Household income in the United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Household income in the United States is a measure of current private income commonly used by the United States government and private institutions. To measure the income of a household, the pre-tax money receipts of all residents over the age of 15 are combined. Most of these receipts are in the form of wages and salaries (before withholding and other taxes), but many other forms of income, such as unemployment insurance, disability, child support, etc., are included as well. The residents of the household do not have to be related to the householder for their earnings to be considered part of the household's income.[1] While the use of household income remains among the most widely accepted as households tend to share a common economic fate, the size of a household which is commonly not considered may off-set gains in household income.[2]
In 2006, the median annual household income according to the US Census Bureau was determined to be $48,201.00.[3] The median income per household member (including all working and non-working members above the age of 14) in the year 2006 was $26,036.[4] In the year 2005, there were approximately 113,146,000 households in the United States. 19.01% of all households had annual incomes exceeding $100,000,[5] 12.7% fell below the federal poverty threshold[6] and the bottom 20% earned less than $23,202.[7] The aggregate income distribution is highly concentrated towards the top, with the top 6.37% earning roughly one third of all income, and those with upper-middle incomes control a large, though declining, share of the total earned income.[8][2] Income inequality in the United States, which had decreased slowly after World War II until 1970, began to increase slowly in the 1970s, and has increased more quickly since then.[9] Households in the top quintile, 77% of which had two income earners, had incomes exceeding $91,705. Households in the mid quintile, with a mean of one income earner per household had incomes between $36,000 and 57,657.[10]
The 2006 economic survey also found that households in the top two income quintiles, those with an annual household income exceeding $60,000, had a median of two income earners while those in the lower quintiles (2nd and middle quintile) had median of only one income earner per household. Due to high unemployment among those in the lowest quintile the median number of income earners for this particular group was determined to be zero.[5] Overall the United States followed the trend of other developed nations with a relatively large population of relatively affluent households outnumbering the poor. Among those in-between the relative extremes of the income strata a large and quite powerful section of households with moderately high middle class incomes[8] and an even larger number of households with moderately low incomes.[5] While the median household income has increased 44% since 1990 it has increased only slightly when considering inflation. In 1990, the median household income was determined to be $30,056; $44,603 in 2003 dollars. While personal income has remained relatively stagnant over the past few decades, household income has risen due to the rising percentage of households with two or more income earners. Between 1999 and 2004 household income stagnated showing a slight increase since 2004.[11][12]
Contents |
[edit] Income distribution of population
