回复 '农家苦' 的评论 :
By "写实" I suppose you mean adhering to logic, and by "写意" throwing logic away. You mean you are taking the latter approach. Surely in the island civilization which respects individual freedom it is fully in your right to put down any random delusion and hallucination or epiphany, as you would most likely term it, engendered from your drug session. It does not have to make any logical sense. I am sorry I thought otherwise.
We are talking about rights though. Don't you think it is ironic and contradictory that you cherish your rights so dearly, and obviously you are enjoying all the rights of individuality and independence that are integral part of and the signature of what you call island civilization, distinct from what you call the continental civilization. And yet you wish the continental civilization to destroy the island one, together with the right you are brandishing about as if it is your last straw. What contradiction!
Of course, it is alright. I should not forget you are the master of 写意. Why should mere logic be any obstacle? Damn the logic, full speed ahead!
回复 '农家苦' 的评论 :
It is shocking how confused you are with logic. In your example, you are describing the present state of Yang. People pretty much know what a beautiful woman looks like. Your blog essentially predicts the future state of Yang, whether she will be in ten years serving the Tang emperor or fucked by the rebels. You picked one future state without giving any argument as to how you arrive there. If this is not a giant leap of logic, what is? If this is so obvious to everyone, why are you then wasting time writing the obvious?
"这个逻辑不是很清晰吗?" Really? You do not realize the giant leap of logic of yours I was referring to. "... 继续做海岛国家,它就会与海岛一起沉没。" That is predicated on the conclusion I mentioned in my last comment "the continental civilization will be the superior one in the future" or in your words "未来岛文明和大陆文明要翻转". This was the giant leap in logic that you provided no support for whatsoever in your blog.
You are trying to say the continental civilization and island civilization prosper alternately. But how do you arrive at the conclusion "美国 ... 否则,它有可能自行解体,或是被德法孤立,中俄打垮。"? Putting aside issues like whether capitalism is intrinsically island civilization, how do you draw the conclusion the continental civilization will be the superior one in the future and the US should choose to be on that side? That is one giant leap of logic in your article that has no support whatsoever.