简体 | 繁体
loading...
海外博客
    • 首页
    • 新闻
    • 读图
    • 财经
    • 教育
    • 家居
    • 健康
    • 美食
    • 时尚
    • 旅游
    • 影视
    • 博客
    • 群吧
    • 论坛
    • 电台
  • 热点
  • 原创
  • 时政
  • 旅游
  • 美食
  • 家居
  • 健康
  • 财经
  • 教育
  • 情感
  • 星座
  • 时尚
  • 娱乐
  • 历史
  • 文化
  • 社区
  • 帮助
您的位置: 文学城 » 博客 »Value: What made America great?

Value: What made America great?

2016-04-05 09:34:53

TJKCB

TJKCB
宁静纯我心 感得事物人 写朴实清新. 闲书闲话养闲心,闲笔闲写记闲人;人生无虞懂珍惜,以沫相濡字字真。
首页 文章页 文章列表 博文目录
给我悄悄话
打印 被阅读次数

America isn't easy: Democracy comes with a price, too high now ever in history, making us wonder if it's worth. What made America great was his pioneer, cowboy spirit (freedome, liberal); however, conservative family value was its core to prosperity. When time evolves, what's the definition of that value today - it's how debate goes on. Such value is up to interpretation by different politicians while voters say theirs with their vote.

I gotta say I monitor closely what's going as I constantly listen to satellite radio shows: Rachel Maddow (MSNBC), Fox Megyn Kelly, CNN, etc. I thought Donald Trump with cowboy spirit, but little substances, no specific policy thinking, only shouting, screaming, more like a school bully. Bernie Sanders burning your blood, but lack of implementation as human nature of selfish and greedy, a driver for many. Ted Cruz, clueless about diversity of society, with bad mouth all others except himself - selfish with dark mindset - lack of kindness, graciousness. Hillary Clinton, lack of vitality and new ideas. Sad, what's our hero?

Wait, is democracy about you and me - your ideas and my ideas? Can't trust any human beings - sinners like you and me. Flaw is part of hallmark for any politicians - perfect? no way. I pray for such a powerful hero, nevertheless, for prosperity, peace and security of America, still high hope in my mind.

For those staying in America, you have any ideas why you do what you do? What's your interpretation? Some thought reading this morning's headline:

 

Bill Clinton would lose 2016 Democratic primary: Column

Gary Bauer 3:20 a.m. EDT April 5, 2016

The DNC has shifted left since the '90s, and Hillary is running against her husband's policies.

635948621401509505-bauer.JPG

Bill Clinton campaigns for his wife in Spokane, Wash., on March 21, 2016.(Photo: Tyler Tjomsland, The (Spokane, Wash.) Spokesman-Review, via AP)

13 CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 2 COMMENTEMAILMORE

It has become something of a mantra on the left that the Republican Party has moved so far to the right that even conservative icon Ronald Reagan couldn’t get nominated by today’s party. Last month, Vice President Biden asserted that the Gipper “could no more get the nomination of the Republican Party than I could get the nomination.”

It’s a cheap and self-serving claim, but it raises an interesting question: Less than 20 years since the conclusion of his presidency, could Bill Clinton receive the presidential nomination in today’s Democratic Party?

Clinton portrayed himself as a “new Democrat” — a politician who, though fairly liberal on many issues, was pragmatic enough to reach across the political aisle to get things done when necessary. Some of his primary accomplishments — welfare reform, telecommunications and financial deregulation, NAFTA, the Defense of Marriage Act and balanced budgets — were evidence that Clinton wasn’t blowing smoke when he declared that “the era of big government is over.”

He also signed a crime bill that helped lead to plummeting crime rates, instituted the military’s "don’t ask don’t tell" policy on gays and, at least rhetorically, signaled that the goal of public policy should be to make abortion not just safe and legal but also rare. Clinton even signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which most liberals deplore today and which preserved citizens’ right not to violate their deeply held beliefs.

Clinton even embraced a conservative approach on illegal immigration, signing a law that raised deportations and strengthened penalties for illegal immigrants. Little of this would be acceptable in this year's Democratic primary.