| Income range | Households (thousands) | Percent | Mean number of earners | Mean household size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0 to $25,000 (28.22%) | 0 | 2 | ||
| Under $2,500 | 2,566 | 2.26% | 0.23 | 1.97 |
| $2,500 to $4,999 | 1,389 | 1.22% | 0.52 | 2.04 |
| $5,000 to $7,499 | 2,490 | 2.20% | 0.39 | 1.76 |
| $7,500 to $9,999 | 3,360 | 2.96% | 0.33 | 1.66 |
| $10,000 to $12,499 | 4,013 | 3.54% | 0.46 | 1.71 |
| $12,500 to $14,999 | 3,543 | 3.13% | 0.50 | 1.84 |
| $15,000 to $17,499 | 3,760 | 3.32% | 0.67 | 1.99 |
| $17,500 to $19,999 | 3,438 | 3.03% | 0.73 | 2.10 |
| $20,000 to $22,499 | 4,061 | 3.58% | 0.84 | 2.11 |
| $22,500 to $24,999 | 3,375 | 2.98% | 0.79 | 2.14 |
| $25,000 to $50,000 (26.65%) | 1 | 2.5 | ||
| $25,000 to $27,499 | 3,938 | 3.48% | 0.93 | 2.21 |
| $27,500 to $29,999 | 2,889 | 2.55% | 1.01 | 2.30 |
| $30,000 to $32,499 | 3,921 | 3.46% | 1.12 | 2.38 |
| $32,500 to $34,999 | 2,727 | 2.41% | 1.17 | 2.39 |
| $35,000 to $37,499 | 3,360 | 2.96% | 1.22 | 2.36 |
| $37,500 to $39,999 | 2,633 | 2.32% | 1.25 | 2.49 |
| $40,000 to $42,499 | 3,378 | 2.98% | 1.31 | 2.46 |
| National Median | $44,389 | 1.35 | 2.57 | |
| $42,500 to $44,999 | 2,294 | 2.02% | 1.38 | 2.60 |
| $45,000 to $47,499 | 2,700 | 2.38% | 1.39 | 2.60 |
| $47,500 to $49,999 | 2,371 | 2.09% | 1.49 | 2.62 |
| $50,000 to $75,000 (18.27%) | 2 | 3 | ||
| $50,000 to $52,499 | 3,071 | 2.71% | 1.46 | 2.60 |
| $52,500 to $54,999 | 2,006 | 1.77% | 1.58 | 2.72 |
| $55,000 to $57,499 | 2,420 | 2.13% | 1.61 | 2.75 |
| $57,500 to $59,999 | 1,786 | 1.57% | 1.70 | 2.87 |
| $60,000 to $62,499 | 2,566 | 2.26% | 1.63 | 2.82 |
| $62,500 to $64,999 | 1,774 | 1.56% | 1.79 | 2.89 |
| $65,000 to $67,499 | 2,101 | 1.85% | 1.81 | 2.93 |
| $67,500 to $69,999 | 1,637 | 1.44% | 1.74 | 2.80 |
| $70,000 to $72,499 | 1,978 | 1.74% | 1.77 | 2.88 |
| $72,500 to $74,999 | 1,413 | 1.24% | 1.82 | 3.00 |
| $75,000 to $100,000 (10.93%) | 2 | 3 | ||
| $75,000 to $77,499 | 1,802 | 1.59% | 1.82 | 2.95 |
| $77,500 to $79,999 | 1,264 | 1.11% | 1.98 | 3.04 |
| $80,000 to $82,499 | 1,673 | 1.47% | 1.89 | 3.01 |
| $82,500 to $84,999 | 1,219 | 1.07% | 1.97 | 3.10 |
| $85,000 to $87,499 | 1,418 | 1.25% | 1.94 | 3.00 |
| $87,500 to $89,999 | 984 | 0.86% | 1.98 | 3.03 |
| $90,000 to $92,499 | 1,282 | 1.13% | 1.95 | 3.03 |
| $92,500 to $94,999 | 917 | 0.81% | 2.17 | 3.25 |
| $95,000 to $97,499 | 1,023 | 0.90% | 2.06 | 3.29 |
| $97,500 to $99,999 | 846 | 0.74% | 2.12 | 3.33 |
| $100,000 or more (15.73%) | 2 | 3 | ||
| $100,000 to $149,999 | 11,194 | 9.89% | ca. 2 | ca. 3 |
| $150,000 to $199,999 | 3,595 | 3.17% | ||
| $200,000 to $249,999 | 1,325 | 1.17% | ||
| $250,000 and above | 1,699 | 1.50% | ||
SOURCE: US Census Bureau, 2005[5]
[edit] Quintiles
Households are often divided into quintiles according to their gross income. Each quintile represents 20%, or one fifth, of all households.
Household type is strongly correlated with household income. Married couples are disproportionately represented in the upper two quintiles, compared to the general population of households. Cross-referencing shows that this is likely due to the presence of multiple income earners in these families. Non-family households (individuals) are disproportionately represented in the lower two quintiles. Households headed by single males are disproportionately found in the middle three quintles; single females head households concentrated in the bottom three quintiles.
The highest income households are almost ten times as likely to own their homes rather than rent, but in the lowest quintile, the ratio of owners to renters is nearly one to one.
