旧电脑 发表评论于 2024-12-20 10:21:29
可以参考一下恐怖主义的定义，“the use of violence or the threat of violence to achieve political or ideological goals, usually against non-combatants”。大概没人会认为枪手是无罪的，只是希望这场审判能让大家思考，如何能避免这种悲剧再次发生。
==================================
认为无罪的都是底层、不懂法律、没啥见识的，类似于民科，他们只能在网上瞎嚷嚷，最终判决和这些人的看法没有任何关系
可以参考一下恐怖主义的定义，“the use of violence or the threat of violence to achieve political or ideological goals, usually against non-combatants”。大概没人会认为枪手是无罪的，只是希望这场审判能让大家思考，如何能避免这种悲剧再次发生。
每天美国发生多少起谋杀案件？哪件不恐怖？为什么杀死大量无辜平民的拉斯维加斯大屠杀不是恐怖主义？为什么多次校园屠杀儿童的枪击案不是恐怖主义？在没有旁人的地方只杀了一个CEO就成了恐怖主义了？
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Very good question!!!
The DA has a very high wager in this case that can determine his political career.
Even when there is no death penalty in NY, 1st degree murder may be difficult to pass jury. Because there can be no double jeopardies, he has to make a decision whether to pursue a safer charge.
