中国新经济计划 不救楼市 加大投资制造业

中国新经济计划:加大对制造业投资,无意出手救楼市

KEITH BRADSHER  2023年11月7日
 
中国潍坊的一个农产品批发市场。中国经济学家表示,经济正面临着毛泽东时代以来最严峻的考验。
中国潍坊的一个农产品批发市场。中国经济学家表示,经济正面临着毛泽东时代以来最严峻的考验。 GILLES SABRIÉ FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
面临为疲弱的经济复苏提供支持的压力,中国的政治领导人正在缓慢地将经济引至新的方向。由于经济增长不能再靠房地产地方债推动,官员们正在加大对制造业的投资,并增加了中央政府的借贷。
上周公布的数据显示,国有银行已开始持续减少为房地产行业提供的贷款,这是自2005年中国开始有可比记录以来的首次。大量资金已流向了制造商,尤其是电动汽车和半导体等快速增长行业。
这种做法是存在风险的。中国的工厂长期存在着供过于求的问题,其数量远远超过满足国内市场的需求。加大对制造业的重视可能会导致出口的增多,而这有可能引起其贸易伙伴的不满。中国为制造业提供更多的贷款,对西方国家来说也是一种挑战,后者也正在通过立法,鼓励加大对本国某些相同行业的投资,比如拜登政府通过的《通胀削减法案》。
向制造业贷款的转变凸显出中国政府无意救助国内负债累累的房地产市场。约占国民经济四分之一的建筑和住房行业目前正在受到房价、房屋销售以及投资急剧下降的影响。
中国增加对其他行业的投资可能会在未来几个月刺激更多的经济增长,从而部分抵消房地产行业的麻烦。但用更多的中央政府债务来取代地方债对化解债务积累给经济增长带来的长期拖累没有多少帮助。
“我认为债务对短期发展不是问题,但我们需要关注中长期发展,”渣打银行中国首席经济学家丁爽最近在广州举行的中国经济学家和金融专家的论坛上说。“恰当地说,房地产行业还没有触底。”
潍坊的一个废弃的建筑工地。中国决策者们已限制了向房地产业的贷款,而且不愿意为拯救楼市改变政策。
潍坊的一个废弃的建筑工地。中国决策者们已限制了向房地产业的贷款,而且不愿意为拯救楼市改变政策。 GILLES SABRIÉ FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
中国房地产业危机的根源在于借债驱动了40年的投机行为,它将房价推高到与租金或家庭收入不成比例的程度。中国的政策制定者们已在几年前开始限制向房地产业贷款,引发了该行业最近的衰退,但政策制定者现在不愿意通过再次大规模发放住房贷款来拯救房地产业。
中国政府曾以为,国家领导人取消了最严格的“新冠清零”措施后,中国经济会在2023年出现反弹,去年的经济因为严格的“清零”措施而遭到摧毁。但经济活动在年初爆发后,在春季和夏季增长缓慢,脆弱性依然存在:制造业活动在今年8月和9月有所增长后,上个月再次出现下降。
在中国最高领导人习近平上周主持召开的一个会议上,党政官员们闭门讨论了金融政策。据会后发布的官方纪要,会议要求将更多的财政资源引导到先进制造业上去,并为地方政府提供帮助。
在房地产市场陷入困境的同时,工厂建设却在政府支持的投资推动下紧锣密鼓地进行着。
中国已经建成的太阳能组件厂足以满足全世界的需求。它建成的汽车制造厂足以生产所有在中国、欧洲和美国销售的汽车。到2024年底,中国将在短短五年时间里建成的石化厂将与欧洲、日本和韩国目前运营的数量相当。
经济学家们在中国智库国际金融论坛最近在广州举行的会上承认,中国目前面临的挑战相当严重,上次遇到这种挑战是在毛泽东1976年去世后的那几年。但他们预测,对新的制造技术的大笔投资将带来回报。
潍坊的一个太阳能和风电发电场。中国已有的太阳能组件厂足以满足全世界的需求。
潍坊的一个太阳能和风电发电场。中国已有的太阳能组件厂足以满足全世界的需求。 GILLES SABRIÉ FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
“我们今天的困难与1978年的差不多,所以现在的问题是,什么是创新驱动增长的未来?”张燕生说,他曾在中央政府的经济规划部门任高级官员,现在就职于中国国际经济交流中心。