The New York Times has used the quintiles to define class. It has assigned the quintiles from lowest to highest as lower class, lower middle class, middle class, upper middle class, and upper class.[13]
| Data | All households | Lowest fifth | Second fifth | Middle fifth | Fourth fifth | Highest fifth | Top 5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Households (in 1000s) | 113,146 | 22,629 | 22,629 | 22,629 | 22,629 | 22,629 | 5,695 |
| Lower limit | $0 | $0 | $18,500 | $34,738 | $55,331 | $88,030 | $157,176 |
| Median number of income earners | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Tenure | |||||||
| Owner occupied | 62.4% | 49.0% | 58.8% | 68.9% | 80.5% | 90.0% | 92.8% |
| Renter occupied | 29.2% | 48.3% | 39.7% | 29.9% | 18.7% | 9.6% | 6.9% |
| Type of household | |||||||
| Family households | 68.06% | 41.06% | 59.97% | 70.04% | 80.87% | 88.35% | 90.61% |
| Married couple families | 51.35% | 19.03% | 38.89% | 51.00% | 67.05% | 80.08% | 85.59% |
| Single-male family | 4.32% | 3.08% | 4.64% | 5.69% | 4.89% | 3.30% | 2.47% |
| Single-female family | 12.38% | 18.94% | 16.43% | 13.35% | 8.93% | 4.24% | 2.54% |
| Non-family households | 31.93% | 58.92% | 40.02% | 29.96% | 19.12% | 11.64% | 9.36% |
SOURCE: US Census Bureau, 2004[14]
[edit] Race
Despite advances made to lift minorities out of poverty and many African Americans and Latino Americans joining the middle class, there is still an uneven racial distribution among the income quintiles. While White Americans who were not of Hispanic descent made up roughly 75.1% of all persons in 2000,[16] 87.93% of all households in the top 5% were headed by a person who identified as being White alone. Only 4.75% of all household in the top 5% were headed by someone who identified him or herself as being Hispanic or Latino of any race,[17] versus 12.5% of persons identifying themselves as Hispanic or Latino in the general population.[16] Overall 86.01% of all households in the top two quintiles with upper-middle range incomes of over $55,331 were headed by a head of household who identified him or herself as White alone, while only 7.21% were being headed by someone who identified as being Hispanic and 7.37% by someone who idenitified as being African American or Black.[17] Overall households headed by Hispanics and African Americans or Blacks were underrepresented in the top two quintiles and overrepresented in the bottom two quintiles. Households headed by persons who identified as being Asian alone, on the other hand, were overrepresented among the top two quintiles. In the top five percent the percentage of Asians was nearly twice as high as the percentage of Asians among the general population. European-Americans were relatively even distributed throughout the quintiles only being underrepresented in the lowest quintile and slightly overrepresented in the top quintile and the top five percent.[17]
| Race | All households | Lowest fifth | Second fifth | Middle fifth | Fourth fifth | Highest fifth | Top 5% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White alone | Number in 1000s | 92,702 | 16,940 | 18,424 | 18,978 | 19,215 | 19,721 | 5,695 |
| Percentage | 81.93% | 74.87% | 81.42% | 83.87% | 84.92% | 87.16% | 87.93% | |
| Asian alone | Number in 1000s | 4,140 | 624 | 593 | 786 | 871 | 1,265 | 366 |
| Percentage | 3.65% | 2.76% | 2.26% | 3.47% | 3.84% | 5.59% | 6.46% | |
| African American or Black | Number in 1000s | 13,792 | 4,474 | 3,339 | 2,637 | 2,053 | 1,287 | 236 |
| Percentage | 12.19% | 19.77% | 14.75% | 11.65% | 9.07% | 5.69% | 1.04% | |
| Hispanic or Latino (of any race) | Number in 1000s | 12,838 | 3,023 | 3,130 | 2,863 | 1,931 | 1,204 | 269 |
| Percentage | 11.33% | 13.56% | 13.83% | 12.20% | 8.53% | 5.89% | 1.19% | |
SOURCE: US Census Bureau, 2004[17]
[edit] Education and Gender
Household income as well as per capita income in the United States rise significantly as the educational attainment increases.[19] In 2005 graduates with a Master's in Business Administration (MBA) who accepted job offers are expected to earn a base salary of $88,626. They are also expected to receive "…[a]n average signing bonus of $17,428."[20] According to the US Census Bureau persons with doctorates in the United States had an average income of roughly $81,400. The average for an advanced degree was $72,824 with men averaging $90,761 and women averaging $50,756 annually. Year-round full-time workers with a professional degree had an average income of $109,600 while those with a Master's degree had an average income of $62,300. Overall "…[a]verage earnings ranged from $18,900 for high school dropouts to $25,900 for high school graduates, $45,400 for college graduates and $99,300 for workers with professional degrees (M.D., D.O., J.D., D.D.S., or D.V.M.). [21]
