So much overlapped! How can you do that on such stage? got caught red handed! (see Figure below). She diligently read from prompter! Now, they blame the speech writers - poor scapegoats. Don't you see the point?
The point is the Trumps got nothing new to offer us! If you copy DNC, why do we need you? All speech writers' thought/ideas - where is yours? Wait, Melanie Trump confessed that she wrote her own speech! below.
"blame others, Never deny any wrongdoing!" - That's Trump's playbook (read his camp's denial and accuse, below).(Note, all blue titles below with hypertext linked to the sources).
~~
Republican National Convention: Day One
Donald and Melania Trump take the stage. Photo: Joe Raedle/2016 Getty Images
There is no reason to go out of the way to be nasty about Melania Trump, an accidental political wife who surely never expected to be playing the part of the immigrant spouse, making the warm and wifely case for her husband’s cold, cruel, anti-immigrant presidential bid on the opening night of the Republican National Convention. But you don’t have to be nasty to her to point out that she was badly ill-served by her husband’s campaign apparatus tonight.
Most egregious, as first pointed out by Jarrett Hill on Twitter, is that Melania’s speech appeared to be at least partially lifted from the very successful convention speech given by Michelle Obama in 2008. A large portion of Trump’s oratory — about her parents’ lessons “that you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond and you do what you say and keep your promise, that you treat people with respect” — directly repeated Obama’s story of how she and her husband were both raised with certain values, “that you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond and you do what you say you’re going to do, that you treat people with dignity and respect.”
This is a bad — really, really bad — error. It’s the appropriation of a historic speech, made eight years ago by the first African-American First Lady of the United States, by the white woman who wants to succeed her in the White House. Who knows why it happened. Maybe, as Melania claims, she wrote the speech largely on her own; she could have used Michelle’s excellent speech as a model, hewing way too close to it. More likely is that Trump’s staff or speechwriters wrote it, used Michelle’s speech as a model and hewed way too close to it. Either way, it was political malpractice to let this woman go on national television and deliver these stolen words.
But even without the plagiarism, Melania’s speech was bad. Dressed in snowy white with poofed things at the end of her sleeves, she looked beautiful, and spoke pleasantly enough. But the words that came out of her mouth were empty, meaningless. If she had really paid attention to Michelle’s speech from 2008, what she should have taken from it was a lesson about the power of narrative specificity: Michelle told detailed, intimate stories of her life as a young person and her life as a wife and mother, details that shed light on her life, her personality, the nature of her relationship with her husband. There was the story of her father, struck in middle age with multiple sclerosis, working every morning to button his shirt and using two canes to cross the room to kiss his wife; there was the memorable scene of Barack driving Malia home from the hospital, “inching along at a snail’s pace, peering anxiously at us in the rearview mirror, feeling the whole weight of her future in his hands …”
Melania’s task should have been to humanize her cartoonish thug of a mate, whether by offering a clear picture of herself, of him, or of their family life together. But short of offering the names of her sister, the country of her birth, and her interest in “the incredible arena of fashion,” Melania provided no detail, no specificity. Instead, she delivered 20 minutes of sentences that seemed to emerge at random from a Bland Platitude Generator, a disconcertingly large percentage of which aimed to reassure an audience that her husband actually has cared about the United States prior to 2016:
“When it comes to my husband I will say that I am definitely biased and for a good reason. I have been with Donald for 18 years and have been aware of his love for this country since we first met.”
“Like me, he loves this country very much.”
“The only limit to your achievements is the strength of your dreams and your willingness to work for them.”
“My husband has been concerned about our country as long as I have known him.”
“With all of my heart, I know he will make a great and lasting difference.”
“He will never give up and most importantly he will never let you down.”
“His achievements speak for themselves.”
Trump’s “kindness is not always noted but it is there for all to see.”
“There is no room for small thinking, no room for small results; Donald gets things done.”
“My husband’s experience exemplifies growth.”
“The race will be hard fought all the way to November. There will be good times and hard times and unexpected turns.”
None of these sentences meant anything. They were words without content; clichés as empty and airy as the poofs at the end of her sleeves. Perhaps if she’d had a better speech writer, she wouldn’t have had to steal material from Michelle Obama. But she didn’t have a better speech writer, she didn’t have a better adviser, she didn’t have a better husband, and what Melania Trump is about to have is one of those hard times and unexpected turns she so confidently and blandly predicted. Sad!
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/07/manafort-hillary-is-behind-plagiarism-scandal.html
~~~
"blame others, Never deny any wrongdoing!" - That's Trump's playbook (read his camp's denial and accuse, below).(Note, all blue titles below with hypertext linked to the sources).
CLEVELAND - Donald Trump's presidential campaign came under new scrutiny Tuesday after it became apparent that part of Melania Trump's primetime address Monday night at the Republican National Convention bore conspicuous similarities to a ...