新加坡国立大学东亚研究所所长郝福满(Bert Hofman)在广州的会上表示,中国的银行系统把贷款从房地产业转向制造业的做法始于几年前。
在新冠疫情前,中国的银行系统每年向房地产行业增加相当于7000多亿美元的贷款。在截至今年9月的12个月里,房地产业的未偿贷款总额略有下降。银行减少了对开发商的贷款,而家庭还清了老房贷,同时新房贷的数量减少了。
相比之下,银行提供给工业企业的净贷款已从2019年前九 个月的折合630亿美元,飙升至今年前九个月的6800亿美元。 增加的贷款部分用于发展半导体行业,让中国有可能摆脱对进口的依赖,从而绕过美国的出口管制,其他部分则用于电动汽车制造和造船等行业。
许多经济学家担心,向制造业投入更多的资金可能解决不了更广泛的经济问题。房地产行业仍在衰退,靠增加对汽车制造等行业的投资来抵消规模巨大的房地产行业的麻烦并不容易,汽车制造业对经济产出的贡献只有6%到7%。
中国苏州的一家生产重型机械的工厂。2023年前九个月工业企业得到的净贷款几乎是四年前的11倍。
中国苏州的一家生产重型机械的工厂。2023年前九个月工业企业得到的净贷款几乎是四年前的11倍。 CHINATOPIX, VIA ASSOCIATED PRESS
大举投资建厂可能会激怒其他国家:新工厂生产的产品大部分可能用于出口,因为许多中国家庭已削减了支出。
但美国和欧盟已越来越不愿意接受更多的对华贸易逆差。 欧盟已对中国电动汽车行业使用政府补贴的情况展开调查,在欧盟和中国之间产生了新的贸易分歧。
意识到这些风险,中国正在发展中国家寻求市场。这些国家虽然也有规模庞大的制造业,但设备比较陈旧,这为中国更新、更高效的工厂出口产品提供了机会。许多发展中国家正在艰难地与中国重新谈判它们欠下中国的基础设施项目巨额债务,这让它们在提高对中国商品关税上处于不利地位。
中国的工厂几十年来一直在全球获得越来越多优势。据联合国工业发展组织的数据,中国在全球制造业中的份额自2000年以来已增长了近五倍,达到31%。美国占的份额已下降到16%,除中国外的发展中国家的份额则一直保持在19%。
当然,中国的做法中也有不变的东西,那就是依靠借贷来推动增长。
多年来,官员们曾多次试图戒掉靠债务增长经济的习惯。时任副总理的刘鹤曾在2018年的一次讲话中承诺,三年内控制债务规模。
潍坊农产品批发市场内。
潍坊农产品批发市场内。 GILLES SABRIÉ FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
但自2020年以来,地方政府的债务反而激增,去年已达到相当于近8万亿美元的水平,地方政府下属表外融资机构也积累了数万亿美元的债务。中国的总体债务不断膨胀,相对于中国的经济产出,债务已经达到了比美国和许多其他发达国家高许多的水平。
北京大学国家发展研究院院长姚洋今年9月表示,控制债务的努力并未取得成功。
“尤其是在2014-2018年,本应是化债窗口期,债务却迅猛增长,且在2020年之后情况变得更严峻,”他在一次讲话中说。“由此可见,过去采取的化债手段没有起到应有的作用,反而有些适得其反。”
 

Siyi Zhao对本文有研究贡献。

Keith Bradsher是《纽约时报》北京分社社长,此前曾任上海分社社长、香港分社社长、底特律分社社长,以及华盛顿记者。他在新冠疫情期间常驻中国进行报道。 点击查看更多关于他的信息。

翻译:纽约时报中文网

More Semiconductors, Less Housing: China's New Economic Plan

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/06/business/china-economy-property-crisis.html

Policymakers, wary of inciting reckless borrowing in real estate, are instead investing heavily in factories and trying to help indebted local governments.