Perhaps the most telling example of how far left today's Democratic Party has moved in the past decade is the campaign of his wife. Hillary Clinton is running against her husband’s legacy almost as much as she is running against her GOP opponents.

She’s promising to raise taxes; she repudiates her husband’s tough approach to crime prevention and she is all in for gay marriage by judicial fiat.

USA TODAY

Kirsten Powers: The Republican blame game

 

And on immigration, Hillary has followed Bernie Sanders’ lead in promising not to deport anyone without a criminal record if she’s elected president. Hillary has even declined to state whether she supports her husband’s welfare reform law, which is almost universally seen as an accomplishment.

On free trade, she once supported NAFTA and other free-trade agreements. She even supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a deal between the U.S. and Asian nations, stating her support dozens of times as secretary of State. Now? She’s against it.

The Democratic front-runner is moving left not because the country has moved left (though it has on some cultural issues) but rather because her party has — dramatically so.

USA TODAY

Why a Stanford grad joined the Trump revolt: Column

 

For example, in 1992, Bill Clinton defeated several candidates who ran to his left — liberals such as Tom Harkin, Paul Tsongas and Jerry Brown. In 2016, Hillary Clinton is not only running against her husband's centrist policies, she also has an avowed socialist running to her left!

A recent American Enterprise Institute report found that while the ideological makeup of the GOP has changed some since the end of Clinton’s presidency, the profile of the Democratic Party has undergone a much bigger shift. Examining Gallup polling data, AEI researchers found that the percentage of Democrats who self-identify as liberal has soared from 29% in 2000 to 45% in 2015. Among Republicans, the percentage who identified as conservative increased only 6 percentage points over the time period, from 62% to 68%.

AEI’s Michael Barone found that while the Democratic electorate is moving lef, it is also shrinking. He found large increases in the share of liberals voting in the first three Democratic primary states compared with 2008, even as the number of Democrats voting overall decreased substantially. Hillary’s embrace of liberal policies is likely both a cause and an effect of moderate and conservative Democrats fleeing the Democratic Party.

USA TODAY

Trump's nuclear views are terrifying: Column

 

POLICING THE USA: A look at race, justice, media

Bill Clinton made headlines in recent days for taking a shot at the "awful legacy" of the Obama era.

He has a point. During Clinton's presidency, economic growth averaged roughly 3.8% per quarter in real GDP. Under President Obama, annual economic growth has averaged an anemic 1.8%.

If Hillary Clinton is promising to give us more of the same failed liberal policies of the past "awful" eight years, why would anyone vote for her?

So, could Bill Clinton get the nomination in today’s Democratic Party? Given the Democrats' lurch to the left over the past two decades, and considering Hillary Clinton’s renunciation of the more moderate and bipartisan (not to mention successful) elements of her husband’s legacy, the answer is a resounding no.

Former Republican presidential candidate Gary Bauer is president of American Values and chairman of the Campaign for Working Families. Follow @GaryLBauer.

In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes diverse opinions from outside writers, including our Board of Contributors. To read more columns like this, go to the Opinion front page.

TJKCB 发表评论于 2016-04-06 23:24:07
您的位置: 文学城 ? 论坛 ? 时事述评 ? Value: What made America great? Value: What made America great?
来源: TJKCB 于 2016-04-05 09:04:53 [档案] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读:2043 次 (24841 bytes)
TJKCB 发表评论于 2016-04-05 11:26:14
http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/currentevent/798597.html
您的位置: 文学城 ? 论坛 ? 时事述评 ? Value: What made America great?
全部论坛列表Value: What made America great? 来源: TJKCB 于 2016-04-05 09:04:53 [档案] [博客] [转至博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读:116 次 (24841 bytes)
登录后才可评论.
  • 文学城简介
  • 广告服务
  • 联系我们
  • 招聘信息
  • 注册笔名
  • 申请版主
  • 收藏文学城

WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.

