The American people need to speak out therefore and tell their politicians; that the US China issue is too important to be left to political grandstanding in that they should step back and ask what is in the long-term interest of the United States and stop just trying to score political points against China.
因此，美国人民需要大声疾呼，告诉他们的政客，中美问题太重要了，不能沦为政治哗众取宠的对象；他们应该退一步，问问自己什么才符合美国的长远利益，而不要只是试图在政治上攻击中国。
Thanks for your serious reply. But, you are harmed by democracy in granting Gov-power to social garbage. 澤倫斯基 is killer in killing own people, Please Google my articles by keywords below: creaders The origin of civilization & rescue from dooming creaders Human animal instincts dehumanized good democracy
I have sent above articles to Kishore and many others to save the world by adding a civil legislature as patch to make up for the flaw of Kishore, but all were useless; so that I believed them to talkatively sell their noble character of kindness as business.
Sweden, once the best country in Europe, with high-quality people, a wealthy and safe society, is now ruined by democracy and its valueless values to be a society controlled by gangs. Please Google my article to understand why China is developed the best and all Western countries are ruined.
马凯硕：美是财阀政治不利与中国竞争 Kishore Mahbubani：The U.S. is plutocratic, not conducive to competing with Chinahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bVvSJFxfEw
美国国会议员在中美竞争问题上表现得非常不负责任，因为他们没有试图仔细分析整个情况，搞清楚美国的长期利益是什么，以及如何推进美国的这些长期利益，这将是美国和中国内部竞争与合作的混合体，相反，他们纯粹是为了在国内获得政治分数，我认为如果你牺牲自己国家的利益，与中国建立一种清醒而疯狂的关系，而是为了在国内获得政治分数，以提升你的个人事业，那么你的行为就是不负责任的，所以我认为美国人民需要站出来，告诉他们的政客，中美问题太重要了，不能留给政治哗众取宠，他们应该退一步，问问什么才是美国的长期利益别再试图在中国身上捞取政治利益了。我可以理解为什么美国政客为了赢得美国人民的支持，会说这是民主和专制之间的较量，当然在英语中，民主总是好的，专制总是很糟糕，所以他们想把它描绘成一个简单的黑白分明的东西。
我的书《中国赢了》已经被翻译成中文，在中国卖得很好。我在第 7 章中解释说，这不是民主和专制之间的较量，而是美国富豪统治之间的较量，美国的公共政策决策不是为了造福广大民众，而是为了造福一小部分人，即最富有的 10% 和最富有的 20%，这就是为什么美国底层 50% 的人口的生活水平几十年来都没有提高，我认为富豪统治是在与中国的精英统治打交道时，美国处于竞争劣势，因为在中国，领导人是根据他们的经验和他们管理省份、城市等的能力来选拔的，因此，在这种竞争中，精英统治者非常努力地提高自己人民的生活水平，而富豪统治者只关心提高最富有的 20% 人的福利，这是精英统治系统相对于富豪统治系统的竞争优势。
美国人应该退一步反思一下，问问自己，这怎么会在美国出现，你知道，当谈到富豪统治时，美国有很多知识上的不诚实，因为美国人认为你应该直言不讳，如果你应该直言不讳，你就应该直言不讳财阀政治就是财阀政治，但这当然会违背政客的政治利益，因此，没有一位美国政客敢说美国已经成为了财阀政治，因为从某种程度上来说，美国国会应该为财阀政治的形成负责，因为美国国会从富豪手中收钱，制定有利于富豪的政策，因此，由于美国国会是造成财阀政治的部分原因，因此他们不愿意公开、清晰地讨论这个问题，而这将使美国处于竞争劣势。
the United States Congressman are behaving very irresponsibly on the US China
contest； because they instead of trying to carefully analyze the whole picture and figur out what are you what
are the long-term interests of the
United States and how to advance these
long-term interests in United States
which will be a mixture of
competition and cooperation within us
and China instead they purely engaged in
scoring political points
domestically and I think if you
sacrifice your country's national
interests in having a sober insane
relationship with China uh in favor of
scoring domestic political points for to
enhance your personal career you're
behaving irresponsibly so I think the American people need to speak out therefore and tell their
politicians that the US China issue is
too important to be left to political
grandstanding uh in that they they
should step back and ask what is in the
long-term interest of the United States
and stop just trying to score political
points against China I can understand
why uh American politicians in an effort to win over support of the American people uh say oh this is a contest between democracy and autocracy and of course in the English language democracy is always good
autocracy is always very bad so they
would like to portray it as a simple
black and white thing but in my book has
China won which has actually been
translated and sold very well in China I
explain in Chapter 7 that this is not a contest between
democracy and autocracy this is a contest between
plutocracy in the United States of
America where public policy decisions
are made not to benefit the population
at large but the public policy decisions
are made to benefit a small sector of
the population the top 10% top 20% and
that's why uh the standard of living of
the bottom 50% of the America's
population hasn't gone up in several
decades and I and I think a plutocracy is therefore at a competitive disadvantage when it has to deal with a
meritocracy in China because in China
the leaders are selected uh on the basis of their
experience and their ability uh to run provinces to run
cities and so on so forth so therefore
in in this sort of contest where the
meritocracy is working very hard to
improve the standard of living uh of his
own people whereas the plutocracy is
only interested in enhancing the uh
benefits for the top 20% this is a competitive Advantage for a meritocratic system over a plutocratic system and
Americans should step back and reflect
on this and ask themselves how did this
put Ry emerge in the United States of
America and as you know uh there is a lot of intellectual
dishonesty in America when it comes to
discussing the plutocracy because the
Americans believe that you should call a
spade a spade right and if you you
should call a spade a spade you should
call a plutocracy a plutocracy but of course this uh this
would go against the political interest
of the politician and therefore no
politician in America dares to suggest
that America has become a plutocracy
because in some ways it is the US
Congress that is responsible for the creation of a
plutocracy because the US Congress takes
money from very wealthy people to shape
policies that will benefit the very
wealthy people and so since the US
Congress is part of the problem in the
creation of plutocracy they are are
reluctant to discuss it clearly and
openly and that's going to be a competitive disadvantage for the United States
