来源: dhyang_wxc 于 2023-11-02 07:58:01
是思维的问题。没有那个思维，巧妇难为无米炊——
热气哄哄，红火熊熊，它没米在里面，说什么好？
张祥龙说的就是，整个思维被蔡阉割了。只有极少数人能自己偶然、碰巧、
奋力逃脱——然后被围剿。
子曰，不可使知之。
巧妇难为无米, but she can think of wheat flour, meat (chicken, ducks, goose, cattles,
porks, lamp,), seafood, and fruits. Why stick with rice? She didn't think about her
purpose to feed the hunger.
Purpose-driven life: Honor God and help people (HGHP). What is the endpoint
measurement?
That notion got me the below:
Stanford $5 thinking box:
The professor assigned $5 to each student to invest within 2 hours. The winner will be
the one with the highest return. Guess how the winner was doing?
The winner:
only one student threw $5 (refused to think from the $5 angle); she thought outside
the $5 box and went out saying to talk with companies - she would serve as a consultant and signed contracts with a few companies. She secured consulting contracts with down payments. This student's approach
demonstrates resourcefulness and an ability to think creatively.
The losers:
All the other students put $5 framework to rentals, to clean places, free service,...
conventional methods like renting and cleaning might have generated some income
within the given time frame, but their returns might have been relatively modest.
***
Notes:
a basic understanding of the situation presented: In the Stanford $5 thinking box
scenario, the professor assigned $5 to each student to invest within a limited time
frame of 2 hours. The goal was to generate the highest return on the initial investment.
In this specific case, one student approached the task in an unconventional manner
by using the $5 to network and secure consulting contracts with companies.
This student's approach was different from the others who opted for more traditional
methods such as using the $5 for renting or cleaning services.
The term "rudimentary understanding" typically refers to a basic or elementary level
of knowledge or comprehension of a subject. In this context, it appears that the
student's innovative and unconventional approach enabled them to achieve a higher
return compared to their peers who employed more conventional methods within the
given constraints. This highlights the importance of creative thinking and the potential
for significant outcomes even with limited resources.
** **
Credits dued to The sources of my inspiration for the post above, are as follows.
所有跟帖：
• 子曰，不可使知之。君臣父子，各歸其位，不可妄思！ -TJKCB- ♀ 
(0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 postreply 09:48:59
• 巧妇=米, why only rice? -TJKCB- ♀ (448 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 postreply 09:57:01
• 旧思维，新文化 - stonebench - ♂ (2191 bytes) (6504 reads) 11/01/2023 12:15:24 
(5)
• 还是要思考这个大一统思维是否窒息民主和科学。 - Dayoufan - ♂ (177 bytes) (11 reads) 11/01/2023 13:04:27
• 这个俺同意一半。新文化运动时确实需要考虑保留传统会不会影响变革的速度。 - stonebench - ♂ (125 bytes) (1 reads) 11/01/2023 20:18:38
• 在政治上，如果没有向外获利空间，开拓意识就必然内转～～：
西方现有制度的成功很大程度是大航海以来以极低成本占有了大量资源 - 方外居士 - ♂ (0 bytes) (4 reads) 11/01/2023 14:24:06
• 这使得外向开拓获利而不是内卷成为可能。现在的西方仍然在收获这个红利，
只是方式变了。 - 方外居士 - ♂ (0 bytes) (3 reads) 11/01/2023 14:27:46
• 今后这个制度能否继续下去极大地取决于能否继续获得新的低成本资源。
比如技术的进步让以前的废物变成宝贝。 - 方外居士 - ♂ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/01/2023 15:11:19
• 完全同意。事实上西方崛起就是源于大航海后，发现并占领了殖民地。 - 为人父 - ♂ (51 bytes) (3 reads) 11/01/2023 19:18:29
• 二元对立的思维=(赛先生开拓创收+ 德先生妥协机制后台分利) - TJKCB - ♀ (846 bytes) (25 reads) 11/01/2023 15:05:05