Considering how education significantly enhances the earnings potential of individuals, it should come as no surprise that individuals with graduate degrees have an average per capita income exceeding the median household income of married couple families among the general population ($63,813).[21][22] Higher educational attainment did not, however, help close the income gap between the genders as the life-time earnings for a male with a professional degree were roughly forty percent (39.59%) higher than those of a female with a professionals degree. The life-time earnings gap between males and females was the smallest for those individuals holding an Associate degrees with male life-time earnings being 27.77% higher than those of females. While educational attainment did not help reduce the income inequality between men and women, it did increase the earnings potential of individuals of both sexes, greatly enabling many households with (a) graduate degree householder(s) to enter the top household income quintile.[21]
Household income also increased significantly with the educational attainment of the householder. The US Census Bureau publishes educational attainment and income data for all households with a householder who was aged twenty-five or older. The biggest income difference was between those with some college education and those who had a Bachelor's degree, with the latter making $23,874 more. Income also increased substantially with increased post-secondary education. While the median household income for a household with a household holding an Associates degree was $51,970, the median household income for those with a Bachelor's degree or higher was $73,446. Those with doctorates had the second highest median household with a median of $96,830; $18,289 more higher than that for those at the Master's degree level, but $3,170 lower than the median for households with a professionals degree holding householder.[18]
| Criteria | Overall | Less than 9th grade | High school drop-out | High school graduate | Some college | Associates degree | Bachelor's degree | Bachelor's degree or more | Master's degree | Professional degree | Doctorate degree | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median individual income | Male, age 25+ | $33,517 | $15,461 | $18,990 | $28,763 | $35,073 | $39,015 | $50,916 | $55,751 | $61,698 | $88,530 | $73,853 |
| Female, age 25+ | $19,679 | $9,296 | $10,786 | $15,962 | $21,007 | $24,808 | $31,309 | $35,125 | $41,334 | $48,536 | $53,003 | |
| Both sexes, age 25+ | $32,140 | $17,422 | $20,321 | $26,505 | $31,054 | $35,009 | $43,143 | $49,303 | $52,390 | $82,473 | $70,853 | |
| Median household income | $45,016 | $18,787 | $22,718 | $36,835 | $45,854 | $51,970 | $68,728 | $73,446 | $78,541 | $100,000 | $96,830 | |
SOURCE: US Census Bureau, 2003[18][23]
The change in median personal and household since 1991 also varied greatly with educational attainment. The following table shows the median household income according to the educational attainment of the householder. All data is in 2003 dollars and only applies to householders whose householder is aged twenty-five or older. The highest and lowest points of the median household income are presented in bold face.[18][23]
| Year | Overall Median | Less than 9th grade | High school drop-out | High school graduate | Some college | Associates degree | Bachelor's degree | Bachelor's degree or more | Master's degree | Professional degree | Doctorate degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | $40,873 | $17,414 | $23,096 | $37,520 | $46,296 | $52,289 | $64,150 | $68,845 | $72,669 | $102,667 | $92,614 |
| 1993 | $40,324 | $17,450 | $22,523 | $35,979 | $44,153 | $49,622 | $64,537 | $70,349 | $75,645 | $109,900 | $93,712 |
| 1995 | $42,235 | $18,031 | $21,933 | $37,609 | $44,537 | $50,485 | $63,357 | $69,584 | $77,865 | $98,302 | $95,899 |
| 1997 | $43,648 | $17,762 | $22,688 | $38,607 | $45,734 | $51,726 | $67,487 | $72,338 | $77,850 | $105,409 | $99,699 |
| 1999 | $46,236 | $19,008 | $23,977 | $39,322 | $48,588 | $54,282 | $70,925 | $76,958 | $82,097 | $110,383 | $107,217 |
| 2001 | $45,300 | $18,830 | $24,162 | $37,468 | $47,605 | $53,166 | $69,796 | $75,116 | $81,993 | $103,918 | $96,442 |
| 2003 | $45,016 | $18,787 | $22,718 | $36,835 | $45,854 | $56,970 | $68,728 | $73,446 | $78,541 | $100,000 | $96,830 |
| Average | $43,376 | $18,183 | $23,013 | $37,620 | $46,109 | $51,934 | $66,997 | $72,376 | $78,094 | $104,368 | $94,487 |
SOURCE: US Census Bureau, 2003[18]
[edit] Age of householder
