我这样认为还是有些底气的,写完上面文字,看见托尼这样评价此次临床试验的结果:“quite good news."(“非常好的消息”),"clear cut positive effect in diminishing time to recover."(“对于缩短康复时间的十分明确的阳性效果“), "This will be the standard of care," (“这将会成为治疗标准”)。一向对科学问题十分小心谨慎的托尼,这些话能从他的口中说出,非常不简单。他对应用羟氯喹和阿奇霉素联合治疗新冠,就是持的观望态度。
Preliminary results indicate that patients who received remdesivir had a 31% faster time to recovery than those who received placebo (p
雅美之途 发表评论于
这段文字来自Gilead的新闻稿,他们说自己的数据只是NIH的双盲试验的补充,他们是开放的open-labeled, NIH是randomized, 这似乎说明他们是不同的临床试验?但是又有做临床试验的人告诉我他们是一回事,称这是什么“ “An independent data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) overseeing the trial met on April 27 to review data and shared their interim analysis with the study team” 。这里来Gilead新闻稿:“Merdad Parsey, MD, PhD, Chief Medical Officer, Gilead Sciences. “These study results complement data from the placebo-controlled study of remdesivir conducted by the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases and help to determine the optimal duration of treatment with remdesivir. The study demonstrates the potential for some patients to be treated with a 5-day regimen, which could significantly expand the number of patients who could be treated with our current supply of remdesivir. This is particularly important in the setting of a pandemic, to help hospitals and healthcare workers treat more patients in urgent need of care.”
hotpepper 发表评论于
NIH announcement:
Preliminary results indicate that patients who received remdesivir had a 31% faster time to recovery than those who received placebo (p
hotpepper 发表评论于
“The NIAID said Wednesday afternoon that a preliminary data analysis of the trial data from 1,063 patients found patients taking the drug recovered 31% faster than those taking the placebo. In remdesivir patients, the median time to recovery was 11 days. In placebo patients, it was 15 days.”
作者自己都没搞清楚!这已经不是第一次了,你要害怕了就删吧。