"In 2004 and 2008, IBD/TIPP had the smallest deviation from the certified results, and across the last three presidential races, IBD/TIPP had the lowest average divergence.
In the 2012 race, polling analyst Nate Silver, then of the New York Times' blog FiveThirtyEight.com, ranked 23 presidential polling organizations using his own methodology and called IBD/TIPP "the most accurate" tracking poll for the year."
Investor's business daily: Trump leads by 1.3% (before and after the 3rd debate)
It’s too early to measure the impact of last night’s final presidential debate, but Republican Donald Trump now has a three-point lead nationally on Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinto”
左中右三方调研结果的相同之处,在于老川的支持率都在上升。大家可以大致判断,事实上老川正在迎头赶上,选情胶着,这也是民主党内部实际上很恐慌的原因。最终鹿死谁手还不好说。不过如林肯名言所述:“You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannnot fool all the people all the time.”
iced91030 2016-10-20 14:13:49
you are referring Rasmussen! You are kidding me.
Take a look at 2008 and 2012 result, Rasmussen numbers were way off, too bias to republican. they are the same as Pharos Research, only Pharos Research is bias to democrat.
it is OK to support Donald, no shame on that, but leave science out of it.
阿留 发表评论于
回复 'jiewang' 的评论 :
多谢垂赏点评。林肯这句话,堪称至理名言。
jiewang 发表评论于
"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannnot fool all the people all the time.“