据中新网巴黎最新消息, 法国佳士得拍卖行二十五日晚间在巴黎拍卖中国
圆明园流失文物鼠首和兔首铜像，两个兽首分别以一千四百万欧元的价格
被一电话买家买走，总价约为二亿元人民币。这两件古董是在一八六0年
第二次鸦片战争期间被英法联军劫掠走并流失海外多年的中国圆明园流失
文物。
中国外交部发言人反复强调了中方反对拍卖圆明园流失文物之立场。
中国国家文物局相关负责人曾致函佳士得公司正式表明强烈反对其拍卖
圆明园文物的原则立场，并明确要求撤拍有关文物。
由中国近百人组成的律师团也发起追讨行动，并由法国执业律师、旅法
华人任晓红及其合伙人代表欧洲保护中华艺术联合会于二月十九日向法
国巴黎大审法院提出了要求停止圆明园流失文物鼠首兔首铜像拍卖的诉
讼请求。巴黎大审法院紧急审理法庭二十三日傍晚作出裁决，驳回了此
项诉讼请求。
北京圆明园管理处也发表申明，对于历史上被掠夺到海外的文物，中国
对其拥有不可质疑的所有权；不赞同圆明园流散文物进入拍卖市场，也
不赞同以“回购”方式买回被别人“掠走”的中国珍贵文物。这些文物
理应归还中国，回到它的“原生地”。
国际媒体也曾报道的“圆明园兽首”持有人皮埃尔·贝尔热对新闻界发
言：“我准备把这对“圆明园兽首”直接交给中国，中国所需要做的，
则是宣布准备实行人权，归还西藏人民的自由权利，并欢迎达赖喇嘛
回到西藏。如果中国做到了这一点，我会很高兴的亲自把这对“圆明
园兽首”带到中国，并将他们安装回颐和园。我这么说很显然是一种
威胁，这点我承认。”
皮埃尔·贝尔热系法国著名的实业家和文化赞助人，巴黎YSL商场的共
同创建人，YSL（圣罗兰）服饰品牌的合伙人。从1992年起担任联合
国教科文组织的亲善大使。
好了，各位读者一定对这桩拍卖案的尘埃落定有所感慨了吧。两亿元
的大交易呀，总是有人得，有人失吧。山哥不妨俗气一点，分析分析
有关方面的损失和受益情况。
佳士得一定获得了一笔可观的佣金。
法国政府也得到了一笔可观的税金。
皮埃尔·贝尔热先生可能是自觉最得意的聪明人：他可谓名利双收哟。
不但获得了拍卖的巨额收入，而且还充分标榜了自己文化名人，正义
之士的英雄本色。
轮运独人士也发自内心的欢呼，你看那个万维网逢中必反的记者傅某，
那是如沫春风般的得意呀。
中国政府是不是颜面输尽，人财两空？表面看来，绝对如此。
可是山哥细细想来，事情并非如此。很可能是恰恰相反。
没错，这桩拍卖案中最受伤害的是绝大多数海内外华人同胞的民族
感情和尊严。英法联军洗劫，火烧圆明园，是中国近代史上最惨痛
的一页。皮埃尔·贝尔热和他们法兰西强盗先辈一样，既傲慢，又自
大，根本不把中国人和其他第三世界的民族利益和尊严当作一回事。
他们这种自作聪明的行为，半个多世纪以来，已经在中南半岛，北
非，西非等地屡遭痛击，庞大的法兰西殖民帝国早就土崩瓦解。
甚至法国殖民者的本土，也遭到大批前殖民地的亚非人民的逆向殖
民。近年发生在巴黎伊斯兰社区青年的暴动闹事，就是这些殖民主
义者最好的报应。
是的，中共政权并非民主政权，中国的人权也大有改进的余地。可
是到底是中共还是皮埃尔·贝尔热等法国佬甚或达赖等独轮运人士
目前能够代表中国人的利益，各方面的所作所为已经充分说明了问
题。
感谢皮埃尔·贝尔热式洋教师，他们的充分表演不断激发中国人的民
族主义情绪。本来在意识形态领域一筹莫展的中国当局，有了免费
的爱国主义好教师。
依附于这些西方反华实力的少数中国反对派人士，也自觉不自觉地
走到了13亿人民的对立面。
山哥有理由相信，在这多事之秋，恰恰是中国政府，成为了企图借
天价拍卖名利双收的法国蠢货们导演的大交易中的最大受益者。
圆明园鼠首兔首铜像天价拍卖案的真正受益者
wolaishuo 发表评论于
“为了民族尊严，我们可以不守信用。”
熊培云 @ 2009-3-3 10:16 评论(8) 推荐(47) 引用通告 分类: 时评
昨日，培云接到北青天慰兄的电话，问是否可就蔡铭超竞拍圆明园兽首一事撰写评论。因出门在外，不便撰文，不过还是有几句话可说。
其一，中国人的信用已经是很差了，不只是国内信用，还包括国际信用。而这一拍卖事件的负作用是给中国人不守信用做活广告。
二，蔡铭超说不付钱，背后的逻辑是“为了尊严，我们可以不守信用。”培云认为，一个人或一个国家，守不守信用，其实是很关乎尊严的。而“兴，百姓苦，亡，百姓苦”，也在于失信。
三，世界需要契约，世界各地的“圆明园”就是在契约失效之前提下被烧被抢的。
——思想国·21世纪评论
熊培云 @ 2009-3-3 10:16 评论(8) 推荐(47) 引用通告 分类: 时评
昨日，培云接到北青天慰兄的电话，问是否可就蔡铭超竞拍圆明园兽首一事撰写评论。因出门在外，不便撰文，不过还是有几句话可说。
其一，中国人的信用已经是很差了，不只是国内信用，还包括国际信用。而这一拍卖事件的负作用是给中国人不守信用做活广告。
二，蔡铭超说不付钱，背后的逻辑是“为了尊严，我们可以不守信用。”培云认为，一个人或一个国家，守不守信用，其实是很关乎尊严的。而“兴，百姓苦，亡，百姓苦”，也在于失信。
三，世界需要契约，世界各地的“圆明园”就是在契约失效之前提下被烧被抢的。
——思想国·21世纪评论
釉色 发表评论于
by the way, China is the biggest supporter of Khmer Rouge. Yes, that show the world China really love peace
釉色 发表评论于
cannot type chinese now, but you are right, not against soviet union, but soviet union back force and the world believe China lost this stupid war.
釉色 发表评论于
65533;65533;65533;65533;clinton-2007?蝶阶:
PRC vs. Vietnam: Third Indochina War
The neutrality of this section is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page. (February 2008)
Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved.
Where the first war emerged from the complex situation following WWII and the second exploded from the unresolved aftermath of political relations with the first, the Third Indochina War again followed the unsolved problems of the earlier wars. The fact remains that: "Peace did not come to Indochina with either American 1973 withdrawal or Hanoi's 1975 victory" as disputes erupted over Cambodia and relations with China.[15]
