Javad Fardaei
2 hrs ago
Dear Dai
I am sure, you know, there is different between Sunlight and Laser beam light.
The property of sunlight is from high frequencies to low frequencies, and from short wavelength to high wavelength, that each ray has its own speed, but laser beam has just one frequency and wavelength.
Sunlight has visible to invisible character...
Unfortunately science mislead itself for century by saying "speed of light" is constant which it is not.
sadly, our icons did not detect this simple phenomenon, either. What I am saying is right and it conform by science as well. Science is wrong on light and sunlight speed
https://www.academia.edu/70960207/Science_is_wrong_on_Light_and_Photon
regards & thank you.
Like
Rongqing Dai
9 mins ago
well, for the sake of the paradox that I am presenting here, what kind of light is not important.....in the container, the reason I am using laser is to create a sense of concentrated beam over a300000km length....just for psychological reason.....it does not really matter.....even if it is just a single photon, the paradox still holds since it is in vacuum without any medium.......as for beam A and beam B, the type of light is even less important.....they are just used as position markers.....if you can imagine well, then you might just assume there are two virtual empty pillars....I use beams of light for, again, making it easy for people to imagine.....
The real deal here is that no one (not even Einstein) has ever tried to put two relatively moving frames of reference connected as the targets of the SAME photon (or beam) to examine the logic behind the constancy of the speed of light.....Although there have been many critics of the constancy of the speed of light like yourself, I would say that this essay is the first one that provides a realistic paradox that no one can deny!
As for you, a critics of the constancy of the speed of light, it might or might not be a paradox depending on how you differ from the constancy of the speed of light.....if your difference is only in whether sunlight and other lights are the same, then it would still be a paradox.....if you don't agree with that the speed of light in vacuum is independent of the selection of frame of reference, then it is no longer a paradox for you....
This paradox holds only to the mainstream physicists who believe that the speed of light in vacuum is constant to all frames of reference......
慕容青草 发表评论于
下面是我在本文的英文版贴出的地方加的提示，同样适用于这里：
A courtesy reminder
I have been often surprised by how poorly professionals read very short essays....so as a courtesy reminder for anyone who would come to comment: Please answer the question whether the laser beam would hit the hole and the beam A or B at the same time as a proof that you do have the ability to understand this short essay.....
慕容青草 发表评论于
居然没有一个人能读懂这个悖论？人类文明衰败如此？？？下面是我在一个专业讨论论坛上的留言：
It seems that academic physicists are collectively so intellectually crippled simply because they are so weak in philosophical thinking.....
A typical symptom is that when given a writing they would start a big talk and draw conclusions without even comprehending the content....Recently I am presenting a paradox challenging the constancy of the speed of light and I have posted it in multiple places in the internet, but NOT a single PROFESSIONAL PHYSICIST seems to be intellectually capable enough even to read and grasp the content of that very short essay....the only thing they could do is to come and make IRRELEVANT comments------this is so typical with nowadays disabled professional community of physicists, they are just intellectually SO WEAK.
It makes me feel so bad every time when I need to teach them how to read and think and comment maturely like teaching little kids!!! How corrupted is nowadays community of professional physicists???
Here is another chance for those intellectually weak physicists: ARE you even able to read this short essay correctly:
