一位曾在中国武汉研究实验室工作的美国科学家表示，Covid是从该设施泄漏的“人为病毒”。据纽约邮报引用驻美国研究员安德鲁·赫夫（
Andrew Huff）在英国报纸《太阳报》上的声明报道，两年前，新冠病毒是从武汉病毒学研究所 （WIV）
外泄，这是一家国营资助的研究机构。
流行病学家安德鲁·哈夫在他的最新著作《武汉的真相》（The Truth About
Wuhan）中声称，这场疫情大流行是由美国政府资助在中国制造的冠状病毒引起的。
据纽约邮报报道，安德鲁·赫夫是总部设在纽约的研究传染病的非营利组织生态健康联盟（EcoHealth
Alliance）的前副总裁。
安德鲁·赫夫声称，中国的实验是在安全措施不足的情况下进行的，导致武汉实验室发生病毒泄漏。他在书中指出，外国实验室没有适当的控制措施来确保适当的生物安全和风险管理，最终导致武汉病毒研究所的实验室泄漏。
流行病学家安德鲁·哈夫出版最新著作《武汉的真相》。（取自网络）
他再曝Covid是人为病毒 美资助中国实验室肇祸
文章来源: 自由时报 于
- 新闻取自各大新闻媒体，新闻内容并不代表本网立场！
縱橫客 发表评论于
真相信事實？中国自己早就默认了，2020年头几个月连续发布的生物实验室动物管理条例，还有生物安全法，如果没出大问题怎么会正好那个时间点急匆匆弄这些法规出台。可惜卻晚了。忘羊補牢不是不對，而已經擴散於武漢生鮮市場，源於武漢處大陸中心要衝，四通八達，按忠心與否提拔上位的共黨官員們又匱乏防疫等基本知識的修養，還打壓爆料的醫生李某，很快造成不可控制的全國擴散。事情就這麼簡單明了！案發地點、起源地是洗不干淨的！
文城五毛們忙著用什麼反華、反中去‘政治洗地’，甩鍋美國，是沒有辦法的辦法，諸位很容易看清楚的。從反面告訴大家，犯罪的政府和機構是誰！
文城五毛們忙著用什麼反華、反中去‘政治洗地’，甩鍋美國，是沒有辦法的辦法，諸位很容易看清楚的。從反面告訴大家，犯罪的政府和機構是誰！
凿泥壁虎岩 发表评论于
武汉病毒就是中共病毒。世界上的大瘟疫十之八九，爆发地就是发源地。这是中共的生化武器泄露。
tudoutudou99 发表评论于
是个狠角色，他的推特。
Below is link to the copy of the report about the REAL Origin of SARS-CoV2 sent to the US Senate and Congress last week.
My declaration in the document was provided under oath with penalty of perjury.
呼叫蛮缠的人挺多，把自己身家性命压上的，还是第一次见到。
Below is link to the copy of the report about the REAL Origin of SARS-CoV2 sent to the US Senate and Congress last week.
My declaration in the document was provided under oath with penalty of perjury.
呼叫蛮缠的人挺多，把自己身家性命压上的，还是第一次见到。
zzbb-bzbz 发表评论于
没有新证据出现，美国的又一次强行甩锅而已
难为 发表评论于
撒播病毒再搞疫苗外交，赢两次。
技术员 发表评论于
编一个故事花了三年。
shanghai70 发表评论于
美国是不是参与研究，或者给没给钱都不是研讨为什么会流行的原因。这个级别的研究所完全应该可以胜任这类病毒的研究，即便这类研究没有必要也不应该泄漏。看看现在共产党领导的科学认知能力，其实发生武毒所泄漏是可悲的必然事件
好奇心想象力 发表评论于
太不要碧莲了楼下。美国参与研制武汉病毒了吗？！
OctMonkey 发表评论于
就想看赵立坚华春莹这俩无耻之徒以后换了主子后的下场，太不要脸了，成天睁眼说瞎话，撒泼骂街，实足一对男女二流子。
雅戈 发表评论于
有人记得川b和习b在疫情初期第一次一对一通话，内容到现在都没有人知道。两个b是不是那时候就知道咋回事了？
unanimous 发表评论于
美国给了武汉病毒研究所2.8 million 美金， 在2018视察时候， 发现武汉病毒研究所管理混乱， 病毒很可能泄露.
不要拿我的饭盒 发表评论于
功友
counterclockwise 发表评论于
EcoHealth Alliance Statement Regarding Book by Andrew Huff
RE: Publication of Andrew Huff’s The Truth About Wuhan
December 5, 2022
Andrew Huff, a former employee of the EcoHealth Alliance, has published a book entitled The Truth About Wuhan: How I Uncovered the Biggest Lie in History. According to press reports, Mr Huff claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of a lab leak from research conducted by the Wuhan Institute of Virology in collaboration with EcoHealth Alliance.
