Some people may believe that the "seven-words-in-a-row" criterion we use is too strict. Others may think it is too lenient (e.g., more than 3 words in a row from the source is word-for-word plagiarism).
How to Recognize Plagiarism
Criteria Used for Indiana University Plagiarism Tests
Decision rules and test hints are provided below. These are the criteria which you should apply when taking the Indiana University Plagiarism test. These will help you to decide if a student version is word-for-word plagiarism, paraphrasing plagiarism, or not plagiarism.
The criteria listed below are not the only valid criteria for classifying plagiarism in every context. However, applying the criteria listed below should help you to be successful in the context of Indiana University Plagiarism Tests.
Decision Rules
|
Does the student version take ideas from the original source material? |
||||
|
Yes |
No |
|||
|
Is at least one idea taken from the original source material a direct word-for-word quote of seven or more words in the student version? |
||||
|
Yes |
No |
|||
|
Is the direct word-for-word quote missing either quotation marks, or missing the full in-text citation that includes a specific locator, or missing the reference in the student version? |
Is the paraphrased idea missing the in-text citation or missing the reference in the student version? |
|||
|
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
|
The student version is: |
The student version is: |
The student version is: |
The student version is: |
The student version is: |
For another way of viewing this, see Hints.
Plagiarism Test Notes
- Some examples will include both word-for-word plagiarism and paraphrasing plagiarism. If both kinds of plagiarism are present, you must choose word-for-word for a correct answer.
- Sneaky plagiarism is the hardest kind to detect. See examples of such patterns.
We have seen students do this in their writing. In some places, they will paraphrase correctly, quote correctly, and cite correctly, but in other places they also include a string of 7 or more words in sequence taken from the source, or paraphrase without citation. This is still word-for-word plagiarism, if quotation marks are missing or the full in-text citation is missing which must include a specific locator (e.g., page number); or it is paraphrasing plagiarism if ideas in the source are used without clear attribution by proper citation.
Some test takers might claim that these are "trick questions." Nonetheless, plagiarism is still plagiarism, even if disguised this way.
- Some people may believe that the "seven-words-in-a-row" criterion we use is too strict. Others may think it is too lenient (e.g., more than 3 words in a row from the source is word-for-word plagiarism).
- There should be no question whose right answer depends on determining if the idea taken from the original source material qualifies as "common knowledge".
School of Education
201 North Rose Ave.
Bloomington, IN 47405-1006
Comments or questions? E-mail us.
This file was last updated on August 19, 2013 by T. Frick
Copyright 2006, Trustees of Indiana University
Copyright Complaints
What English sentences contain repeated, consecutive words? - Quora
java - Finding repeated words on a string and counting the repetitions ...
regex - Regular Expression For Consecutive Duplicate Words - Stack ...
python - How to find the count of a word in a string? - Stack Overflow
What exactly is the "five (consecutive) word" plagiarism rule? - Writers ...
Apr 2, 2013 - You can't rationally define plagiarism simply in terms of the number of words that are the same. Many short strings of words like those above ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
您的位置： 文学城 » 论坛 » 时事述评 » 谈抄袭是左棍自己把脸凑上来给人打---就用左棍的标准看看Michelle Obama有没有这两段话的版权
谈抄袭是左棍自己把脸凑上来给人打---就用左棍的标准看看Michelle Obama有没有这两段话的版权
这是左棍们认为抄袭黑女人的一句话：
Melania Trump -- July, 2016: "We need to pass those lessons on to the many generations to follow," she said. "Because we want our children in this nation to know that the only limit to your achievements is the strength of your dreams and your willingness to work for them."
Michelle Obama -- August, 2008: "Barack and I set out to build lives guided by these values and to pass them onto the next generation, because we want our children — and all children in this nation — to know that the only limit to the height of your achievements is the reach of your dreams and your willingness to work hard for them."
但是只要多做一下research，还有不少人比黑女人更早说过类似的话比如：
Will Steger's 1989 book, Crossing Antarctica：
"As I learned anew in crossing Antarctica, the only limit to achievement is the limit you place on your own dreams."
还有 Michelle中使用Working hard, treating people with dignity and respect, and keeping your promises -- or knowing that "your word is your bond" 的段子：
Michelle Obama -- August, 2008: "And Barack and I were raised with so many of the same values: like, you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond, that you do what you say you're going to do, that you treat people with dignity and respect, even if you don't know them and even if you don't agree with them."
类似的例子：
The values of honesty, hard work, and treating others as you'd like to be treated ring a lot more like the age-old "Golden Rule" combined with a little bit of the "Cowboy Code of Ethics" -- 早于2008；
"He [my father] taught me .... how to work hard, how to be respectful of others, how to play a guitar, how your word is your bond..."
所以左棍先别提侵权，先看看你家黑女人有版权吗？
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Making the first lady great again!
