I am not asserting compressed sensing is a great discovery or advancement in science or mathematics. I am merely asking you to, if not prove, at least explicate in detail, your assertion. What has prohibited you from doing the minimum to at least support your own allegation?
And what does Terry being a Chinese have anything to do with what contribution he has made to mathematics and how big? Why are you so defensive about his ethnicity? Is your valuation going to be different had he been, say a Caucasian? What is your rationale?
nightrider 发表评论于
@诚信:
Nobody asks you to reveal your personal and professional information. What does your political stance have anything to do with this topic, at all? What does your alleged personal friendship with Terry Tao have anything to do with the topic, at all? For all we care, you could be the neighbor of his babysitter's brother in law. What you have said is wholly irrelevant to the discussion.
1) I pointed out that your assertion that this article says nothing about Terry Tao's contribution to mathematics is false.
2) I am asking you to point out where the two papers go wrong or how it is not relevant to practice. If you are not capable of stating the technical points yourself, perhaps you can provide a link to a review paper that allege the same as you do regarding compressed sensing.
You said "在本文里, 却丝毫没有只字提及他对数学的贡献, 只是反复强调他在数学学习中的傲人成绩。" Did you actually read the article? The article writes
"杰出的数学家一般分为两类,一类是对数学各个分支的发展有整体的把握,具有全局观;另一类是在自身的研究领域有很深的造诣。这两类数学家发展到一定程度都可以称为大师。而陶哲轩是少有的既能把握数学学科的全局,又能在各个分支进行深入研究,取得领先成果的人。以他自己的话说,他赖以生存的本事是在把在一个领域中挖掘出来的宝藏转移到另一个领域中。
Moreover, in 2006 Terence Tao received the Fields Medal "for his contributions to partial differential equations, combinatorics, harmonic analysis and additive number theory".
This is not not good enough for a mathematician or is it not good enough for you?
I know you reject the theory of compressed sensing. I have on several occasions asked you for concrete rationale. You have never responded. Here I ask again. What is your objection to the theory of compressed sensing. More specifically which part is wrong with Terence Tao's two foundational papers on compressed sensing the links of which I post here? Could you please explicate in details? I am dying to know.
https://statweb.stanford.edu/~candes/publications/downloads/StableRecovery.pdf
https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0409186.pdf
kebob 发表评论于
高斯什么时候成犹太人了?典型的高地德国人姓氏。
老朽 发表评论于
敬仰!原来是有学问的专业人士,不光是吃喝玩乐坐邮轮。
chufang 发表评论于
回复 '诚信' 的评论 :那他以什么得菲尔茨奖呢?
若敏 发表评论于
回复 '诚信' 的评论 :
感谢您的评论!
若敏 发表评论于
回复 '土豆-禾苗' 的评论 :
谢谢您的评论!
诚信 发表评论于
读完后感慨万千, 忍不住打几个字。 很感慨人类社会的荒诞。 不仅这位“明捷”作者, 很多教材的作者也都将 Terry 与数学奠基大师们排列一起, 真是让人感慨。