Mr. Huff is entitled to his own opinions, but not to his own facts. The actual “truth about Wuhan” is:
1) Mr. Huff was employed by the EcoHealth Alliance from 2014 to 2016. However, reports that he worked at or with the Wuhan Institute of Virology during that time are untrue. He was assigned to a completely different project working on computer-based algorithms to assess emerging disease threats.
2) Mr. Huff alleges that EcoHealth Alliance was engaged in gain of function research to create SARS-CoV-2. This is not true.
3) Mr. Huff makes a number of other speculations and allegations about the nature of the collaboration between EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Given that he never worked at or with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, his assertions along these lines cannot be trusted.
4) Mr. Huff claims that SARS-CoV-2 emerged as a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology based on research conducted there on bat coronaviruses and, further, that this research was related to U.S. intelligence gathering efforts. This is not true.
Dr. Francis Collins, then Director of the U. S. National Institutes of Health issued the following statement on October 20, 2021: “NIH wants to set the record straight on NIH-supported research to understand naturally occurring bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, funded through a subaward from NIH grantee EcoHealth Alliance. Analysis of published genomic data and other documents from the grantee demonstrate that the naturally occurring bat coronaviruses studied under the NIH grant are genetically far distant from SARS-CoV-2 and could not possibly have caused the COVID-19 pandemic. Any claims to the contrary are demonstrably false.
The scientific evidence to date indicates that the virus is likely the result of viral evolution in nature, potentially jumping directly to humans or through an unidentified intermediary animal host. Historically, many viruses have emerged from animals to cause epidemics and pandemics, including influenza, Ebola, Zika, West Nile fever, SARS, and more. Importantly, after an intensive investigation, agencies in the U.S Intelligence Community agreed that the virus was not developed as a biological weapon and most agencies assessed that SARS-CoV-2 most likely was not genetically engineered.”
******nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/statement-misinformation-about-sars-cov-2-origins
5) Mr. Huff argues that the origin of COVID-19 is definitely due to a lab leak, yet he provides no scientific evidence to support his case. To the contrary, the emerging consensus, based on peer-reviewed scientific evidence, is that COVID-19 originated through zoonotic spillover. Substantial published scientific evidence indicates that COVID-19 originated via a similar pathway to SARS, involving a spillover from bats to intermediate animal hosts, then to people within the wildlife trade, leading to the first known cluster in the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. The hypothesis that SARS-COV-2 was created in a laboratory is now widely considered less probable than emergence via the wildlife trade. A recent report by the Independent Task Force on COVID-19 and Other Pandemic Origins, Prevention, and Response, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, reviews the considerable peer-reviewed literature and concludes that the preponderance of the evidence is most consistent with COVID-19’s origin as a zoonotic infection within the wildlife trade. While a lab leak cannot be absolutely ruled out, the Independent Task Force found no verifiable and credible evidence or scientific data to support this interpretation.
Here is the link to the PNAS paper and its supplement (see Table S6) containing links to all of the available published (and some unpublished) evidence on COVID-19 origins: ******pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2202871119 .
RE: Publication of Andrew Huff’s The Truth About Wuhan
December 5, 2022
Andrew Huff, a former employee of the EcoHealth Alliance, has published a book entitled The Truth About Wuhan: How I Uncovered the Biggest Lie in History. According to press reports, Mr Huff claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of a lab leak from research conducted by the Wuhan Institute of Virology in collaboration with EcoHealth Alliance.
Mr. Huff is entitled to his own opinions, but not to his own facts. The actual “truth about Wuhan” is:
1) Mr. Huff was employed by the EcoHealth Alliance from 2014 to 2016. However, reports that he worked at or with the Wuhan Institute of Virology during that time are untrue. He was assigned to a completely different project working on computer-based algorithms to assess emerging disease threats.
2) Mr. Huff alleges that EcoHealth Alliance was engaged in gain of function research to create SARS-CoV-2. This is not true.
3) Mr. Huff makes a number of other speculations and allegations about the nature of the collaboration between EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Given that he never worked at or with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, his assertions along these lines cannot be trusted.
4) Mr. Huff claims that SARS-CoV-2 emerged as a lab leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology based on research conducted there on bat coronaviruses and, further, that this research was related to U.S. intelligence gathering efforts. This is not true.
Dr. Francis Collins, then Director of the U. S. National Institutes of Health issued the following statement on October 20, 2021: “NIH wants to set the record straight on NIH-supported research to understand naturally occurring bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, funded through a subaward from NIH grantee EcoHealth Alliance. Analysis of published genomic data and other documents from the grantee demonstrate that the naturally occurring bat coronaviruses studied under the NIH grant are genetically far distant from SARS-CoV-2 and could not possibly have caused the COVID-19 pandemic. Any claims to the contrary are demonstrably false.
