Please Remove "Silver Fillings" ASAP!
含水银的补牙材料，在你夜晚磨牙、白天刷牙、吃东西、打磨牙齿、补牙时，会产生高浓度的水银蒸气（比一般职场监管的浓度要高得多），多数会被吸入体内，对身体产生危害。
小心含水银补牙材料让你患病
据英国《独立报》29日报道，2012年FDA一改以往汞齐补牙无害的立场，在其官方网站发布警告：“补牙用材料汞齐含有水银成分，可能对发育中的儿童和胎儿的神经系统产生毒害作用。”
FDA认为，汞齐在补牙过程中填充或取出以及用汞齐补过的牙齿咀嚼时，均会释放对人体有害的水银蒸气。FDA正在检讨先前制定的有关补牙材料规定，预计今后可能限制或禁止使用汞齐。
汞齐是补牙的常见材料。仅在欧盟每年就耗用125吨汞齐。挪威和丹麦已宣布禁止使用水银和汞齐补牙。瑞典、芬兰和日本已对汞齐补牙做出严格限制。
水银是金属汞的俗称，汞与其他金属形成的合金称为汞齐或汞合金。汞具有毒性，严重汞中毒会致人死亡，长期低剂量的汞污染也会对人的神经系统造成伤害。
-------
银汞作为充填材料应用于临床已逾100年了。
While the use of mercury-free fillings, such as tooth-colored composite resins and ceramics, are becoming more prevalent and better performing, approximately 46% dentists in the United States still use mercury-containing dental amalgam. Since the Civil War, mercury-containing fillings (often called “silver” or “amalgam”) continue to be used extensively to fill dental cavities. A 2006 poll of 2,590 US adults found that 72% of respondents were not aware that mercury was a main component of dental amalgam, and 92% of respondents would prefer to be told about mercury in dental amalgam before receiving it as a filling. This could be compared to being given a drug today by a pharmacy without the mandated FDA prescribing information (contents, possible side effects, etc.). Unfortunately, many dentists continue to place mercury-containing fillings, with many patients remaining uninformed of its mercury content.
Toxic Teeth: Are Amalgam Fillings Safe? | The Dr. Oz Show
http://www.doctoroz.com/article/toxic-teeth-are-our-amalgam-fillings-safe?
The Dental Fillings Cover-Up and the FDA
http://www.peoplespharmacy.com/2015/07/27/the-dental-fillings-cover-up-and-the-fda/?
FDA considered restricting dental fillings with mercury amalgam, but the proposal was squelched by Health & Human Services. What's the story?
Did you know that the FDA proposed restricting mercury amalgam dental fillings back in 2011? If that comes as a surprise, don’t feel bad. We didn’t know about it either, and we pay close attention to such things.
According to an investigative report by Greg Gordon for McClatchy Newspapers,
“Senior U.S. health officials have squelched a Food and Drug Administration proposal that for the first time would have curbed dentists’ use of mercury – one of the planet’s nastiest toxins because it attacks the central nervous system – in treating Americans’ decayed teeth.”
The People‘s Pharmacy & Silver Fillings
Over 25 years ago we were concerned enough about the potential toxicity of mercury amalgam dental fillings to start interviewing dentists about the issue on our radio show. Michael Fleming, DDS, was one of the first dentists to express concern that so-called silver fillings might be harmful to people’s health on The People’s Pharmacy (February 11, 1989).
Other dentists, especially those linked to dental schools or the American Dental Association (ADA), reassured our listeners that there was nothing to worry about. The argument seemed to be that mercury had been used in dental amalgams for decades and there was no clear evidence of harm. Basically it was a “don’t worry, be happy” kind of message.
Mercury Toxicity?
But we were worried. Mercury is nasty stuff. There was evidence years ago that if someone had silver fillings and chewed food, some mercury vapor could be inhaled into the lungs. By the way, how could anyone not chew food with mercury amalgams? When such fillings are removed, it is pretty clear that they are no longer in their original condition. The amalgams wear down and the mercury presumably ends up somewhere…most likely, in the body.
