李政道: 使用筷子能帮助你的大脑更好工作

宁静纯我心 感得事物人 写朴实清新. 闲书闲话养闲心,闲笔闲写记闲人;人生无虞懂珍惜,以沫相濡字字真。
打印 被阅读次数

李政道说,使用筷子能帮助你的大脑工作得更好,我听到他的讲座。我想问他,有任何科学证据来支持他的想法。不存在于当时的科学家没有足够的工具。

我的好奇,由于当时我开始学习如何处理叉子,刀和勺子。我想李是有道理的,如果你想想人类如何利用手的远古存活时间。大脑是最强大的生存机构。如果你让你的大脑强大,你可以生存下去!

是的,这是有道理的--现在有新的工具--有科学证据来支持李的想法 - 如果你想知道更多,你必须自己阅读的方式来支持您的大脑了。

 

Write with your hand help you process new information.

 

Tsung Dao Lee said, using chopsticks can help your brain work better, I heard in his seminar. I wanted to ask him if any scientific evidence to back up his ideas. Not at that time as scientists didn't have the tool.

I's intrigued by that as at the time i started learning how to handle forks, knift and spoon. I thought Lee made sense if you think about how human survived by using hands in far ancient time. Brain is the most powerful organ for survival. If you get your brain powered up, you could survive!

Yeah, it makes sense now with the new tool - if you like to know more, you gotta read yourself - a way to power your brain up.

 

 

What’s Lost as Handwriting Fades

Photo
 
Credit            Michael Mabry        
Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
Continue reading the main story
Continue reading the main story /*First rule for TESTING only*/ /*#sharetools_nytnow { width:96px; height:110px; overflow:hidden; border: 1px solid red; }*/ #sharetools_nytnow { text-align: left; } #sharetools_nytnow { padding-top: 6px; } #sharetools_nytnow img { padding-bottom: 6px; } #sharetools_nytnow h3 { font-family: "nyt-franklin", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; color: #333; margin:0; } #sharetools_nytnow h3 a { color: #333; text-decoration: none; } #sharetools_nytnow p { font-family: "nyt-franklin", "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 16px; color: #303030; font-weight: 200; margin:0; } #sharetools_nytnow a { color: #6187a6; text-decoration: none; display:block; margin-top: 4px; } #sharetools_nytnow a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }
Top Stories

This article and others like it are part of our new subscription.
Learn More »

Does handwriting matter?

Not very much, according to many educators. The Common Core standards, which have been adopted in most states, call for teaching legible writing, but only in kindergarten and first grade. After that, the emphasis quickly shifts to proficiency on the keyboard.

But psychologists and neuroscientists say it is far too soon to declare handwriting a relic of the past. New evidence suggests that the links between handwriting and broader educational development run deep.

Children not only learn to read more quickly when they first learn to write by hand, but they also remain better able to generate ideas and retain information. In other words, it’s not just what we write that matters — but how.

Continue reading the main story                            Related in Opinion

“When we write, a unique neural circuit is automatically activated,” said Stanislas Dehaene, a psychologist at the Collège de France in Paris. “There is a core recognition of the gesture in the written word, a sort of recognition by mental simulation in your brain.

Audio

“And it seems that this circuit is contributing in unique ways we didn’t realize,” he continued. “Learning is made easier.”

A 2012 study led by Karin James, a psychologist at Indiana University, lent support to that view. Children who had not yet learned to read and write were presented with a letter or a shape on an index card and asked to reproduce it in one of three ways: trace the image on a page with a dotted outline, draw it on a blank white sheet, or type it on a computer. They were then placed in a brain scanner and shown the image again.

The researchers found that the initial duplication process mattered a great deal. When children had drawn a letter freehand, they exhibited increased activity in three areas of the brain that are activated in adults when they read and write: the left fusiform gyrus, the inferior frontal gyrus and the posterior parietal cortex.

By contrast, children who typed or traced the letter or shape showed no such effect. The activation was significantly weaker.

Dr. James attributes the differences to the messiness inherent in free-form handwriting: Not only must we first plan and execute the action in a way that is not required when we have a traceable outline, but we are also likely to produce a result that is highly variable.