The scientific evidence to date indicates that the virus is likely the result of viral evolution in nature, potentially jumping directly to humans or through an unidentified intermediary animal host. Historically, many viruses have emerged from animals to cause epidemics and pandemics, including influenza, Ebola, Zika, West Nile fever, SARS, and more. Importantly, after an intensive investigation, agencies in the U.S Intelligence Community agreed that the virus was not developed as a biological weapon and most agencies assessed that SARS-CoV-2 most likely was not genetically engineered.”
******nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/statement-misinformation-about-sars-cov-2-origins
5) Mr. Huff argues that the origin of COVID-19 is definitely due to a lab leak, yet he provides no scientific evidence to support his case. To the contrary, the emerging consensus, based on peer-reviewed scientific evidence, is that COVID-19 originated through zoonotic spillover. Substantial published scientific evidence indicates that COVID-19 originated via a similar pathway to SARS, involving a spillover from bats to intermediate animal hosts, then to people within the wildlife trade, leading to the first known cluster in the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. The hypothesis that SARS-COV-2 was created in a laboratory is now widely considered less probable than emergence via the wildlife trade. A recent report by the Independent Task Force on COVID-19 and Other Pandemic Origins, Prevention, and Response, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, reviews the considerable peer-reviewed literature and concludes that the preponderance of the evidence is most consistent with COVID-19’s origin as a zoonotic infection within the wildlife trade. While a lab leak cannot be absolutely ruled out, the Independent Task Force found no verifiable and credible evidence or scientific data to support this interpretation.
Here is the link to the PNAS paper and its supplement (see Table S6) containing links to all of the available published (and some unpublished) evidence on COVID-19 origins: ******pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2202871119 .
tsingdao355 发表评论于
所以还是美国政府资助的研究
雅典娜 发表评论于
专门真对中国的说法是无稽之谈，当年和美国合作搞同类研究的不止中国一个，但中国是相当积极，大干快上，同期建了好几个高级别实验室。这件事让美国吃了个教训。也给所有国家一个机会看清中共的嘴脸，甩锅种种，国人也逐渐意识到自己实际上是没有人权的
好奇心想象力 发表评论于
为了推卸病毒责任，中共欲举全国之力拉美国下水，美国一巴掌扇死这个邪恶政权。
Gooddevil 发表评论于
中美一起研制的
笨傻痴呆戆 发表评论于
作弊败上台查90天给报告，然后不了了之，早知美国赞助中国研究，MLGB死几百万白死，真的想宰了这帮祸害！！！！
zipzoomfly18 发表评论于
至于是泄漏的还是有意放出来的，只能说这个病毒放出来是为了把川普拉下台的