If you only read one thing: Of all the ways Republicans feared the Donald Trump convention would have hit a speed bump, a plagiarism charge against the candidate’s wife was the last thing on their minds. Sure, they expected a delegate kerfuffle over the party rules as #NeverTrump met its end, but the apparent copying of about 50 words of Michelle Obama’s 2008 convention speech in support of her husband was an unforced error that threatened to overshadow the otherwise golden moment for the Trump campaign. Conventions are multi-day infomercials scripted down to the second, offering campaigns there only opportunity at complete message control, and the sloppiness of Trump’s team points to a larger problem with the organization. While Trump initially told reporters she wrote the speech herself, the campaign backtracked swiftly to say she worked with a team of writers over the course of a month. Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort accused the press of engaging in a political witch-hunt, saying he didn’t see any plagiarism. “They’re not words that are unique words,” he told TIME.
Trump’s convention had the look and feel of a traditional political convention, but the message was more designed to tap into the conservative id than the general electorate. With a focus on illegal immigration, Benghazi and police shootings, the opening night featured conservative tropes and speakers who have made their buck on the conservative speaking circuit. To a certain extent, it’s out of necessity, as Trump is still struggling to unify the GOP.
Hillary Clinton’s explanation for why her use of a private email server was wrong. The protest scene in Cleveland. And the most political foods in America.
Here are your must-reads for now. We’ll be back with more from Cleveland this evening:
After spending more than 36 hours directly dismissing charges of plagiarism, the campaign pivoted to acknowledge that passages had been taken from Michelle Obama's 2008 speech to the Democratic National Convention, in what was framed as an innocent mistake.
What the plagiarism controversy tells us about Trump's campaign
Maeve Reston
By Maeve Reston, CNN
?Updated 11:36 AM ET, Wed July 20, 2016
?
?
?
?
?
donald trump wife melania pkg ac360_00012626.jpg
?
?02:56
Melania Trump talks about her role in Trump's campaign ?
melania trump anderson cooper sot ac_00003411.jpg
?
?01:28
Melania Trump: "I don't try to change him" ?
donald trump melania trump 2005 entire larry king live intv_00031417.jpg
?
?16:02
2005: Donald and Melania Trump as newlyweds ?
FLUSHING MEADOWS, UNITED STATES: US real estate tycoon Donald Trump, his wife Melania Knauss and their baby Barron William Trump attend the 2006 US Open men's final between Switzerrland's Roger Federer and Andy Roddick of the US at the USTA National Tennis Center in Flushing Meadows, New York, 10 September 2006. AFP PHOTO/Timothy A. CLARY (Photo credit should read TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/Getty Images)
?
?02:49
Trump's mom, wife born outside U.S. ?
melania trump anderson cooper sot ac_00003411.jpg
?
?01:49
Melania Trump: Donald Trump 'is not racist' ?
donald trump wife melania snl jnd orig pkg_00011415.jpg
?
?01:23
'Trump' in 'SNL' parody: I'm just like you, but better ?
Donald Trump and Melania Trump attend the 2015 New York Spring Spectacular at Radio City Music Hall on March 26, 2015 in New York City.
?
?02:39
Melania Trump: I'm my own person ?
donald trump melania wife campaign lemon intv_00003926.jpg
?
?00:46
Donald Trump talks about wife Melania ?
donald trump wife melania dnt todd tsr_00004312.jpg
?
?02:20
Former supermodel could be the First Lady ?
Donald Trump and Melania Trump attend the 2015 New York Spring Spectacular at Radio City Music Hall on March 26, 2015 in New York City.
?
?01:45
Who is Melania Trump? ?
Now Playing
Manafort: Media should 'move on' from Melania's speech ?
Melania Trump, wife of Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, delivers a speech on the first day of the Republican National Convention on July 18, 2016 at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. An estimated 50,000 people are expected in Cleveland, including hundreds of protesters and members of the media. The four-day Republican National Convention kicks off on July 18.
?02:18
How journalist spotted the plagiarized speech ?
rnc melania trump plagiarism paul manafort cuomo intv newday_00001720.jpg
?01:30
Manafort: Plagiarism accusations are crazy ?
?01:42
Side-by-side of Melania Trump, Michelle Obama speeches ?
Melania Trump, wife of Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, delivers a speech on the first day of the Republican National Convention on July 18, 2016 at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio.
?02:19
Melania Trump: I wrote the speech with a little help ?
?
?02:29
Melania Trump's speech bears resemblance to Obama's ?
melania trump michelle obama plagiarized manu raju sot_00003422.jpg
?
?01:53
Trump campaign comments on Melania Trump's speech ?
?
?01:47
Melania Trump: Donald has history of inclusion ?
?
?04:08
Melania Trump: Being a U.S. citizen is a privilege ?
Melania Trump
?
?02:36
A look at Melania Trump on the campaign trail ?
donald trump wife melania pkg ac360_00012626.jpg
?
?02:56
Melania Trump talks about her role in Trump's campaign ?
melania trump anderson cooper sot ac_00003411.jpg
?