Copyright ©1998-2025 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy

今日热点

  • 孝道,困在贫穷的剪刀下康赛欧
  • 我家里这一亩三分地有干不完的活儿mychina
  • 以色列——被逐出欧洲家园犹太人的无奈归宿(三)橡溪
  • 普京最大的失算就是玩弄特朗普sandstone2
  • 投资中的第22条军规:在股市高点进场?硅谷居士
  • 被男朋友抛弃了mayflower98
  • 回国印象 — 闹市里的别墅平等性
  • 我家的月子中心出了意外翩翩叶子
  • 昨天我被电话诈骗高手忽悠了5个钟头,直到今天早上还不自觉。小百脸
  • 从颜宁的暗物质谈到陈宙峰的瘙痒受体雅美之途
  • 美国发生了金融革命,美联储的天塌了2020的冬天
  • 【游记】游山玩水说旅游,旅游究竟是不是一种享受?华人lee
  • 在加拿大 我的小区我的家 (完)加拿大姥姥
  • 娃哈哈二房第三子出生年份考二时

一周热点

  • 我吃故我在:厦门vs迈阿密海鲜大PK北美_原乡人
  • 退休之后:最重要的三件事徐徐道来
  • 楼道里的默契经济学: 市井中的“道法自然”康赛欧
  • 你爱上的爱情...BeijingGirl1
  • 最不该内卷的行业旧山老松
  • 二战同盟国是正义战争么?BayFamily
  • 美国再也登不上月了!朱头山
  • 千岛群岛 -- 来自俄罗斯的邀请唐山故乡
  • 德州神秘营悲剧,应让我们明白什么老键
  • 勿忘国耻,参观第二次世界大战的终结地一游龙江(4)世界在我心中
  • 2025回国 国安法, 香港大变(图)菲儿天地
  • 世界上各种各样的手抓饭mychina
  • 我在美国看牙医戴宁生2022
  • 吴瑛教授的耶鲁毕业生女儿首次面对媒体雅美之途
Value: What made...
切换到网页版
TJKCB

TJKCB

Value: What made America great?

TJKCB (2016-04-05 09:34:53) 评论 (2)

America isn't easy: Democracy comes with a price, too high now ever in history, making us wonder if it's worth. What made America great was his pioneer, cowboy spirit (freedome, liberal); however, conservative family value was its core to prosperity. When time evolves, what's the definition of that value today - it's how debate goes on. Such value is up to interpretation by different politicians while voters say theirs with their vote.

I gotta say I monitor closely what's going as I constantly listen to satellite radio shows: Rachel Maddow (MSNBC), Fox Megyn Kelly, CNN, etc. I thought Donald Trump with cowboy spirit, but little substances, no specific policy thinking, only shouting, screaming, more like a school bully. Bernie Sanders burning your blood, but lack of implementation as human nature of selfish and greedy, a driver for many. Ted Cruz, clueless about diversity of society, with bad mouth all others except himself - selfish with dark mindset - lack of kindness, graciousness. Hillary Clinton, lack of vitality and new ideas. Sad, what's our hero?

Wait, is democracy about you and me - your ideas and my ideas? Can't trust any human beings - sinners like you and me. Flaw is part of hallmark for any politicians - perfect? no way. I pray for such a powerful hero, nevertheless, for prosperity, peace and security of America, still high hope in my mind.

For those staying in America, you have any ideas why you do what you do? What's your interpretation? Some thought reading this morning's headline:

 

Bill Clinton would lose 2016 Democratic primary: Column

Gary Bauer 3:20 a.m. EDT April 5, 2016

The DNC has shifted left since the '90s, and Hillary is running against her husband's policies.

635948621401509505-bauer.JPG

Bill Clinton campaigns for his wife in Spokane, Wash., on March 21, 2016.(Photo: Tyler Tjomsland, The (Spokane, Wash.) Spokesman-Review, via AP)

13 CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 2 COMMENTEMAILMORE

It has become something of a mantra on the left that the Republican Party has moved so far to the right that even conservative icon Ronald Reagan couldn’t get nominated by today’s party. Last month, Vice President Biden asserted that the Gipper “could no more get the nomination of the Republican Party than I could get the nomination.”