zipzoomfly18 发表评论于
病毒是中美合作的结晶，就像那个中国科学家搞的编辑dna婴儿一样-美国不能搞，放到中国来搞
gnyd 发表评论于
美国资助武汉研究新冠病毒，目的就是让新冠有一天在中国扩散。希望大家转告中国政府，不可以让美国人在中国境内合作或资助任何病毒研究项目。我早就怀疑新冠病毒是美国对中国发起的生物战。
seator 发表评论于
其实中国自己早就认了，2020年头几个月连续发布的生物实验室动物管理条例（好像是叫这个名字吧）还有生物安全法，如果没出大问题怎么会正好那个时间点弄这些法规
吃饱了找事干 发表评论于
大家心知肚明，所以中美政府对溯源都会抵触，或明或暗。最后只能打一仗，所有的责任全部推给败方。
rogersune 发表评论于
新冠Covid-19 是从武汉病毒研究所泄露出来的，这是没有疑问的。中国政府和美国政府都有责任。中国对病毒研究所管理不善，美国不应该资助与中国合作的病毒研究。
雅典娜 发表评论于
不是新闻。功能增强性研究在奥巴马任内叫停了，因为涉及道德问题。从那以后美国本土的研究就停了。但曾与美国合作研究的中方一直没停，还不断发表论文。泄露不是故意的，但掩盖是故意的。
相信事实 发表评论于
和床铺一样，就是拿不出任何证据，却信口雌黄。
Capitaltwo 发表评论于
作者用事实试图证明病毒原自美国。
蓝山秋色之红叶静美 发表评论于
Omicron是偶然病毒变化出来的，不是人造的，应该是上帝为了可怜普通人吧。否则就只有大陆的独裁下才能生存了。
红米2015 发表评论于
我倒希望Omicron是人造的。要是人类有这能力，以后就不怕再有新病毒爆发了。
老寓公 发表评论于
不是新闻了， 武汉疫情一开始包子就发指示要做好实验室的安全工作。
锦西 发表评论于
石正丽，门清。不知道她现在，此时此刻，在想些什么？
zzbb-bzbz 发表评论于
美国在世界各国建立生化实验室的目的是为了什么
FollowNature 发表评论于
本人认为武汉研究所没有能力改造病毒。根据已经发表在美国科学院学报及自然杂志上的文章，最早改变病毒增强功能的研究是美国北卡大学的实验室。武汉所的人有合作。
zhangten 发表评论于
回复：‘èå¤§ç² å表è¯è®ºäº 2022-12-05 15:19:51
ç¾å½æ¯èµå©ä½ ç 究ç æ¯ä»ä¸å¾å°ç¥è¯ï¼ä»èé ç¦äºäººç±»ï¼ä½ä½ å´éæ¾äºç æ¯ãæ以æ¦æ¯æåºè¯¥æ¿æ 责任ï¼è½ç¶æä¸è®¤ä¸ºè¿æ¯æ ææ为ã’
**================**
泄漏病毒不是故意的，掩盖泄漏却是故意的
ç¾å½æ¯èµå©ä½ ç 究ç æ¯ä»ä¸å¾å°ç¥è¯ï¼ä»èé ç¦äºäººç±»ï¼ä½ä½ å´éæ¾äºç æ¯ãæ以æ¦æ¯æåºè¯¥æ¿æ 责任ï¼è½ç¶æä¸è®¤ä¸ºè¿æ¯æ ææ为ã’
**================**
泄漏病毒不是故意的，掩盖泄漏却是故意的
shanghai70 发表评论于
本来就是这样，呜毒所闯祸，应该付全责，但项目背后有美国资金，习包子吃准了美国哑巴吃黄连，放战狼到处乱咬人。闯祸的还是武毒所不是？就跟那些特斯拉刹车失灵的闯祸驾驶维权一样德行
不允许的笔名 发表评论于
福奇就是病毒界的库克，武毒所就是病毒界的富士康。
燕麦禾儿 发表评论于
作吧！总有一天，人类会毁在自己手里！
nyfan 发表评论于
命运共同体啊
fll2012 发表评论于
这是最合理的解释
深不可测 发表评论于
美国人出钱， 中国人出力，谁都跑不了。
bluetag 发表评论于
不论哪国的科学家，都昧着良心否认病毒出自实验室，因为怕影响自己以后的研究经费，知识越多越反动还是有一定道理的。
ca_lowhand 发表评论于
任何生化实验室事故，实验室都是第一直接责任人。美国卫生部是出钱的甲方，是间接责任人。
西湖孤山 发表评论于
哎，我早就说了，这东西是人造的。
小米干饭 发表评论于
中国美国，哥俩好啊！
一条绳上的蚂蚱，跑不了啊！
一条绳上的蚂蚱，跑不了啊！
tudoutudou99 发表评论于
老大第一时间派陈薇将军去洗地，这英明决定挽救了中国。要是全世界的冤魂都找中共索赔，这还不要了老大的命？
Lacedaemon 发表评论于
问题不在病毒是哪里来的。美国还控制着天花病毒呢。关键是泄露后一系列的掩盖，打压，嫁祸和混淆事实。这些都是中国政府干的。
mark999_2020 发表评论于
这不是明摆着说病毒的源头在美国吗？
GP2X 发表评论于
到实验室泄露时，的确算事故，中美责任至少对半儿开。但长期隐瞒，“人不传人”，贿赂WHO，甚至在武汉已经封城后还不停止国际航班，故意全世界放毒，那就已经不是事故了。
Panda-2020 发表评论于
大家都知道 病毒的源头是美国
true? 发表评论于
病毒出现后，全世界的科学家，不分国籍，全都否认病毒是人造的。所以真实情况很可能是大家都参与都有责任。
不过谁负主要责任呢？如果特斯拉的电车出故障，负主要责任、要赔钱的的应该是马斯克和高管们，而不是工厂的工人。
不过谁负主要责任呢？如果特斯拉的电车出故障，负主要责任、要赔钱的的应该是马斯克和高管们，而不是工厂的工人。
竞选 发表评论于
疫情首次在武汉爆发，病毒首次在武汉被检测到，武汉爆发疫情时全世界其它地方既没有发现新冠病人也没有检测到病毒。
这些都是大家都认可的事实。
这些都是大家都认可的事实。
ca_lowhand 发表评论于
这个是最有可能符合事实的推断
三棵树 发表评论于
和我猜想的相同，真相應該就是這樣。
Bslrim 发表评论于
又不是新闻，早就知道了，所以中美互相指责对方
roliepolieolie 发表评论于
谁都知道是武毒所泄漏的
阿拉丙 发表评论于
既然是副总裁，证据呢？
没有证据靠嘴说会有人承认吗？
没有证据靠嘴说会有人承认吗？
lurenjia2014 发表评论于
不是在海鲜市场爆发的吗？病毒怎么传到海鲜市场的？
有待 发表评论于
美国人出钱， 中国人出力，谁都跑不了。
查看更多评论