Household income in the United States varies substantially with the age of the person who heads the household. Overall the median household income increased with the age of householder until retirement age when household income started to decline.[24] The highest median household income was found among households headed by working baby-boomers.[24] Households headed by persons between the ages of 45 and 54 had a median household income of $61,111 and a mean household income of $77,634. The median income per member of household for this particular group was $27,924. The highest median income per member of household was among those between the ages of 54 and 64 with $30,544. The group with the second highest median household income, were households headed by persons between the ages 35 and 44 with a median income of $56,785, followed by those in the age group between 55 and 64 with $50,400. Not surprisingly the lowest income group was compromised of those household headed by individuals younger than 24, followed by those headed by persons over the age of 75. Overall households headed by persons above the age of seventy-five had a median household income of $20,467 with the median household income per member of household being $18,645. These figures support the general assumption that median household income as well as the median income per member of household peaked among those households headed by middle aged persons, increasing with the age of the householder and the size of the household until the householder reaches the age of 64. With retirement income replacing salaries and the size of the household declining, the median household income decreases as well.[24]
[edit] Aggregate income distribution
The aggregate income measures the combined income earned by all persons in a particular income group. Overall all households in the United States earned roughly $4,286,391 million in 2005 (4.3 trillion). Roughly one third, 32.5%, of all income in the US was earned by those households with an income over $150,000, approximately the top five percent. Approximately one fifth, 20.58%, of all income was earned by the top 2.67%, those households earning more than $200,000 a year. Overall the aggregate income distributing tilts toward the top, despite the fact that households with middle-range annual incomes ranging from $50,000 to $75,000 earned roughly one fourth, 25.11% of all income. As the percentage of middle-range income households is roughly one-fourth of the population, this particular income group's share of income is roughly equal to their representation in the general population. The bottom 6.37%, however only earned 0.27% of all income.[5]
| Aggregate income distribution, 2005[48] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of the total income earned by each income group | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10% | 20% | 30% | 40% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| less than $25,000 | 6.76% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $25,000 to $50,000 | 18.12% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $50,000 to $75,000 | 22.54% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $75,000 to $100,000 | 20.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $100,000 or more | 32.58% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[edit] Household income over time
Please note that all figures are presented in 2003 dollars.
Since 1967, the median household income in the United States has risen by 31%, fluctuating several times. The rise in household income is largely the result of an increase in personal income among college graduates, a group that has doubled in size since the 1960s, and women entering the labor force. Today, 42% of all households have two income earners. Household income increased dramatically faster for affluent households with income inequality having increased steadily since the 1970s.[27][28]
While household income has increased, its growth has been slowed by a decrease in married-couple households who tend to have two earners and, therefore, higher incomes. While the proportion of wives working year-round in married couple households with children has increased from 17% in 1967 to 39% in 1996, the proportion of such households among the general population has decreased. This means that that the share the most economically prosperous type of household in the has been dwindling in the United States. In 1969, more than 40% of all households consisted of a married couple with children. By 1996 only a rough quarter of US households consisted of married couples with children. As a result of these changing household demographics, median household income rose relatively slow despite an ever increasing female labor force and a considerable increase in the percentage of college graduates.[29]
| “ | "From 1969 to 1996, median household income rose a very modest 6.3 percent in constant dollars... The 1969 to 1996 stagnation in median household income may, in fact, be largely a reflection of changes in the size and composition of households rather than a reflection of a stagnating economy."- John McNeil, US Census Bureau | ” |