?01:28
Melania Trump: "I don't try to change him" ?
donald trump melania trump 2005 entire larry king live intv_00031417.jpg
?
?16:02
2005: Donald and Melania Trump as newlyweds ?
FLUSHING MEADOWS, UNITED STATES: US real estate tycoon Donald Trump, his wife Melania Knauss and their baby Barron William Trump attend the 2006 US Open men's final between Switzerrland's Roger Federer and Andy Roddick of the US at the USTA National Tennis Center in Flushing Meadows, New York, 10 September 2006. AFP PHOTO/Timothy A. CLARY (Photo credit should read TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/Getty Images)
?
?02:49
Trump's mom, wife born outside U.S. ?
melania trump anderson cooper sot ac_00003411.jpg
?
?01:49
Melania Trump: Donald Trump 'is not racist' ?
donald trump wife melania snl jnd orig pkg_00011415.jpg
?
?01:23
'Trump' in 'SNL' parody: I'm just like you, but better ?
Donald Trump and Melania Trump attend the 2015 New York Spring Spectacular at Radio City Music Hall on March 26, 2015 in New York City.
?
?02:39
Melania Trump: I'm my own person ?
donald trump melania wife campaign lemon intv_00003926.jpg
?
?00:46
Donald Trump talks about wife Melania ?
donald trump wife melania dnt todd tsr_00004312.jpg
?
?02:20
Former supermodel could be the First Lady ?
Donald Trump and Melania Trump attend the 2015 New York Spring Spectacular at Radio City Music Hall on March 26, 2015 in New York City.
?
?01:45
Who is Melania Trump? ?
?02:20
Manafort: Media should 'move on' from Melania's speech ?
Melania Trump, wife of Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, delivers a speech on the first day of the Republican National Convention on July 18, 2016 at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. An estimated 50,000 people are expected in Cleveland, including hundreds of protesters and members of the media. The four-day Republican National Convention kicks off on July 18.
?02:18
How journalist spotted the plagiarized speech ?
rnc melania trump plagiarism paul manafort cuomo intv newday_00001720.jpg
?01:30
Manafort: Plagiarism accusations are crazy ?
?01:42
Side-by-side of Melania Trump, Michelle Obama speeches ?
Melania Trump, wife of Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, delivers a speech on the first day of the Republican National Convention on July 18, 2016 at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio.
?02:19
Melania Trump: I wrote the speech with a little help ?
?
?02:29
Melania Trump's speech bears resemblance to Obama's ?
melania trump michelle obama plagiarized manu raju sot_00003422.jpg
?
?01:53
Trump campaign comments on Melania Trump's speech ?
?
?01:47
Melania Trump: Donald has history of inclusion ?
?
?04:08
Melania Trump: Being a U.S. citizen is a privilege ?
Melania Trump
?
?02:36
A look at Melania Trump on the campaign trail ?
.
?
?
Story highlights
Plagiarism controversy is yet another unsettling episode for the Trump campaign
No immediate sign of a campaign shakeup
Cleveland (CNN) — Donald Trump claimed the Republican nomination Tuesday after flattening the establishment with his unorthodox campaign -- but his convention is also exposing the downside of his freewheeling approach.
The Trump campaign descended into a familiar messiness after Melania Trump delivered a convention speech Monday echoing lines from Michelle Obama's 2008 convention address.
On the tumultuous day that followed, Donald Trump was furious. Melania Trump was humiliated. And the campaign, which had appeared to be on the path to becoming a more organized, disciplined operation, was back on its heels, dealing with swirling accusations and internal finger-pointing that yielded no real answers about what happened.
No one to be fired after Melania Trump speech plagiarism
There was no immediate sign of a campaign shakeup Wednesday and it remains unclear whether the incident will have a lasting effect.
Trump's campaign chairman Paul Manafort continued to refuse to acknowledge Wednesday morning that parts of Melania Trump's convention speech were lifted lines, saying the controversy is "not meaningful at all."
"The speech was very effective and communicated those feelings," Manafort told CNN's Chris Cuomo on "New Day." "The controversy you're talking about is not meaningful at all. She's not a candidate for office. She was expressing her personal feelings about her country and her husband and why he's best for the United States."
It is yet another unsettling episode for the Trump campaign at a time when many top donors are closely watching Trump and his operation to determine whether it is worth their investment this fall.
Side-by-side of Melania Trump, Michelle Obama speeches
?
?
Side-by-side of Melania Trump, Michelle Obama speeches
Watch this video
Related Video: Side-by-side of Melania Trump, Michelle Obama speeches 01:42
Melania Trump's convention speech was billed as one of the highlights of this week, one that could help humanize him and appeal to female voters concerned about his temperament. In the moment, it seemed like an elegant triumph for the Republican nominee, who proudly escorted his wife off stage after a kiss. But soon side-by-side comparisons of Melania Trump's remarks and Michelle Obama's 2008 speech were playing non-stop on the networks.