Although no one likes to state this publicly, we suspect that one reason mercury amalgam fillings remain popular with the ADA is that some dentists find them less expensive and easier to place than composite fillings. Then there is the huge unspoken concern about legal liability. Were the ADA to agree that silver fillings were unsafe, there might be a flood of lawsuits from people claiming they had been harmed by the mercury in their fillings.
The FDA’s Checkered Track Record on Amalgams
For a long time the FDA has apparently been telling the American public that there is nothing to worry about when it comes to mercury fillings. In 2009 such “dental devices” were declared safe and effective. This past winter the FDA denied petitions seeking to ban amalgams on the grounds that the mercury was harmful to the kidneys and could also cause neurological diseases.
The FDA’s position seems to have been that there was inadequate evidence demonstrating harm from mercury in amalgams. Consequently, “don’t worry, be happy.”
The Big Secret U-Turn
At the same time that the FDA was denying petitions to restrict mercury amalgam fillings, top leaders within the agency were, according to Greg Gordon, crafting a proposal that would have advised dentists to stop using mercury-containing fillings in pregnant or nursing women, young children or people with neurological diseases. Mr. Gordon reports that:
“It also urged dentists to avoid using fillings that contain mercury compounds in any patient, where possible.”
What Happened to the Secret Proposal?
Although some FDA officials were beginning to have second thoughts about the safety of mercury-containing amalgam fillings, the leaders at the Department of Health and Human Services were not on board with the reversal. Remember that the people in charge at HHS are FDA’s bosses. From what we can glean, these people decided to reject the new policy from the FDA and keep it hush-hush.
Mercury Toxicity?
How dangerous are amalgam fillings? The ADA position still seems to be that the mercury in such silver fillings stays put and is not worrisome. The counter-argument is that mercury is absorbed into the body gradually over decades and can lead to a range of harms. In particular, there is worry that mercury accumulates in kidneys and brain. Some studies suggest that excess mercury may contribute to dementia.
A recent review in the journal Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience (April 10, 2015) had this to say about mercury and Alzheimer’s disease:
“Mercury (Hg) is a heavy metal with a high potential to cause neurotoxicity. Early studies about Minamata and Iraq disasters led us to understand the neurotoxicity of this metal. It is widely accepted that Hg disrupts the brain development and produces cognitive and motor disabilities, and in adults, Hg exposure produces memory loss and cognitive alterations. An early study suggested a link between Hg exposure and AD.”
The Bottom Line
The final word is not yet in on the safety or harm of mercury-containing dental fillings. What concerns us the most, however, is that the secret FDA proposal to limit exposures to mercury was squelched by HHS. Why did that happen? Who made this decision? And where is the research to decide this debate once and for all? Without good data, we cannot make intelligent decisions about our health.
What is your experience with silver fillings? If you have any thoughts on this topic, please share them below in the comment section. We would also be grateful if you would vote on this article at the top of the page.
Safe Removal of Amalgam Fillings - IAOMT
Mercury Safe Dentists, Amalgam/Silver Filling Free Dentists ...
Scroll through the list until you find a Mercury Safe Dentist in your city, or a city close to you. Click on the dentist's name to learn more about him or her. Only dentists who are Listed on Dr. McGuire's Mercury Safe Dentist Internet Directory are listed.
10几年前牙上的银汞合金掉了，又做了个新的，从此，出现一些症状，嘴唇脱皮，用口红会更严重，无法用口红，左臂关节外侧长了块手指大的湿疹，用药就好，过一段时间又长出来，不变大，尿频。其实是身体在排毒。
后来看了些文章说银汞合金不好，但怕动牙齿对牙齿不好，一直拖。
直到偶尔看到微信上的一篇文章提到体内存在重金属会导致湿疹，才下了决心换了。
一换完，上述症状全部消失。不是所以的银汞合金都会用问题，运气不好就碰上了。
所以，如果看牙医不要用银汞合金，以前有的，找机会换了比较好。
