社會公德和規矩的核心
已有 390 次閱讀 2015-8-19 09:39 |個人分類:Core value|係統分類:博客資訊
社會公德和規矩後麵，有個核心(2015-08-19 10:37:52)下一個
Note:
承認個人的利益，是社會發展的動力；尊重別人的利益，是社會穩定的基礎。
老的說法將這歸因於為人，性格決定命運；時尚的解釋叫情商。為人也好，情商也好，其實後麵都是同一個核心的東西：即感知並尊重別人利益的能力，其它的很多東西，都是虛的玄的。我們常說要尊重別人，但到底什麽是尊重？
“己所不欲，勿施於人”，實質就是換位思考、尊重別人的利益。"(by 徐罡博士)
*** Add-on note for my posts: 各位有缘人【总之就是正在看着屏幕的您！】，[em:3:] blessings! “己所不欲，勿施於人”，實質就是換位思考、尊重別人的利益 = decency。(I wrote all my posts based on what I read on line, a way of taking break, a routine of daily activity. I can't write anything without this fabric of other's writing, an inspiration that triggers my own motivation to write. Copy/paste the original article provides me with a context to track down where I got the idea, a way to credit back to those writers. “己所不欲，勿施於人”，實質就是換位思考、尊重別人的利益 - You're free to quote my writing. If you're objected to my quotation, can you let me know so I can correct it? Thanks.
Reference: I'd credit the original source of my inspiration to write this post by citing the entire article above, only for academic/teaching purpose, but not for commercial purpose - making and promoting any products. I use both URL (URL is an acronym for Uniform Resource Locator and is a reference (an address) to a resource on the Internet. A URL has two main components: Protocol identifier: For the URL http://example.com , the protocol identifier is http . Resource name: For the URL http://example.com , the resource name is example.com .) and the entire article for my electronic library as URL is drifted with time, so it's hard to find the original citation. Let me know if you're objected to my citation of your article - I'd act accordingly. Thanks so much for your attention.
*** all my blog posts align with 唐師曾 on this: "無計劃、無腹稿，每天拍攝，即興亂侃。短兵相接講人的故事，隨拍隨說客觀記錄，是為“語像”。無立場、無判決。漏洞百出，歡迎補漏。作為新聞記者，我獲取的信息簡單處理後，以新聞的特點、速度即刻傳播。不計時間成本地對某個問題深入研究，不是我的本職工作。"- 唐師曾
~~~
A common problem with many Chinese Language websites
In re-reading some of my older blog articles, I have found the following problem with many Chinese language websites. When my article gave reference to material associated with my article, e.g., a website, the Chinese website do not archive old news reports. Instead one finds the website referenced has new stories featured that has nothing to do with my article. The old article referenced by me has disappeared and nowhere to be found. There is nothing I can do about this. On the other hand, international news sites such as CNN or NY Times has a distinct reference for each page of content featured. Reader can always see it even if the content is ten years old. I hope ScienceNet reader and the general public can urge these Chinese websites to change their practice. After all, these days computer memory to a first approximation cost nothing.
轉載本文請聯係原作者獲取授權，同時請注明本文來自何毓琦科學網博客。
鏈接地址：http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1565-1029741.html
http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-847277-914353.html
上一篇：[轉載]尊重別人，但到底什麽是尊重？
下一篇：[轉載]美國頂尖大學的人品教育
3 尤明慶 張憶文 曾傑
發表評論 評論 (3 個評論)
基督教 answered three basic questions: Who am I? Where I come from? Where I will go? All others couldn't answer these three questions. Can you explain how 道家、儒家和釋家 answer these three questions. That's the root of Chinese bureaucracy and official corruption.
基尼係數（Gini Coefficient）是意大利經濟學家基尼（Corrado Gini）於1922年提出的，已是國際上用來綜合考察居民收入分配差異程度的一個重要分析指標。基尼係數值在0和1之間，越接近0表明收入分配越平等，越接近1表明收入分配越是趨向不平等。
按照國際標準，0.4作為收入分配差距的“警戒線”，高於0.4表明社會不安定。北京大學中國社會科學調查中心2014年7月25日發布《中國民生發展報告2014》，顯示中國貧富分化極其嚴重。
中國家庭淨財產的基尼係數1995年為 0.45，2002年為0.55，2012年達到0.73，富裕的1%的家庭佔有全國1／3以上的財產，貧窮的25%的家庭擁有的財產總量僅有1%左右。相當大的一部分人民不聊生，而權貴們則富可敵國。
- See more at: http://news.creaders.net/china/2015/06/09/1541344.html#sthash.E5m3DNHJ.dpuf更多精彩點擊：http://www.creaders.net
- 刪除 回複 [3]曾傑
2015-8-20 17:20 - 你的問題提得很好，我思考過；所以，才得出一個結論，單純複興儒釋道不足以解決當今社會存在的弊端，單純依靠基督教也容易出現偏差，而這個根本點來自《聖經》（世界上最難讀懂或少有人讀懂）內在的精神。
- 博主回複(2015-8-21 10:41)：《毛澤東文選》26卷301頁有這樣一段話：“我們共產黨人，是從批孔起家的，但是我們決不能走前麵他們的路，批了再尊，等到我們為了鞏固自己的地位再把孔子的思想拿來給予老百姓，落入曆史的一種循環，這是不行的。如果共產黨也到了沒法統治或者遇到難處了，也要把孔子請回來，說明你也快完了。" Do you know why? That's because "道家、儒家和釋家的哲學詮釋 is different from 基督教. 基督教 answered three basic questions: Who am I? Where I come from? Where I will go? All others couldn't answer these three questions. Can you explain how 道家、儒家和釋家 answer these three questions. That's the root of Chinese bureaucracy and official corruption.
- 刪除 回複 [2]曾傑
2015-8-19 16:29 - 1）基督教自古以來，就有不同的哲學詮釋和不同的組織模式，形成不同的教派和教宗；
2）伊斯蘭教在中國，就是一個以儒學詮釋的成功典範；
3）基督教的3位1體，可以分別對應道家、儒家和釋家的哲學詮釋“方法”或“理解”模式 - 不是簡單的一一對應相關經典條文。 - 博主回複(2015-8-20 11:19)：You're the only one who got the root of my post; at least no other readers showed in writing.
道家、儒家和釋家的哲學詮釋 is different from 基督教. 基督教 answered three basic questions: Who am I? Where I come from? Where I will go? All others couldn't answer these three questions. Can you explain how 道家、儒家和釋家 answer these three questions. That's the root of Chinese bureaucracy and official corruption. Don't you think so?
- 刪除 回複 [1]曾傑
2015-8-19 10:15 - 自宗教改革到啟蒙運動以來，以儒家和道家哲學詮釋基督教，可能已經是一個發展方向。
這要深入研究舊約史料和儒家典籍，可以看到在猶太文化和儒家文化的起源，可能存在曆史的淵源，而印度宗教與希臘神話也存在故事模式的相關聯。
因而，基督教的儒釋道詮釋，可能是未來的研究方向。 - 博主回複(2015-8-19 10:45)：儒家: “己所不欲，勿施於人”; 基督教: "己所欲，施於人". Both have different perspectives - Your insight is well received - hope we can see more of that 基督教的儒釋道詮釋. Convergence of 基督教的儒釋道詮釋 and 儒家和道家哲學詮釋基督教 needs to find a middle ground to be useful, practically guide the public.