The trouble seemed to subside for the time being Tuesday when Trump won the roll call vote that officially made him the Republican nominee and a series of speakers -- most notably New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie -- forcefully argued against Hillary Clinton's candidacy.
It is clear that Trump's children, who are new to politics, are a driving force guiding their father, but sometimes appear out of their depth when it comes to the necessary infrastructure of a general election campaign — particularly when the candidate has insisted that it stay lean and mean.
Donald Trump claims GOP mantle
Manafort's team has brought depth and experience to the team — and he pulled off an impressive feat last week by squelching a rebellion in the rules committee with a team of 100 lawyers. They have also worked effectively to sway Republican delegates who had once been hesitant to support Trump.
Skeletal communications staff
But the campaign's skeletal communications staff is still struggling to drive a daily message or even control the candidate's insatiable appetite for media attention. Trump, for example, inexplicably called in to give an interview with Fox Monday night -- missing a poignant speech by two survivors of the Benghazi attack.
On Tuesday, Trump aides and allies were at a loss to explain who wrote Melania's speech and how the plagiarism had occurred. The campaign's spokesman produced an incoherent statement at nearly 2 a.m. Tuesday that referred to "Melania's team of writers" without identifying any of them. That directly conflicted with Melania Trump's comment earlier to Matt Lauer on "Today" that she wrote her speech with "as little help as possible."
CNN Politics app
When Manafort appeared on CNN Tuesday morning, he called the accusation of plagiarism "just really absurd." He insisted Melania had used "common words" and not "cribbed" from Michelle Obama's speech. Around the same time, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus told reporters at a Bloomberg Politics breakfast he'd "probably" fire whoever was responsible for the plagiarized quotes.
In the next dramatic twist, Trump's recently fired campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said Manafort, his former rival on the Trump campaign, should take responsibility for the controversy, noting that Manafort was brought on to have oversight of every aspect of the convention.
Bob Dole reflects on Trump
"The buck stops at the top," Lewandowski, a CNN contributor, said.
"I think it's shameful that Melania Trump, who is such a great person, who represents her husband and would represent this country amazingly as first lady, is under this controversy because the staff didn't do her well," Lewandowski said.
Of Manafort, he said, "Whoever signed off, with the final sign off, and allowed this to go forward, should be held accountable," he said. "I think if it was Paul Manafort, he'd do the right thing and resign."
?
Manafort: Media should 'move on' from Melania's speech
?
?
Manafort: Media should 'move on' from Melania's speech
Watch this video
Related Video: Manafort: Media should 'move on' from Melania's speech 02:20
The Trump campaign then said no one would be fired or disciplined over the incident.
Multiple sources with knowledge of the speech writing process within the campaign said Trump's son-in-law and trusted confidante, Jared Kushner, got the ball rolling in June when he enlisted two pre-eminent speechwriters, Matthew Scully, a speechwriter for George W. Bush, and his partner John McConnell, to draft Melania's speech.
Melania Trump's unexpected moment
They delivered a prospective speech to the campaign that incorporated humor, some light teasing of the real estate magnate and a focus on her upbringing in Slovenia and efforts to become an American citizen, according to several sources who read the original draft.
The draft was well received by the Trump campaign mid-June. But somewhat mysteriously, Scully and McConnell were not consulted again.
The speech Melania Trump delivered on Monday night was an entirely different speech than what they had drafted, with the exception of a half-dozen lines. The controversial lines echoing Michelle Obama's speech were not in Scully and McConnell's original draft.
No clarity about who was responsible
Trump advisers said Tuesday that Melania had been guided by a number of different people throughout the process, but offered no clarity about who was responsible for the paragraph and phrases in question.
Donald Trump Jr. defended both Melania and Manafort during an interview with CBS This Morning Co-host Norah O'Donnell -- batting away Lewandowski's comments.
"There's a reason Paul is in the position that he is today and Corey is not, and it is not because Paul is amateur hour," Donald Trump Jr. said. "I think it is nonsense. I heard that other people ask 'Oh, is the family on the outs with Paul?' Total nonsense."
Related Video: Lewandowski: Staffer behind speech should resign 01:21
Perhaps because of the possible backlash effect of speaking negatively about a Republican candidate's wife who has been reluctant to seek the spotlight, Democrats largely avoided commenting on the controversy on Tuesday.
While the Trump campaign released talking points on how to respond, most surrogates did not appear to take the campaign's lead.
Perhaps the most unusual response on the controversy came from former 2016 candidate Ben Carson, when he was asked about the plagiarism charge after addressing the Florida delegation breakfast.
Nightcap: The latest news and political buzz from CNN Politics | Sign up
"I think what we should be thinking about is if Melania's speech is similar to Michelle Obama's speech, that should make us all very happy because we should be saying whether we're Democrats or Republicans, we share the same values," Carson said. "That's what we should be talking about. Not trying to make it controversy."
