Never forget why I'm bloggering - just a reminder -
My note: Any writing to me, just one phrase or one line worthy of reading. I pick it up, just for myself - the title I use indicates what I treasure, not for you - don't show Unrequited love of your comment, saving for yourself. You say whatever unrelated to specifics of this post as you want, but it's mine here in my place. Screaming character assassination (not specific to issues) if you will, but in your place, not mine. Free to speak, but in your place, mind your own business.
( For some smart BS there. - I guess you won't get it if I don't tell you. "plagiarizing" means you take it without citing the source - get it? Look the format of my post! Look at my note on the top - Can you read it? Don't waste my time, next you'll be banned from my posts.
Watch out your language of accusation if you want to say any English. Do your homework, young man.
You have no clue about the word "plagiarizing" ! Retake your course ! You don't have a basics to say it. )
回复 '偶平' 的评论 : 博客就是我行我素的下笔你来你往的自由交了朋友，你就会失真。除了自我表现失真，连留言都会失真。难听的歌声你赞美，拙劣的摄影作品你夸奖，平淡的文字你说感动，不好吃的食物你说垂涎。多么虚伪多么累。I thank you for your candid comment, alerting me to read more about plagiarism. Only your specific comment helps me out in writing! Thank you again.
TJKCB 发表评论于
回复 '偶平' 的评论 :
What is Plagiarism?
Many people think of plagiarism as copying another's work or borrowing someone else's original ideas. But terms like "copying" and "borrowing" can disguise the seriousness of the offense:
According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to "plagiarize" means
?to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
?to use (another's production) without crediting the source
?to commit literary theft
?to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source
In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.
But can words and ideas really be stolen?
According to U.S. law, the answer is yes. The expression of original ideas is considered intellectual property and is protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions. Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection as long as they are recorded in some way (such as a book or a computer file).
All of the following are considered plagiarism:
?turning in someone else's work as your own
?copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
?failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
?giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
?changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
?copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)
Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source is usually enough to prevent plagiarism. See our section on citation for more information on how to cite sources properly.
What about images, videos, and music?
Using an image, video or piece of music in a work you have produced without receiving proper permission or providing appropriate citation is plagiarism. The following activities are very common in today’s society. Despite their popularity, they still count as plagiarism.
?
Copying media (especially images) from other websites to paste them into your own papers or websites.
?
Making a video using footage from others’ videos or using copyrighted music as part of the soundtrack.
?
Performing another person’s copyrighted music (i.e., playing a cover).
?
Composing a piece of music that borrows heavily from another composition.
Certainly, these media pose situations in which it can be challenging to determine whether or not the copyrights of a work are being violated. For example:
?
A photograph or scan of a copyrighted image (for example: using a photograph of a book cover to represent that book on one’s website)
?
Recording audio or video in which copyrighted music or video is playing in the background.
?
Re-creating a visual work in the same medium. (for example: shooting a photograph that uses the same composition and subject matter as someone else’s photograph)
?
Re-creating a visual work in a different medium (for example: making a painting that closely resembles another person’s photograph).
?
Re-mixing or altering copyrighted images, video or audio, even if done so in an original way.
The legality of these situations, and others, would be dependent upon the intent and context within which they are produced. The two safest approaches to take in regards to these situations is: 1) Avoid them altogether or 2) Confirm the works’ usage permissions and cite them properly.
http://www.plagiarism.org/plagiarism-101/what-is-plagiarism/
TJKCB 发表评论于
回复 '115411' 的评论 : ? 就事论事, check the definition of plagiarism!
TJKCB 发表评论于
回复 '偶平' 的评论 : Here is the rule by Wen Xue City (I've followed their rule !):
您的位置： 文学城 ? 新闻 ? 焦点新闻 ? 德普前妻爆大量家暴照片：这都是德普打的(组图)
德普前妻爆大量家暴照片：这都是德普打的(组图)
文章来源: 文学城编译 于 2016-05-27 14:48:39 - 新闻取自各大新闻媒体，新闻内容并不代表本网立场！
打印本新闻 (被阅读 37599 次)
【文学城独家编译 转载请注明出处】http://www.wenxuecity.com/news/2016/05/27/5238673.html
TJKCB 发表评论于
回复 '偶平' 的评论 : Thanks so much for keeping track - you're very kind to do all of these helping me out. My initial thought was on your accusation of " plagiarizing" - which is not defined by its definition. Sorry if I hurt your feeling, which was not my intention. I tried to help my readers to learn the truth of Western culture and its language. I gave some thought my way to doing posts, as below.
为了产生影响力，很重要的方法就是重复传递同样的信息: (excerpted from Steve Chu's commencement speech at Harvard, translated by 加州花坊 in my collection: http://blog.wenxuecity.com/myblog/57970/201605/932543.html )
Some readers asked me why I copy/paste the original posts that inspire me to write down my thought. I didn't know the answer until I read this post. Yes, I've tried to "为了产生影响力，很重要的方法就是重复传递同样的信息", not for you, but for my own study, repeats that is the only way get to my subconciousness.
回复 '偶平' 的评论 : Gotcha! See the title? 博客，自己给自己套上的枷锁 - heated debate? 自己给自己套上的枷锁 It's not worth fighting for - pseudo is pseudo - doesn't exist.
TJKCB 发表评论于
回复 '偶平' 的评论 : What's zt? What do you fight for? for pseudonym blog? It's my rule to quote the entire post (my respect to authors even to pseudonym) as I don't want to quote out of context - my place, my rule - all is my collection - don't expect anybody drops in. Sorry it disappointed you.
偶平 发表评论于
当了李鬼，还理直气壮！
偶平 发表评论于
Be calm and civil. You should add zt at your title line. Otherwise, you are trying to cheat.
偶平 发表评论于
Be calm and civil. You should add zt at your title line. Otherwise, you are trying to cheat.
TJKCB 发表评论于
回复 '偶平' 的评论 : I guess you won't get it if I don't tell you. "plagiarizing" means you take it without citing the source - get it? Look the format of my post! Look at my note on the top - Can you read it? Don't waste my time, next you'll be banned from my posts.
Watch out your language if you want to say any English. Do your homework, young man.
You have no clue about the word "plagiarizing" ! Retake your course ! You don't have a basics to say it.
TJKCB 发表评论于
回复 '115411' 的评论 : I guess you won't get it if I don't tell you. "plagiarizing" means you take it without citing the source - get it? Look the format of my post! Look at my note on the top - Can you read it? Don't waste my time, next you'll be banned from my posts.
Watch out your language if you want to say any English. Do your homework, young man.
You have no clue about the word "plagiarizing" ! Retake your course ! You don't have a basics to say it.
TJKCB 发表评论于
回复 '山里人家168' 的评论 : You have no clue about the word "plagiarizing" ! Retake your course ! You don't have a basics to say it.
TJKCB 发表评论于
回复 '115411' 的评论 : You have no clue about the word "plagiarizing" ! Retake your course !
Sing us a song tonight
We are all in the mood for melody
And you got us felling alright..
坦然对待，评而不贬，赞而不媚。
就把这当成一个成长历练的过程好了。
写得太有哲理了，偶需要好好学习啊。