The PRC, now under Deng Xiaoping, was growing increasingly defiant, and Deng Xiaoping was speaking to American president Jimmy Carter during Deng's brief visit to the USA:It's time to smack the bottom of unruly little children(Original Chinese words:小朋友不32884;话,该打打屁股了).[16] The USSR felt that there was simply no way that they could directly support Vietnam against the PRC; the distances were too great to be an effective ally, and any sort of reinforcements would have to cross territory controlled by the PRC or U.S. allies. The only realistic option would be to indirectly re-start the simmering border war with China in the north; Vietnam was important to Soviet policy but not enough for the Soviets to go to war over.
On February 15, 1979 the PRC publicly announced their intention to strike back the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia. Few observers realized the symbolic importance of this date. In an attempt to disrupt Vietnam, PRC snipers killed Vietnamese soldiers[citation needed] along the Chinese-Vietnamese border. It marked the expiration of the 30-year-old 1950 Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance, and thus the first time that the PRC could strike back at a Soviet ally without breaking their own treaties. The reason cited for the counter strike was the supposed mistreatment of Vietnam's ethnic Chinese minority and the Vietnamese occupation of the Spratly Islands (claimed by the PRC).
[edit] Chinese Forces
Two days later, on February 17, a PRC force of about 200,000 supported by 200 Type 59, Type 62, and Type 63 tanks from the PRC People's Liberation Army entered northern Vietnam.[17] The Chinese force consisted of units from the Kunming Military Region (later abolished), Chengdu Military Region, Wuhan Military Region (later abolished) and Guangzhou Military Region, but commanded by the headquarters of Kunming Military Region on the western front and Guangzhou Military Region in the eastern front. Some troops engaged in this war, especially engineering units, railway corps, logistical units and antiaircraft units, had been assigned to assist Vietnam in its struggle against the United States just a few years earlier during the Vietnam War. Contrary to the belief that over 600,000 Chinese troops entered Vietnam, the actual number was only 200,000. However, 600,000 Chinese troops were mobilized, of which 200,000 were deployed away from their original bases.[citation needed] Around 400 tanks (specifically Type 59s) were also deployed. The Chinese troop deployments were observed by US spy satellites, and the KH-9 Big Bird photographic reconnaissance satellite played an important role.[citation needed] In his state visit to the US in 1979, the Chinese paramount leader Deng Xiaoping was presented with this information and asked to confirm the numbers. He replied that the information was completely accurate. After this public confirmation in the U.S., the domestic Chinese media were finally allowed to report on these deployments.[citation needed]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Indochina_War
PRC vs. Vietnam: Third Indochina War
The neutrality of this section is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page. (February 2008)
Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved.