CNN's Ashley Killough and Eugene Scott contributed to this story
Melania Trump’s speech at the GOP convention in Cleveland is drawing comparisons to Michelle Obama’s speech at the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver. Here’s a side-by-side look at both. (Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)
It’s not clear whether there will be any long-term political fallout from Melania Trump’s speech Monday night, in which she introduced herself to the nation with passages that closely mirrored a speech Michelle Obama first delivered eight years ago.
But high school teachers and college professors say it is almost certain that if Melania Trump were a student turning in a paper — rather than a prospective First Lady giving a convention speech — the consequences would be serious, ranging from an F on the assignment to expulsion from school.
Josh Davis, who teaches high school English and journalism in Beachwood, Ohio, said Trump’s speech is a classic example of the kind of plagiarism he sees among high school students.
Local Headlines newsletter
Daily headlines about the Washington region.
Sign up
“Sure, some words were changed, but the shell is the same,” Davis said. “It’s a pretty clear example of what I might see, where a student took another kid’s paper and changed half a dozen words and said ‘Oh, I paraphrased it, so it’s mine.’ And I say, ‘No, you plagiarized it.'”
Davis said a student who borrowed as much language as Trump would likely get a zero on the assignment — along with a lesson on why plagiarism is wrong. Sometimes, he said, such borrowing is a sign of a student who is struggling.
[Melania Trump’s speech appears to have cribbed from Michelle Obama’s in 2008]
“Frequently, students that resort to that — not to excuse it — but frequently, in high school, it’s issues with ability,” he said. “Students who are in over their head are more likely to resort to something like that.”
Davis plans to vote for Hillary Clinton. But he said plagiarism is not a problem confined to the GOP, citing accusations of plagiarism that helped derail the 1988 presidential campaign of now-Vice President Joe Biden. “Even though I’m a Democrat, I haven’t had much respect for him because of that.”
Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort has denied that Melania Trump’s speech included any plagiarism.
“There’s no cribbing of Michelle Obama’s speech. These were common words and values that she cares about, her family, things like that,” Manafort said on CNN’s “New Day” Tuesday morning. “She was speaking in front of 35 million people last night, she knew that, to think that she would be cribbing Michelle Obama’s words is crazy.”
[Scrutiny of Melania Trump’s speech follows plagiarism allegations]
But a specialist in ethics at Dartmouth College said Trump’s speech struck her as a clear-cut case of plagiarism.
If a college student had turned in a paper with the same amount of verbal overlap that Melania Trump’s speech contained, “that student would have been brought up on plagiarism charges, no doubt,” said Aine Donovan, director of the Ethics Institute at Dartmouth.
Donovan said the sanctions students would face for such an offense vary from school to school. “They would be at minimum chastised, at worst separated from the college or the university,” she said.
Colleges sometimes make distinctions in judging plagiarism, finding certain cases to be slight verbal overlaps and others total cut-and-paste jobs.
“This would definitely be at minimum a yellow flag,” Donovan said of Trump’s speech, but she noted that college students are held to a different standard than politicians. “We’re trying to train students in principles of integrity and academic honesty.”
Donovan said she has taught at colleges with strong honor codes, including Dartmouth and the U.S. Naval Academy. “So many undergrads don’t understand the concept of honor. We take it very seriously,” she said. “Somebody could say, ‘Who cares about words? Who cares about plagiarism?’ Well, there’s a slippery slope involved.”
Perhaps no one is more familiar with that slippery slope than Jayson Blair, who was seen as a rising star in journalism before he resigned from the New York Times in 2003, admitting at the time to plagiarizing and fabricating facts and scenes in dozens of his articles, including in coverage of the Washington-area sniper case. The Times called Blair’s misdeeds “journalistic fraud” that tarnished the newspaper’s reputation.
Blair said he now speaks often to high school and college students about the lasting impact that his decision to plagiarize has had on his personal life and professional career.
“When you commit plagiarism on a national stage it really has the opportunity to significantly set back your life and your career,” Blair said. Copying someone else’s language makes it appear that “you’re willing to take from others without giving credit. It makes you seem as if you don’t have original ideas,” Blair said.
Several years ago, Blair said, a college journalism professor called him for advice about a student who had shown great promise but who was caught plagiarizing. Blair said that he spoke to the student and talked with him about the consequences of copying others’ work.
“My consequence was very public, and I’ve had the opportunity to rebuild, but I can never go into the profession I love the most,” Blair said. “I’m banned and barred for life from that field.”
Blair said that, in the end, the professor opted to fail the student rather than force his expulsion. Blair has since kept tabs on the student, and with Blair’s help, the student apparently learned his lesson: He still works in journalism today, Blair said.
TJKCB 发表评论于
Jim Morrison
6:17 PM PDT [Edited]
Why wasn't Martin Luther King's Doctorate rightfully revoked when scholars later discovered and declared that he plagiarized his dissertation thesis while at Boston University? That sure didn't demonstrate very good content of character.
