of "Confucian's".
Sorry!
minnielala 发表评论于
回复jellyman的评论:
It's also called the Golden Rule.
Hope it helps.
minnielala 发表评论于
回复jellyman的评论:
It's called the Confucian's rule, which goes like,
"do unto others as you would have it done to you", or
"do to others as you would have done to you"
... You're welcome :)
阿健 发表评论于
告诉美国人、尤其是白人、整个美国才是真正的西藏、印第安人才是真正的藏民。
我对白人的虚伪和白痴特别不耐烦。
fullmoon100 发表评论于
说得好呀。本小姐也是经常与美国“鬼子”辩论得天翻地覆。外国媒体早把外国人给洗脑的离谱。好样的！！！
jellyman 发表评论于
请问“己所不欲，勿施于人”是怎么译的？
谢了
haikuotiankong 发表评论于
回复明夷的评论:
If I understand you correctly, China needs to offer the land to the countries where invaded China such as India and Vietnam. Jin is the nation where started the fight and later concurred the whole China. It's not some kind of good bird as you described. Eight western allies invaded China and you even didn't mention it. If China would not have fought to protect itself, it wouldn’t have existed today. You, as a Taiwanese, need to recall your sole as a Chinese because you stand too far from your own ancestors. Other fightings you mentioned were all civil wars that had nothing to do with the invading.
thrawn 发表评论于
in the end the truth come from Korean: 拳头就是真理 when all other words ran out.
Thank you for understanding my point. We all want China to be strong and prosperous, but we also have to know that history is always written by people with different purposes. The more you read from different aspects the better picture you can get on historical events. God bless you.
I like your PREVIOUS articles but I'm disappointed with this one. I think you're brain-washed too much by the government. What you have said sounds like slogans to me. I don't think you will earn the respect from your co-workers by your argument. You should study more about modern Chinese history, from different aspects."
Thank you StraightBall, I will try. Thanks for the comments.
虔谦 发表评论于
回复aacdeffagg的评论:
Thank you aacdeffagg for the sharing. I am in the process of studying and learning myself. I just cannot help to say something when i heard the Korean co-worker said things like that.
You guys are really disgusting and ignorant. Ignorance is fine, but "ignorance + disgusting attitute" is a problem. Especially to you, 不搞笑, you really need to grow up.
I agree with you. It seems some comments here (like the one from "秒秒") are from those who only like to reveive/accept the information from the government and never try to study more aboout the history.
I like your PREVIOUS articles but I'm disappointed with this one. I think you're brain-washed too much by the government. What you have said sounds like slogans to me. I don't think you will earn the respect from your co-workers by your argument. You should study more about modern Chinese history, from different aspects.
cooldw57 发表评论于
中国侵略过的还蛮多的，现代有越南，南韩，西藏（不完全算国家，但是也算是independent entity)，中国，过去清唐汉强大的时候也干过，就算很烂的明朝也在朝鲜和日本干过。当然侵略不一定是贬义词，诺曼底登陆也被美国叫做 The Invasion of Normandy, 只要不是在自己国土打都应该算上。
lz is sooooooooooooooooooo naive. i do not think your co-worker will respect you. have your own brain instead of others told you. you should know you are grown up, not a baby. another explain is you really do not have talent in political. give your advise that do not talk political issuses with others anymore, otherwise you will lose your face everywhere and you are not aware of that. must remember this, that is good for you. everyone is good at something but not good at something. that is not your fault, but you should aware of that.
