I suggest you write an op-ed or a letter in the same spirit and in English to the New York Times, or other newspapers or online publications so that your opinion reaches more people beyond the Chinese community. I understand why Michael uses that kind of tone of sadness and conciliatory. He is trying to appeal to the empathy of the wide American society and not appear confrontational like an angry young man. There is a place for this kind of strategy. The example of Gandhi and Nelson Mandela come to mind. The kind of discrimination and oppression they and their fellow countrymen and races have experience are far greater and more dire than what the Chinese community has. Your letter on the other hand would be much needed a head on frontal attack to put those ugly attitudes in their right place.
There is one point of yours I do not agree with though. "种族歧视言论...甚至应该受到法律惩处" All speeches and expressions should be protected by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America with no exception. Otherwise, how would one define one speech that should be prosecuted and another not, by whose standard? Any such rules will not even pass the test of logic (in the mathematical not rhetorical sense). It will only result in arbitrary rules instituted by whomever is the throne of power. It is a slippery slope leading to sure disaster. Think of any socialist and fascist societies, culminating in catastrophes like Cultural Revolution. How do we counter so called "hate speeches"? By righteous ones just like yours! Simple as that.