LikeReplyShare
Brad Plows
6:08 PM PDT
Obama did the same thing in 2008. As well as joe Biden.
LikeReplyShare
Stayin'Alive
5:28 PM PDT
Certainly it wasn't Melania Trump who plagiarized Michelle Obama, just as certainly as the responsibility lies with the Joseph Goebbels-like Paul Manatort. He is either directly responsible, or more likely is simply the poor (and bullying) campaign manger he appears to be.
One thing is certain: the phrase "your word is your bond" has its roots directly in African-American history. Since I rather doubt the south of Slovenia gave rise to such a phrase, then unless Melanie shares that culture with Michelle Obama, or is a student of the history and culture of Blacks in America, her words were absolutely plagiarized... something we already know.
LikeReplyShare
Landy00
5:12 PM PDT
Find this hard to believe. Most high school grads have trouble reading, spelling and writing. It is already been proven that college kids buy their papers online and cheating is at an all time high.
LikeReplyShare
Daniel Leonard
4:45 PM PDT
It is nice to see that the teachers are out in force to grade Ms Trump's speech. Too bad the same teachers never speak out regarding the deplorable grammar employed by journalists on a daily basis. Beginning a sentence with a conjunction (such as,"But he said plagiarism...", from the foregoing article) and the continual use of "different than" in writing everywhere one turns. One phrase (mis)used constantly by people who SHOULD know better is the reference to "healthy" foods. This, of course, indicates that the food in question is suffering from no illness. The question of whether or not that food is healthful is left unanswered. If only the teachers themselves had the ability to properly use our language correctly, they probably would have long ago began grading the press - and the grades would be abysmally low.
LikeReplyShare
Chris Henne
4:27 PM PDT
Teachers are morons... 1 she didnt write it she just delivered it... 2 you let far worse get through in your classrooms.
LikeReplyShare
2 ·
Bern Grosse
3:30 PM PDT
Apparently none of you have ever read Michele Obama's Master's Thesis. If you are interested in an adventure in imbecility and hideous underachievement read it. As the late Christopher Hitchens said, " It was written in a language he had never seen before." Sheer illiteracy and ignorance on putrid display. Your writers need to take some remedial courses in journalistic honesty.
LikeReplyShare
1 ·
Mfuta
3:29 PM PDT
What do you expect from a college drop out?
LikeReplyShare
Chris Henne
4:34 PM PDT
except.... she didnt write it, she just delivered it
LikeReply
Stayin'Alive
5:32 PM PDT
"except.... she didnt write it, she just delivered it"
Even worse! If she doesn't know what she's saying or where it came from, she's as vacuous as she appears to be, and would only make a good First Fashion Model.
Like
Mary Stein
3:14 PM PDT
How many times have our parents and grand=parents said those same words to us as children? The words, nor the phraseology is not new nor do they belong solely to Michelle Obama. Those words belong to every parent and grand -parent who wanted nothing more than to raise good, decent, law abiding children and secure a more peaceful future for all of us.
LikeReplyShare
4 ·
cris12356
3:41 PM PDT
That doesn't matter, if she wants to be our First Lady, shouldn't she have put in just a little effort and not stolen a speech?
LikeReply
1 ·
Barry Davis
4:07 PM PDT
While I don't condone delivering a "stolen" speech, when it becomes the duty of the First Lady to create domestic and foreign policy, and to deliver important speeches to cabinet meetings, to Congress, and not just for the press, then I will agree.
Like
1 ·
Eric Kilian
5:43 PM PDT
Apparently you don't understand how plagiarism works, Mary. Those weren't just similar ideas. Those were strings of words combined in the exact same order. That doesn't happen by chance. Whoever "wrote" that speech copied part of it directly from Mrs. Obama's 2008 speech.
And if you want to secure a "more peaceful future", I've no idea why you'd defend the Trumps. Donald literally said we should kill innocent family members of terrorists. Real "peaceful".
LikeReply
conare
2:58 PM PDT
Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort has denied that Melania Trump’s speech included any plagiarism.
“There’s no cribbing of Michelle Obama’s speech. These were common words and values that she cares about, her family, things like that,”
how to lose all credibility in two sentences flat ^^^^^
LikeReplyShare
1 ·
RFinley
2:34 PM PDT
Poor Melania! I find her engaging, classy and intelligent. But there is no hiding this inexcusable snafu..Due diligence fail at its worst! Hearing the Trump Camp excuse it away is like finding your spouse in bed with your best friend and saying "Honey its not what you think"!!
If I were Melania, it would be a left hook to her speech writer and a swift kick in the balls for her husband!
LikeReplyShare
3 ·
cris12356
3:43 PM PDT
She said and I quote "I wrote it with a LITTLE help",when Matt Lauer interviewed her. Intelligent? She speaks broken English and dropped out of college.