Three workers load blue boxes onto the rear of a red truck, seen through a warehouse’s doors.

A wholesale produce market in Weifang, China. The country’s economists say the economy is facing its toughest test since the Mao era.Credit...Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times

China's political leaders, under pressure to support the country’s fragile recovery, are slowly steering the economy on a new course. No longer able to rely on real estate and local debt to drive growth, they are instead investing more heavily in manufacturing and increasing borrowing by the central government.

For the first time since 2005, when comparable record keeping in China began, banks controlled by the state have started a sustained reduction in real estate lending, data released last week showed. Enormous sums are instead being channeled to manufacturers, particularly in fast-growing industries like electric cars and semiconductors.

There are risks to the approach. China has a chronic oversupply of factories, well more than it needs for its domestic market. A greater emphasis on manufacturing will probably lead to more exports, an increase that could antagonize China’s trading partners. China’s extra lending also poses a challenge for the West, which is trying to foster extra investment in some of the same industries through legislation like the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act.

The shift to manufacturing loans underlines Beijing’s reluctance to bail out China’s debt-burdened property market. Construction and housing account for about a quarter of the economy and are now suffering from steep declines in prices, sales and investment.

 

China’s investment push might stir more growth in the coming months, partly offsetting troubles in the housing sector. But more central government borrowing, as a replacement for local borrowing, will do little to defuse the long-term drag on growth caused by accumulating debt.

“I don’t think there is a problem for short-term development, but we have to be concerned about medium and long-term development,” Ding Shuang, the chief economist for China at Standard Chartered, said at a recent forum of Chinese economists and finance experts in Guangzhou. “It’s fair to say real estate is not at a floor.”

 
Image
 

The concrete frames of several unfinished towers stand apart from one another on a scrubby lot.

An abandoned construction site in Weifang. After reining in lending for housing, Chinese policymakers are reluctant to change course and rescue the building industry.Credit...Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times
 
 

The concrete frames of several unfinished towers stand apart from one another on a scrubby lot.

China’s housing crisis has its roots in four decades of debt-fueled speculation that drove prices to levels far above what could normally be justified by rents or household incomes. China’s policymakers triggered the sector’s recent decline by starting to rein in lending several years ago, and now are reluctant to rescue the sector by kicking off another binge of housing loans.

The government believed that China’s economy would snap back in 2023 after the country’s leaders lifted most “zero Covid” restrictions that quashed the economy last year. But after an initial burst of activity, growth lagged in the spring and summer. Vulnerabilities remain: Manufacturing activity stumbled again last month, after showing growth in August and September.

 

Last week, at a conference presided over by Xi Jinping, China’s top leader, Communist Party and government officials met in private to discuss finance policy. According to an official statement afterward, the conference ordered that more financial resources be channeled to advanced manufacturing industries, as well as assistance to local governments.

While the housing market struggles, factory construction fueled by government-backed financing is in high gear.

 

China has already built enough solar panel factories to supply the entire world’s needs. It has built enough auto factories to make every car sold in China, Europe and the United States. And by the end of 2024, China will have built in just five years as many petrochemical factories as all of those now running in Europe plus Japan and South Korea.

Economists at the recent gathering in Guangzhou, held by the International Finance Forum, a Chinese think tank, acknowledged that the country faced challenges not encountered since the years immediately after Mao’s death in 1976. But they predicted that big investments in new manufacturing technologies would pay off.

 
Image
 

Rows of solar panels stretch to the horizon. In the distance, wind turbines.

