做印巴生意，我想讲讲我经历的几件事：
１） 我曾供货给一家印度公司，不长时间就被抄了后路。最后谁也没得好。不久，这家印度公司便踢了该家工厂，找到另一家大陆更便宜的工厂。我后来听说，他们不知换了多少家公司，工厂。
２）另一家是巴基斯坦公司，我们向其购货。一次我们发现其合同签字于往常不同。一问是其秘书签的。再问，本人不在，秘书不知怎么办，便先打电话，其同意先由秘书代签一下。然后补上。时间过了一段，大家也忘了。
但，不久，价格飞涨，此家公司拒绝继续供货。理由，没合同。没折上仲裁，给仲裁员看合同，但败了。原因不用说啦。看来，人家早有准备啦。
印巴不是不可，但当心再当心。
但,我有几个朋友坚决不和印巴人生意往来。犹太人确不在乎，怪了
做印巴生意，我想讲讲我经历的几件事
richman 发表评论于
do you want to go Pakistan for fight it???
HCC 发表评论于
>>>２）另一家是巴基斯坦公司，我们向其购货。一次我们发现其合同签字于往常不同。一问是其秘书签的。再问，本人不在，秘书不知怎么办，便先打电话，其同意先由秘书代签一下。然后补上。时间过了一段，大家也忘了。
但，不久，价格飞涨，此家公司拒绝继续供货。理由，没合同。没折上仲裁，给仲裁员看合同，但败了。原因不用说啦。看来，人家早有准备啦。
If the secretary signed the contract and the company performed on the contract, I don't think it matters who signed it -- as long as the company "accepted" the contract and the secretary had the authority to sign at the time, the contract should still be valid and binding.
但，不久，价格飞涨，此家公司拒绝继续供货。理由，没合同。没折上仲裁，给仲裁员看合同，但败了。原因不用说啦。看来，人家早有准备啦。
If the secretary signed the contract and the company performed on the contract, I don't think it matters who signed it -- as long as the company "accepted" the contract and the secretary had the authority to sign at the time, the contract should still be valid and binding.
登录后才可评论.