LikeReply
Chris Henne
4:30 PM PDT
Speaking English i s not a sign or absence of intelligence, nor is completing or dropping out of college. Do you speak Swahili? No? Then you must be an imbecile! Her English is broken because she is a foreigner, NOT bc she is not intelligent. Im not saying she is intelligent, Im just saying youre a moron for that argument.
Like
dbothroydearthlinknet
2:33 PM PDT
I think the F would go to the writers of this for petty cattyness
LikeReplyShare
1 ·
washingtonpostid4comment
2:40 PM PDT
If this is what they have to focus on, you know they don't have much else.....
LikeReply
washingtonpostid4comment
2:09 PM PDT
"It’s not clear whether there will be any long-term political fallout from Melania Trump’s speech Monday night...." but we are trying our best to make that happen! We are taking a very unimportant issue and trying to make it huge and ongoing.
LikeReplyShare
1 ·
Eyerty
2:19 PM PDT
Benghazi! (always wanted to say that, ha ha)
LikeReply
2 ·
Garrett Jackson
1:04 PM PDT
This entire episode will be forgiven by half our nation and criticized by the other half. We no longer argue ideas but rather takes sides blindly behind our party, the left versus the right and just as sad those who follow blindly their church. I'm disappointed in our country and what it has become. I certainly won't waste my time voting or praying for its healing. I no longer have faith in either.
LikeReplyShare
2 ·
BillFrancis - Summerfield Florida
1:01 PM PDT
some Trump speech writers are now fired, as they should be.
TJKCB 发表评论于
"Trump's campaign denied accusations that a portion of Melania Trump's first night speech was plagiarized, she used "common words." Others affiliated with the campaign seemed to concede there were some similarities. " What example do you set for students in school?
TJKCB 发表评论于
? Trump's campaign denied accusations that a portion of Melania Trump's first night speech was plagiarized, she used "common words." Others affiliated with the campaign seemed to concede there were some similarities.
TJKCB 发表评论于
NYMag.com
Daily Intelligencer
Vulture
The Cut
Science of Us
Select All
Grub Street
Bedford & Bowery
FOLLOW:
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
LOG IN|
REGISTER
New York magazine intel
Subscribe ?
Give a Gift ?
Digital Edition ?
Home
News & Politics
Daily Intelligencer
Jonathan Chait
Marin Cogan
Ed Kilgore
Annie Lowrey
Frank Rich
Chris Smith
Rebecca Traister
Entertainment
Vulture
Art
Books
Classical & Dance
Movies
Music
Theater
TV
Agenda: To Do This Week
Fashion
The Cut
Beauty
Fashion News & Trends
Fashion Shows
Street Style
Celebrity Style
Designers
Models
Goods & Product Picks
Love & War
Restaurants
Restaurants Search & Menus
Grub Street
Best of NY Food
Cheap Eats
Where to Eat 2016
Recipes
Bars
Bar Search
Best of NY Nightlife
Stores
Store Search
Best of NY Shopping
Home Design
Goods & Product Picks
The Magazine
Subscribe Now
Give Gift Subscription
Download the App
Buy Back Issues
View Current Issue
Online Issue Archive
Customer Service
Media Kit
Travel Design Weddings Real Estate Doctors NYC Tourist Guide Best of New York Issue Deals
Daily Intelligencer
/early and often
July 19, 2016
1:56 a.m.
The Trump Campaign Failed Melania — and Not Just Because of the Plagiarism
By Rebecca Traister
5k
Shares
Share
5k
Tweet
0
Share
18
Share
6
Email
154
Print
Republican National Convention: Day One
Donald and Melania Trump take the stage. Photo: Joe Raedle/2016 Getty Images
There is no reason to go out of the way to be nasty about Melania Trump, an accidental political wife who surely never expected to be playing the part of the immigrant spouse, making the warm and wifely case for her husband’s cold, cruel, anti-immigrant presidential bid on the opening night of the Republican National Convention. But you don’t have to be nasty to her to point out that she was badly ill-served by her husband’s campaign apparatus tonight.
Most egregious, as first pointed out by Jarrett Hill on Twitter, is that Melania’s speech appeared to be at least partially lifted from the very successful convention speech given by Michelle Obama in 2008. A large portion of Trump’s oratory — about her parents’ lessons “that you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond and you do what you say and keep your promise, that you treat people with respect” — directly repeated Obama’s story of how she and her husband were both raised with certain values, “that you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond and you do what you say you’re going to do, that you treat people with dignity and respect.”
This is a bad — really, really bad — error. It’s the appropriation of a historic speech, made eight years ago by the first African-American First Lady of the United States, by the white woman who wants to succeed her in the White House. Who knows why it happened. Maybe, as Melania claims, she wrote the speech largely on her own; she could have used Michelle’s excellent speech as a model, hewing way too close to it. More likely is that Trump’s staff or speechwriters wrote it, used Michelle’s speech as a model and hewed way too close to it. Either way, it was political malpractice to let this woman go on national television and deliver these stolen words.