A solar and wind farm in Weifang. China already has enough solar panel factories to meet the entire world’s needs.Credit...Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times
 
 

Rows of solar panels stretch to the horizon. In the distance, wind turbines.

“Today we have comparable difficulties as 1978, so the question now is what will be the future of innovation-driven growth?” said Zhang Yansheng, a former senior official in the central government’s economic planning agency who is now at the China Center for International Economic Exchanges.

 

The China banking system’s switch from real estate loans to manufacturing started several years ago, Bert Hofman, the director of the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore, said at the Guangzhou event.

Before the pandemic, China’s banks were increasing their lending to real estate by more than $700 billion a year. In the 12 months through September, the total loans outstanding to real estate fell slightly. Banks lent less to developers, and households paid off old mortgages while taking out fewer new ones.

By comparison, net lending to industrial companies skyrocketed from $63 billion in the first nine months of 2019 to $680 billion in the first nine months of this year. That money has gone partly toward building a semiconductor industry that may allow China to wean itself from imports and bypass American export controls, as well as toward categories like electric car manufacturing and shipbuilding.

Many economists have expressed concern that throwing more money at manufacturing might not fix the broader economy. The real estate sector is still decaying and is so large that offsetting its troubles with growth in industries like car manufacturing, which is 6 to 7 percent of economic output, won’t be easy.

 
 
Image
 

Machinery and workers in blue uniforms and yellow hard hards inside a factory.

A factory producing heavy machinery in Suzhou, China. Net lending to industrial companies in the first nine months of 2023 was nearly 11 times the amount four years earlier. Credit...ChinaTopix, via Associated Press
 
 

Machinery and workers in blue uniforms and yellow hard hards inside a factory.

The factory construction splurge threatens to antagonize other countries: Much of the additional output is likely to be exported because many Chinese households have curtailed spending.

But the United States and the European Union have become less willing to accept further increases in their trade deficits with China. The European Union is already investigating the use of government subsidies by China’s electric vehicle industry, opening a new trade rift between Brussels and Beijing.

Aware of these risks, China is wooing developing countries. These countries still have sizable but often aging manufacturing sectors that provide an opening for exports from newly built, highly efficient factories in China. Many developing countries are struggling to renegotiate large debts owed to Beijing for infrastructure projects, which puts them in a weak position to raise tariffs on Chinese goods.

China’s factories have been gaining dominance for decades. The country’s share of global manufacturing has grown nearly five times, to 31 percent, since 2000, according to data from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The United States’ share has tumbled to 16 percent, while the share of developing countries not including China has stayed level at 19 percent.

 

Of course, one thing isn’t changing in China’s approach: its reliance on borrowing to fuel growth.

Officials have tried repeatedly for years to tame its debt addiction. Liu He, a vice premier, promised in a speech in 2018 that it would happen within three years.

 
Image
 

People packing red tomatoes with white boxes behind them.

Inside the Weifang produce market.Credit...Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times
 
 

People packing red tomatoes with white boxes behind them.

Instead, local government debt has surged since 2020, reaching nearly $8 trillion last year, and the semi-independent borrowing units of local governments have accumulated trillions of dollars more in loans. China’s overall debt has ballooned until it is considerably larger, relative to the country’s economic output, than debt in the United States and many other developed countries.

Yao Yang, the director of the National School of Development at Peking University, said in September that debt control efforts had not succeeded.

“Between 2014 and 2018, which should have been a window for defusing debt, the debt skyrocketed; the situation became worse after 2020,” he said in a speech. “This indicates that previous debt-defusing measures were ineffective and, in some cases, counterproductive.”

Siyi Zhao contributed research.

Keith Bradsher is the Beijing bureau chief for The Times. He previously served as bureau chief in Shanghai, Hong Kong and Detroit and as a Washington correspondent. He has lived and reported in mainland China through the pandemic.

登录后才可评论.