Photo

 

Karin James, a psychologist at Indiana University, used a scanner to see how handwriting affected activity in children’s brains.Credit            A. J. Mast for The New York Times        

That variability may itself be a learning tool. “When a kid produces a messy letter,” Dr. James said, “that might help him learn it.”

Our brain must understand that each possible iteration of, say, an “a” is the same, no matter how we see it written. Being able to decipher the messiness of each “a” may be more helpful in establishing that eventual representation than seeing the same result repeatedly.

“This is one of the first demonstrations of the brain being changed because of that practice,” Dr. James said.

In another study, Dr. James is comparing children who physically form letters with those who only watch others doing it. Her observations suggest that it is only the actual effort that engages the brain’s motor pathways and delivers the learning benefits of handwriting.

The effect goes well beyond letter recognition. In a study that followed children in grades two through five, Virginia Berninger, a psychologist at the University of Washington, demonstrated that printing, cursive writing, and typing on a keyboard are all associated with distinct and separate brain patterns — and each results in a distinct end product. When the children composed text by hand, they not only consistently produced more words more quickly than they did on a keyboard, but expressed more ideas. And brain imaging in the oldest subjects suggested that the connection between writing and idea generation went even further. When these children were asked to come up with ideas for a composition, the ones with better handwriting exhibited greater neural activation in areas associated with working memory — and increased overall activation in the reading and writing networks.

Photo

 

Samples of handwriting by young children. Dr. James found that when children drew a letter freehand, they exhibited increased activity in three significant areas of the brain, which didn’t happen when they traced or typed the letter.Credit            Karin James        Continue reading the main storyRecent Comments

Richard Smith21 hours ago

That's a nifty illustration accompanying this story. Nice work, Michael Mabry.

Mya21 hours ago

I have poor penmanship. I hope however that cursive is taught to my children. In college I took extensive notes in every course and earned a...

eva lockhart21 hours ago

Writing neatly, by hand is not merely an art form, important for brain function and all the other arguments...it's also necessary in...

  • See All Comments

It now appears that there may even be a difference between printing and cursive writing — a distinction of particular importance as the teaching of cursive disappears in curriculum after curriculum. In dysgraphia, a condition where the ability to write is impaired, usually after brain injury, the deficit can take on a curious form: In some people, cursive writing remains relatively unimpaired, while in others, printing does.

In alexia, or impaired reading ability, some individuals who are unable to process print can still read cursive, and vice versa — suggesting that the two writing modes activate separate brain networks and engage more cognitive resources than would be the case with a single approach.

Dr. Berninger goes so far as to suggest that cursive writing may train self-control ability in a way that other modes of writing do not, and some researchers argue that it may even be a path to treating dyslexia. A 2012 review suggests that cursive may be particularly effective for individuals with developmental dysgraphia — motor-control difficulties in forming letters — and that it may aid in preventing the reversal and inversion of letters.

Cursive or not, the benefits of writing by hand extend beyond childhood. For adults, typing may be a fast and efficient alternative to longhand, but that very efficiency may diminish our ability to process new information. Not only do we learn letters better when we commit them to memory through writing, memory and learning ability in general may benefit.

Continue reading the main story Write A Comment

Two psychologists, Pam A. Mueller of Princeton and Daniel M. Oppenheimer of the University of California, Los Angeles, have reported that in both laboratory settings and real-world classrooms, students learn better when they take notes by hand than when they type on a keyboard. Contrary to earlier studies attributing the difference to the distracting effects of computers, the new research suggests that writing by hand allows the student to process a lecture’s contents and reframe it — a process of reflection and manipulation that can lead to better understanding and memory encoding.

Not every expert is persuaded that the long-term benefits of handwriting are as significant as all that. Still, one such skeptic, the Yale psychologist Paul Bloom, says the new research is, at the very least, thought-provoking.

“With handwriting, the very act of putting it down forces you to focus on what’s important,” he said. He added, after pausing to consider, “Maybe it helps you think better.”

登录后才可评论.