但我想说的还不是这个，因为最大的川粉马斯克是个吸大麻和麻醉剂的人（他自己说的哈）。听说他搬到了德州，而德州吸麻是不合法的。那么马斯克麻瘾上来时，如果他在德州吸，那么他就fall under Penal code 31.03, 德州应该抓他（会不会抓我不知道，但按你们川粉的说法，是必须要抓的）。如果他不在德州吸，那么他就必须跑回加州或其它吸麻合法的州。Do you not find it hypocritical and ironic? What do you say? Would you still criticize CA's penal codes? Do you think he should be arrested in TX if he smokes weed there? 啊哈哈哈哈哈哈。
athena58 发表评论于 2024-10-07 20:18:16
柳小波网友，不好意思哈，不过您给的理由就不如蓝靛厂网友的有说服力了。
首先，我个人是反对Prop 47的。我和川粉的分歧不是在Prop 47是好还是不好，而是在加州 vs 德州的 Penal Code 31.03. 我从来没有说过立法不立法没差别，立法当然有差别。不过这不是我们争论的东西，我们争论的是如果你们批评加州的Prop 47，为什么不批评德州的同样的法律，德州同样的法律的上限差不多是加州的三倍。蓝靛厂网友的论点是两个州的都不好，所以不是法律制定的问题，而是检察官的问题。这个比较有说服力。
然而，我去查了一下两州的crime rates，有很多报告比较，我选一个比较中间的，即Statista或Wikipedia, 上面说In 2022, California reported 1,109,452 property and violent crimes, the most out of any state. Texas followed behind with 820,362 reported crimes。虽然加州比德州高一些，但德州比加州少了近一千万人，而面积却是加州的1.7倍，所以其实折算起来，这两个州在crime rate上应该都差不多。从这个角度看，singling out CA's DA but ignore TX's does not seem fair. What do you say?
Injecting excessive liquidity into an economy facing supply chain constraints inevitably leads to inflation. This is basic economics 101. Both Trump and Biden share responsibility for the current inflation; Trump contributed significantly more funding to the economy than Biden did. That said, under Biden, US achieved the seemingly impossible soft landing, record economical growth, record oil production, and record employment. 懂了吗？
On another note, the withdrawal from Afghanistan was a painful but necessary decision. It's hard to say if anyone could have handled it better given the circumstances. It’s also worth noting that more U.S. service members lost their lives in Afghanistan under Trump than under Biden, which is a well-documented fact. 懂了吗？
The 2014 proposition modified, but did not eliminate, sentencing for many nonviolent property and drug crimes. It doesn’t mean, like that Facebook post is saying, that you’re not prosecuted or that you aren’t committing a crime. In fact, most shoplifting was already prosecuted as a misdemeanor anyway. What Prop 47 did is increase the dollar amount by which theft can be prosecuted as a felony from $400 to $950 to adjust for inflation and cost of living,” Bastian said. “But most shoplifting cases are under $400 dollars to begin with, so before Prop 47 and after Prop 47, there isn’t any difference.
请注意，这里强调说少于950元的犯罪并不是没有被执行，而且Prop 47前后在执行方面并没有不同，唯一不同的是因为上限提高到950元，有了更多的misdemeanor charge而已（instead of felony)
