1）科州的裁决及缅因州的决定都是以美国宪法Section 3 of the 14th Amendment（第14修正案第三款关于禁止支持或参加叛乱的人获得公职）为根据. 川普有没有煽动叛乱不同立场的人有不同的结论. 这显然也是分裂美国众多的争议之一. 川普有众多的刑事官司在身，其中之一是联邦特别检察官Jack Smith 起诉川普企图推翻2020年总统选举结果的违法行为. 1月6日冲击国会是这件官司控辩双方必然要面对的焦点之一. 这件官司还没有进入审判阶段. 所以在法律层面上川普现在还没有被法律判定有判乱罪. 现在就禁止川普参选，显得理由不足. 毕竟无罪推定，Innocent Until Proven Guilty是一个法治社会最起码的标志.
相信联邦最高法院的judge们正在working on it. 在美国，只有宪法/法律，而不是政治，才是真正的挡箭牌。
"Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection and Other Rights
Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”