所有跟帖：
• It should be:make all OB's sons great again!! Including son like -FastTurtle- ♂ 
(247 bytes) (39 reads) 07/18/2016 postreply 22:43:29
• A son like sweet boy Michael brown. -FastTurtle- ♂ (0 bytes) (6 reads) 07/18/2016 postreply 22:44:20
• 是啊，都吵翻天了。会前她还和记者说是她自己写的，写好后让别人看看。唉，这么大的事，众目睽睽之下怎么能如此 -笑薇.- ♀ (88 bytes) (104 reads) 07/18/2016 postreply 23:07:01
• 她的讲话很长，就有两段＂好好学习天天向上＂的段子几乎每个政客都要讲的玩意，算了吧 -FastTurtle- ♂ (0 bytes) (10 reads) 07/18/2016 postreply 23:12:09
• 嗯，没在美国上过学。不知道抄袭和剽窃的厉害。要是现在，就被开除了。 -笑薇.- ♀ (0 bytes) (1 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:27:03
• 你先证明黑婆娘的版权。关于在哪儿上学什么的诚心的话这事完了我们可以挂钱打赌让看我是哪里毕业的。 -smalleagle- ♂ (0 bytes) (1 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 08:16:55
• 上过就该知道抄袭剽窃的严重性。可是您不知道啊。 -笑薇.- ♀ (0 bytes) (0 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 09:21:58
• 省省吧，类似的生活经历因为你们民主党说了其他人再也不能说？你敢用这标准衡量老妖婆吗我不信她的生活经历就没人说过类似的。 -smalleagle- ♂ (170 bytes) (30 reads) 07/18/2016 postreply 23:41:07
• 这和民主党有何关系？再说，也不是。问，会用标点符号吗？那东西没版权。而写者必需用。 -笑薇.- ♀ (0 bytes) (5 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:28:52
• cnn电视上的记者和嘉宾认为这个应该是专职撰稿人的作品，尽管她说是自己写的。 -区分大小写已经存在- ♂ (96 bytes) (30 reads) 07/18/2016 postreply 23:46:53
• 反正不要脸了所以连证据都没有就一口咬定了----楼主这次实在没法给你5毛，给你1毛5吧 -smalleagle- ♂ (0 bytes) (3 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:00:06
• trump：“i love the poorly educated.” you just proved it again. -区分大小写已经存在- ♂ (96 bytes) (11 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:07:52
• 还有比楼主悲催的吗？本来是民主党洗脑的结果洗的自己都信了。来吧比比学历用事实看看那边的支持者学历低吧？ -smalleagle- ♂ (0 bytes) (3 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:12:58
• trump：“i love the poorly educated.” you just proved it again -区分大小写已经存在- ♂ (4872 bytes) (12 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:17:20
• 幽默不说，还使用准确。 -笑薇.- ♀ (0 bytes) (4 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:31:10
• 楼主多大年纪了没看过几届演讲吧有一点相似的内容就大惊小怪---就这见识也只能和不爱上学的黑天使一起当左棍了。 -smalleagle- ♂ (143 bytes) (25 reads) 07/18/2016 postreply 23:31:53
• 没错，这世界就没有抄袭这个字，至少你不认识。 -区分大小写已经存在- ♂ (0 bytes) (3 reads) 07/18/2016 postreply 23:47:57
• 类似的生活经历只因为民主党说过了以后其他人再也不能说了---你抄袭这个词是从黑天使学的吧？ -smalleagle- ♂ (0 bytes) (5 reads) 07/18/2016 postreply 23:53:45
• trump：“i love th poorly educated.” -区分大小写已经存在- ♂ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 07/18/2016 postreply 23:56:13
• 民调-低收入者（0-5万）66%支持希拉里 -smalleagle- ♂ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:00:51
• trump：“i love the poorly educated.” you just proved it. -区分大小写已经存在- ♂ (3009 bytes) (15 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:03:54
• 呵呵，这还真不怕你，来呀和爷比比学历和paper？看看希拉里和trump的支持者谁学历低？ -smalleagle- ♂ (59 bytes) (14 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:05:31
• trump：“i love the poorly educated.” you just proved it again and -区分大小写已经存在- ♂ (80 bytes) (4 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:09:42
• 还有比楼主悲催的吗为民主党洗脑的结果洗的自己都信了，来吧比比学历用事实说那边的支持者学历低吧？ -smalleagle- ♂ (0 bytes) (5 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:11:06
• trump：“i love the poorly educated.” you just proved it again -区分大小写已经存在- ♂ (4872 bytes) (1 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:16:03
• 还有比楼主悲催的吗本来是民主党洗脑的结果洗的自己都信了---来吧比比学历用事实看看那边的支持者学历低吧？ -smalleagle- ♂ (0 bytes) (5 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:10:12
• trump：“i love the poorly educated.” you just proved it again -区分大小写已经存在- ♂ (4872 bytes) (3 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:16:08
• 知道只是版权一说吗？要是刚从中国来，又没在美国读过书，完全理解，不过，马上改，别给自己找麻烦。 -笑薇.- ♀ (0 bytes) (1 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:37:11
• 行啊，先证明黑婆娘有版权----如果就是生活经历的话我比她早多少年就写过无数好好学习天天向上的故事了 -smalleagle- ♂ (0 bytes) (0 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 08:14:16
• 没在美国上过学，要是赶上今天上学，一定要被学校开除了。这简直是小学生都懂的，用citation 和 reference. -笑薇.- ♀ (0 bytes) (3 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 00:35:22
• 不知道谁没在这里上过学，citation这词你也敢说？ -smalleagle- ♂ (41 bytes) (6 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 08:18:48
• 能否不要咽着藏着？啥意思？麻烦科普一下？ -happycow222- ♂ (0 bytes) (4 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 02:37:48
• 幽默不说，还使用准确。 - 笑薇. -区分大小写已经存在- ♂ (342 bytes) (9 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 08:32:09
• Poor libs 哈哈！ -ThisMyWords- ♂ (0 bytes) (0 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 07:12:58
• 哈哈哈 good one：”Making the first lady great again!“ -tomcat801- ♂ (0 bytes) (0 reads) 07/19/2016 postreply 07:33:16
• Holly cow! dialogues made me laugh so loudly that other asked me -TJKCB- ♀ (0 bytes) (0 reads) 07/23/2016 postreply 23:48:24