Overall, the median household income rose from $33,338 in 1967 to an all-time high of $44,922 in 1999, and has since decreased slightly to $43,318. Decreases in household income are visible during each recession, while increases are visible during economic upturns. These fluctuations were felt across the income strata as the incomes of both, the 95th and 20th percentile were affected by fluctuations in the economy. Income in the period between 1967 and 1999 grew considerably faster among wealthier households than it did among poorer households. For example the household income for the 80th precentile, the lower threshold for the top quintile, rose from $55,265 in 1967 to $86,867 in 2003, a 57.2% increase. The median household income rose by 30% while the income for the 20th percentile (the lower threshold for the second lowest quitile) rose by only 28% from $14,002 to $17,984. As the majority of households in the top quintile had two income earners, versus zero for the lowest quintile and that the widening gap between the top and lowest quintile may largely be the reflection of changing household demographics including the addition of women to the workforce.[25][29] Household demographics are not, however, the cause of the growing gap between the top 5% and the rest of the upper quintile. The top 5% had fewer dual earner households and full-time workers than the top quintile overall. In 2003 a household in the 95th percentile earned 77.2% more than a household in the 80th percentile, compared to 60.5% in 1967, a 27.6% increase in the earnings increase discrepancy between the two groups. Overall the income of the 95th percentile grew 15.2% faster than that of the 80th, 146.8% faster than that of the median and 159.9% faster than that of the 20th percentile.[30]
Households in the top 1% experienced the by far greatest increases in household income. According to economist Janet Yellen "the growth [in real income] was heavily concentrated at the very tip of the top, that is, the top 1 percent."[31] A 2006 analysis of IRS income data by economists Emmanuel Saez at the University of California, Berkeley and Thomas Piketty at the Paris School of Economics showed that the share of income held by the top 1% was as large in 2005 as in 1928. The data revealed that reported income increased by 9% in 2005, with the mean for the top 1% increasing by 14% and that for the bottom 90% dropping slightly by 0.6%.[32]
While per-capita, disposable income has increased 469% since 1972, it has only increased moderately when inflation is considered. In 1972, disposable personal income was determined to be $4,129; $19,385 in 2005 dollars. In 2005, disposable personal income was, however, $27,640, a 43% increase.[33][34] Since the late 1990s, household income has fallen slightly. [35]
| Data | 2003 | 2000 | 1997 | 1994 | 1991 | 1988 | 1985 | 1982 | 1979 | 1976 | 1973 | 1970 | 1967 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20th percentile | $17,984 | $19,142 | $17,601 | $16,484 | $16,580 | $17,006 | $16,306 | $15,548 | $16,457 | $15,615 | $15,844 | $15,126 | $14,002 |
| Median (50th) | $43,318 | $44,853 | $42,294 | $39,613 | $39,679 | $40,678 | $38,510 | $36,811 | $38,649 | $36,155 | $37,700 | $35,832 | $33,338 |
| 80th percentile | $86,867 | $87,341 | $81,719 | $77,154 | $74,759 | $75,593 | $71,433 | $66,920 | $68,318 | $63,247 | $64,500 | $60,148 | $55,265 |
| 95th percentile | $154,120 | $155,121 | $144,636 | $134,835 | $126,969 | $127,958 | $119,459 | $111,516 | $111,445 | $100,839 | $102,243 | $95,090 | $88,678 |
SOURCE: US Census Bureau, 2004[25] (Page 44/45)
[edit] International comparison
Median household income for other countries is shown in the table below. The data for each country has been converted to US dollars using Purchasing Power Parity (obtained from the OECD).[36] Median household income in the United States remains slightly higher than in the UK and Ireland, yet lower than that of Switzerland. It is important to note that the differences in median household income between US states can be as large as those between the developed nations. The median household income of the UK, for example, is comparable to that of Florida or South Carolina, while Switzerland is comparable to New Jersey or New Hampshire.
| Country | Median household income national currency units | Year | PPP rate (OECD) | Median household income (PPP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Switzerland[49] | 95,772 CHF | 2003 | 1.76 | $54,000 |
| California, US[50] | US State | $54,000 | ||
| United States | $48,000 USD | 2006 | 1.00 | $48,000 |
| Canada [51] | $53,528 CAD | 2005 | 1.25 | $43,000 |
| New Zealand [52] | $62,556 NZD | June 2007 | 1.47 | $43,000 |
| United Kingdom [53] | £24,700 GBP | 2004 | 0.619 | $40,000 |
| Australia[54] | $53,404 AUD | 2006 | 1.39 | $38,000 |
| Ireland | ||||