But even without the plagiarism, Melania’s speech was bad. Dressed in snowy white with poofed things at the end of her sleeves, she looked beautiful, and spoke pleasantly enough. But the words that came out of her mouth were empty, meaningless. If she had really paid attention to Michelle’s speech from 2008, what she should have taken from it was a lesson about the power of narrative specificity: Michelle told detailed, intimate stories of her life as a young person and her life as a wife and mother, details that shed light on her life, her personality, the nature of her relationship with her husband. There was the story of her father, struck in middle age with multiple sclerosis, working every morning to button his shirt and using two canes to cross the room to kiss his wife; there was the memorable scene of Barack driving Malia home from the hospital, “inching along at a snail’s pace, peering anxiously at us in the rearview mirror, feeling the whole weight of her future in his hands …”
Melania’s task should have been to humanize her cartoonish thug of a mate, whether by offering a clear picture of herself, of him, or of their family life together. But short of offering the names of her sister, the country of her birth, and her interest in “the incredible arena of fashion,” Melania provided no detail, no specificity. Instead, she delivered 20 minutes of sentences that seemed to emerge at random from a Bland Platitude Generator, a disconcertingly large percentage of which aimed to reassure an audience that her husband actually has cared about the United States prior to 2016:
“When it comes to my husband I will say that I am definitely biased and for a good reason. I have been with Donald for 18 years and have been aware of his love for this country since we first met.”
“Like me, he loves this country very much.”
“The only limit to your achievements is the strength of your dreams and your willingness to work for them.”
“My husband has been concerned about our country as long as I have known him.”
“With all of my heart, I know he will make a great and lasting difference.”
“He will never give up and most importantly he will never let you down.”
“His achievements speak for themselves.”
Trump’s “kindness is not always noted but it is there for all to see.”
“There is no room for small thinking, no room for small results; Donald gets things done.”
“My husband’s experience exemplifies growth.”
“The race will be hard fought all the way to November. There will be good times and hard times and unexpected turns.”
None of these sentences meant anything. They were words without content; clichés as empty and airy as the poofs at the end of her sleeves. Perhaps if she’d had a better speech writer, she wouldn’t have had to steal material from Michelle Obama. But she didn’t have a better speech writer, she didn’t have a better adviser, she didn’t have a better husband, and what Melania Trump is about to have is one of those hard times and unexpected turns she so confidently and blandly predicted. Sad!
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/07/manafort-hillary-is-behind-plagiarism-scandal.html
That is the most damaging part. She did not have the kind of DEGREE she claimed to have. And she did not write the kind of speech she claimed to have written.
Ms. Trump should not have pretended she were as intelligent as the current first lady. Ms. Obama does have a real Harvard degree to back up her claims. Ms. Trump has nothing in the category.
Therefore, Ms. Trump is a Pretender, not a contender! It proves once again that it is not what it SOUNDS like to win people's trust. It is your TRUE words that win people over!
? Not fair to compare her to Mrs. Obama on public speach skills. --worldance-- ♀ 给 -worldance- 发送悄悄话 -worldance- 的个人群组 (258 bytes) (23 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 10:38:57
? You miss the point. Honesty is the issue here. -Derrick_Liu- ♂ 给 Derrick_Liu 发送悄悄话 Derrick_Liu 的个人群组 (236 bytes) (20 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 10:39:44
? well, i was responding to OP, this wasn't the issue --worldance-- ♀ 给 -worldance- 发送悄悄话 -worldance- 的个人群组 (129 bytes) (11 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 10:46:24
Melania Trump -- July, 2016: "We need to pass those lessons on to the many generations to follow," she said. "Because we want our children in this nation to know that the only limit to your achievements is the strength of your dreams and your willingness to work for them."
Michelle Obama -- August, 2008: "Barack and I set out to build lives guided by these values and to pass them onto the next generation, because we want our children — and all children in this nation — to know that the only limit to the height of your achievements is the reach of your dreams and your willingness to work hard for them."
但是只要多做一下research,还有不少人比黑女人更早说过类似的话比如:
Will Steger's 1989 book, Crossing Antarctica:
"As I learned anew in crossing Antarctica, the only limit to achievement is the limit you place on your own dreams."
还有 Michelle中使用Working hard, treating people with dignity and respect, and keeping your promises -- or knowing that "your word is your bond" 的段子:
Michelle Obama -- August, 2008: "And Barack and I were raised with so many of the same values: like, you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond, that you do what you say you're going to do, that you treat people with dignity and respect, even if you don't know them and even if you don't agree with them."
类似的例子:
The values of honesty, hard work, and treating others as you'd like to be treated ring a lot more like the age-old "Golden Rule" combined with a little bit of the "Cowboy Code of Ethics" -- 早于2008;
2001 obituary 出版的书中:
"He [my father] taught me .... how to work hard, how to be respectful of others, how to play a guitar, how your word is your bond..."