Where the first war emerged from the complex situation following WWII and the second exploded from the unresolved aftermath of political relations with the first, the Third Indochina War again followed the unsolved problems of the earlier wars. The fact remains that: "Peace did not come to Indochina with either American 1973 withdrawal or Hanoi's 1975 victory" as disputes erupted over Cambodia and relations with China.[15]
The PRC, now under Deng Xiaoping, was growing increasingly defiant, and Deng Xiaoping was speaking to American president Jimmy Carter during Deng's brief visit to the USA:It's time to smack the bottom of unruly little children(Original Chinese words:小朋友不32884;话,该打打屁股了).[16] The USSR felt that there was simply no way that they could directly support Vietnam against the PRC; the distances were too great to be an effective ally, and any sort of reinforcements would have to cross territory controlled by the PRC or U.S. allies. The only realistic option would be to indirectly re-start the simmering border war with China in the north; Vietnam was important to Soviet policy but not enough for the Soviets to go to war over.
On February 15, 1979 the PRC publicly announced their intention to strike back the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia. Few observers realized the symbolic importance of this date. In an attempt to disrupt Vietnam, PRC snipers killed Vietnamese soldiers[citation needed] along the Chinese-Vietnamese border. It marked the expiration of the 30-year-old 1950 Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship and Alliance, and thus the first time that the PRC could strike back at a Soviet ally without breaking their own treaties. The reason cited for the counter strike was the supposed mistreatment of Vietnam's ethnic Chinese minority and the Vietnamese occupation of the Spratly Islands (claimed by the PRC).
[edit] Chinese Forces
Two days later, on February 17, a PRC force of about 200,000 supported by 200 Type 59, Type 62, and Type 63 tanks from the PRC People's Liberation Army entered northern Vietnam.[17] The Chinese force consisted of units from the Kunming Military Region (later abolished), Chengdu Military Region, Wuhan Military Region (later abolished) and Guangzhou Military Region, but commanded by the headquarters of Kunming Military Region on the western front and Guangzhou Military Region in the eastern front. Some troops engaged in this war, especially engineering units, railway corps, logistical units and antiaircraft units, had been assigned to assist Vietnam in its struggle against the United States just a few years earlier during the Vietnam War. Contrary to the belief that over 600,000 Chinese troops entered Vietnam, the actual number was only 200,000. However, 600,000 Chinese troops were mobilized, of which 200,000 were deployed away from their original bases.[citation needed] Around 400 tanks (specifically Type 59s) were also deployed. The Chinese troop deployments were observed by US spy satellites, and the KH-9 Big Bird photographic reconnaissance satellite played an important role.[citation needed] In his state visit to the US in 1979, the Chinese paramount leader Deng Xiaoping was presented with this information and asked to confirm the numbers. He replied that the information was completely accurate. After this public confirmation in the U.S., the domestic Chinese media were finally allowed to report on these deployments.[citation needed]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Indochina_War
clinton-2007 发表评论于
回复釉色的评论:
历史真够差的，中国和俄国90年代在什么地方打过仗?
你是湾湾吧?
历史真够差的，中国和俄国90年代在什么地方打过仗?
你是湾湾吧?
釉色 发表评论于
连身为华人的李光耀，到了今天， 对中国都是持怀疑的态度，难道，一句中国穷所以被人歧视就可以解决问题了吗
难道中国人没有问过自己吗
难道中国人没有问过自己吗
釉色 发表评论于
其实我很好奇， 中国人到底有没有问过自己， 为什么中国在世界没有多少盟友。 有的， 几乎全是敌人。 中国身边各国， 讨厌中国至极。 新加坡的李光耀， 都把兵送到台湾去训练。 连所谓中国最坚强盟友俄罗斯， 90年代还跟中国打过仗。 难道， 一句全世界都歧视中国大陆人就解决了你们的疑问吗
你们真的相信， 中国政府爱好和平， 从不参与他国事务吗？？？
你们真的相信， 中国政府爱好和平， 从不参与他国事务吗？？？
釉色 发表评论于
你看人家殖民主义， 世界看中国共产党建国前四十年， 比殖民主义还不如。 中国人这前四十多年来， 害死国外多少条人命呀。
还有给那些说我造谣羞辱中国的人， 去美国各个大学的历史系抗议比较实际
还有给那些说我造谣羞辱中国的人， 去美国各个大学的历史系抗议比较实际
jigjig 发表评论于
回复啊哟的评论: "我不觉得我自己的尊严和那两个玩意儿
有什么关系。"-----Are U a Lun-Lun? Du-Du? or Yun-Yun, please??
有什么关系。"-----Are U a Lun-Lun? Du-Du? or Yun-Yun, please??
啊哟 发表评论于
我不觉得我自己的尊严和两个满清皇帝的私家花园水龙头有什么关系。
你要是觉得你的尊严和那两个玩意儿有关系，那好，我不表示意见。但你无权把所有海外华人都扯上，因为你没有这个授权。
你要是觉得你的尊严和那两个玩意儿有关系，那好，我不表示意见。但你无权把所有海外华人都扯上，因为你没有这个授权。
来此一聚 发表评论于
sorry, overprice!
来此一聚 发表评论于
definitely over prices!
登录后才可评论.