• 有象斯有对，对必反其为，有反斯有仇，仇必和而解 - TJKCB - ♀ (16333 bytes) (20 reads) 11/01/2023 15:23:04 (2)
• we must expand 德先生妥协机制后台分利Two wheels move along - TJKCB - ♀ (432 bytes) (11 reads) 11/01/2023 15:25:13
• 中文很棒～～ - 盈盈一笑间 - ♀ (0 bytes) (1 reads) 11/01/2023 17:49:26
• 莫非中文不是母语才特别赞中文棒？ - 方外居士 - ♂ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/01/2023 18:57:52
• 好像是英文比中文好。 - 盈盈一笑间 - ♀ (0 bytes) (1 reads) 11/01/2023 19:31:21
• 也有同感 - 方外居士 - ♂ (0 bytes) (0 reads) 11/01/2023 20:16:16
• The clash betw/ individualism (West) and collectivism (East) - TJKCB - ♀ (1848 bytes) (18 reads) 11/01/2023 15:37:59 (1)
• 此贴请转美坛，展开讨论。：） - 盈盈一笑间 - ♀ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/01/2023 17:50:08
• 对德先生赛先生的新理解 - 盈盈一笑间 - ♀ (0 bytes) (3 reads) 11/01/2023 17:49:03 (1)
那麽關鍵問題是為什麽這部分人最终在中国勝出，而成為書寫歷史者。 - 中间小谢 - ♂ (354 bytes) (23 reads) 11/01/2023 19:52:48 (1)
• 我相信是因為中國當時恰處於衰微之時，故我下面說的"分流"之中，
小智短見成了主流。如果同样的歷史際遇出现在唐宋， - 中间小谢 - ♂ (131 bytes) (11 reads) 11/01/2023 20:30:00 (1)
• “人才由于学术”。传统学术能容许民国这些人的出现，这些人回过身，弄它个断根，
再无人才。。。。这是百年史。 - dhyang_wxc - ♂ (0 bytes) (1 reads) 11/02/2023 08:04:46 (1)
• 楊振寧 梁漱溟 against 民主絕對主義/尺有所短，寸有所長/survival is measured - TJKCB - ♀ (104 bytes) (1 reads) 11/02/2023 09:36:40
• 赞！紧扣内核，简明意赅。也赞同前面石教授客观宽容地看待新文化运动之于
中国社会大背景。-：） - 有言 - ♂ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/01/2023 21:57:13 (1)
• 是思维的问题。没有那个思维，巧妇难为无米炊——热气哄哄，红火熊熊，
它没米在里面，说什么好？ - dhyang_wxc - ♂ (179 bytes) (7 reads) 11/02/2023 07:58:01 (1)
• 子曰，不可使知之。君臣父子，各歸其位，不可妄思！ - TJKCB - ♀ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 09:48:59
• 巧妇=米, why only rice? - TJKCB - ♀ (448 bytes) (3 reads) 11/02/2023 09:57:01
• 巧妇为米是思维的问题没有那个思维巧妇难为无米炊Stanford $5 thinking box: - TJKCB - ♀ (54491 bytes) (28 reads) 11/02/2023 10:22:32 (1)
• 这世界真是处处有墙，很多人没意识到而已。越是自负的人越是在墙里打转。：） - 为人父 - ♂ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 10:37:19 (1)
• Humans are measured by 处处有墙. Why not? - TJKCB - ♀ (156 bytes) (0 reads) 11/02/2023 11:43:23
• ok，再贴一遍这个跟贴； - dhyang_wxc - ♂ (874 bytes) (11 reads) 11/02/2023 10:48:05 (1)
• doordash=大da师sh[it]=comprador=Con artists - TJKCB - ♀ (0 bytes) (0 reads) 11/02/2023 11:28:36
• It will be an issue If everybody thinks in a creative way. - 方外居士 - ♂ (0 bytes) (5 reads) 11/02/2023 10:53:10 (1)
• Only a small portion of individuals can be creative - 方外居士 - ♂ (0 bytes) (1 reads) 11/02/2023 10:54:10
• being creative is to figure out - stonebench - ♂ (256 bytes) (5 reads) 11/02/2023 10:56:10 (1)
• True, still in the box. Like stock, most people lose creativ - 方外居士 - ♂ (0 bytes) (1 reads) 11/02/2023 11:19:54
• "the unfigured, still in the box" who made the box? - TJKCB - ♀ (1334 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 11:25:17
• Good point - 方外居士 - ♂ (0 bytes) (1 reads) 11/02/2023 11:34:45 (1)
• Modern society lost in aristocracy failure of leading mass - TJKCB - ♀ (5214 bytes) (4 reads) 11/02/2023 11:34:01
• 英国不曾中断的贵族传统和文化现在仍然影响着现代社会 - 方外居士 - ♂ (0 bytes) (1 reads) 11/02/2023 11:37:43
• Neither Prince Charles nor his son Harry; both got lost - TJKCB - ♀ (0 bytes) (0 reads) 11/02/2023 11:38:59
• I don't get the story. - 中间小谢 - ♂ (226 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 11:38:46 (1)
• Selling the Stanford brand! Look at up the case - TJKCB - ♀ (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 11:40:26
• superstitious to addict to Stanford consultants, selling - TJKCB - ♀ (252 bytes) (0 reads) 11/02/2023 11:46:10
