Brief history of adjective comparison in English【转贴】
The topic of adjective comparison has been discussed in general terms in most of the grammars of contemporary English (see e.g. Quirk
As is often the case with syntactic innovations in the history of English, a variety of factors has been cited as responsible. We have already noted above historians’ attribution of the development to foreign influence. At the same time others pointed to stylistic factors such as speakers’ needs for emphasis and clarity. More generally speaking, however, the loss of inflectional morphology accompanying the gradual shift in English toward a more analytical syntax provided a typology consistent with the periphrastic construction. Nevertheless, what we will show is that after the newer forms are introduced, change proceeds along a divergent track. After an initial spurt in the use of the new periphrastic type of comparison in some environments, the newer forms eventually oust the older ones completely. In other environments, however, the newer forms recede in favor of the older inflectional type. The majority of both comparative and superlative adjectives in present-day English are in fact of the inflectional type, contrary to what one might expect from the general trend in English towards a more analytical syntax.
The availability of the new periphrastic constructions also added yet one more option to the system, a hybrid form in which