It’s a cheap and self-serving claim, but it raises an interesting question: Less than 20 years since the conclusion of his presidency, could Bill Clinton receive the presidential nomination in today’s Democratic Party?

Clinton portrayed himself as a “new Democrat” — a politician who, though fairly liberal on many issues, was pragmatic enough to reach across the political aisle to get things done when necessary. Some of his primary accomplishments — welfare reform, telecommunications and financial deregulation, NAFTA, the Defense of Marriage Act and balanced budgets — were evidence that Clinton wasn’t blowing smoke when he declared that “the era of big government is over.”

He also signed a crime bill that helped lead to plummeting crime rates, instituted the military’s "don’t ask don’t tell" policy on gays and, at least rhetorically, signaled that the goal of public policy should be to make abortion not just safe and legal but also rare. Clinton even signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which most liberals deplore today and which preserved citizens’ right not to violate their deeply held beliefs.

Clinton even embraced a conservative approach on illegal immigration, signing a law that raised deportations and strengthened penalties for illegal immigrants. Little of this would be acceptable in this year's Democratic primary.

Perhaps the most telling example of how far left today's Democratic Party has moved in the past decade is the campaign of his wife. Hillary Clinton is running against her husband’s legacy almost as much as she is running against her GOP opponents.

She’s promising to raise taxes; she repudiates her husband’s tough approach to crime prevention and she is all in for gay marriage by judicial fiat.

USA TODAY

Kirsten Powers: The Republican blame game

 

And on immigration, Hillary has followed Bernie Sanders’ lead in promising not to deport anyone without a criminal record if she’s elected president. Hillary has even declined to state whether she supports her husband’s welfare reform law, which is almost universally seen as an accomplishment.

On free trade, she once supported NAFTA and other free-trade agreements. She even supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a deal between the U.S. and Asian nations, stating her support dozens of times as secretary of State. Now? She’s against it.

The Democratic front-runner is moving left not because the country has moved left (though it has on some cultural issues) but rather because her party has — dramatically so.

USA TODAY

Why a Stanford grad joined the Trump revolt: Column

 

For example, in 1992, Bill Clinton defeated several candidates who ran to his left — liberals such as Tom Harkin, Paul Tsongas and Jerry Brown. In 2016, Hillary Clinton is not only running against her husband's centrist policies, she also has an avowed socialist running to her left!

A recent American Enterprise Institute report found that while the ideological makeup of the GOP has changed some since the end of Clinton’s presidency, the profile of the Democratic Party has undergone a much bigger shift. Examining Gallup polling data, AEI researchers found that the percentage of Democrats who self-identify as liberal has soared from 29% in 2000 to 45% in 2015. Among Republicans, the percentage who identified as conservative increased only 6 percentage points over the time period, from 62% to 68%.

AEI’s Michael Barone found that while the Democratic electorate is moving lef, it is also shrinking. He found large increases in the share of liberals voting in the first three Democratic primary states compared with 2008, even as the number of Democrats voting overall decreased substantially. Hillary’s embrace of liberal policies is likely both a cause and an effect of moderate and conservative Democrats fleeing the Democratic Party.

USA TODAY

Trump's nuclear views are terrifying: Column

 

POLICING THE USA: A look at race, justice, media

Bill Clinton made headlines in recent days for taking a shot at the "awful legacy" of the Obama era.

He has a point. During Clinton's presidency, economic growth averaged roughly 3.8% per quarter in real GDP. Under President Obama, annual economic growth has averaged an anemic 1.8%.

If Hillary Clinton is promising to give us more of the same failed liberal policies of the past "awful" eight years, why would anyone vote for her?

So, could Bill Clinton get the nomination in today’s Democratic Party? Given the Democrats' lurch to the left over the past two decades, and considering Hillary Clinton’s renunciation of the more moderate and bipartisan (not to mention successful) elements of her husband’s legacy, the answer is a resounding no.

Former Republican presidential candidate Gary Bauer is president of American Values and chairman of the Campaign for Working Families. Follow @GaryLBauer.

In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes diverse opinions from outside writers, including our Board of Contributors. To read more columns like this, go to the Opinion front page.