谁赢了爱荷华民意调查? 看美国主流媒体如何误导

这个视频能让你更多了解一些美国主流媒体如何“公平”地报道新闻:

Ron Paul 在上星期六的IOWA州共和党初选的民意调查中获得了第二名(4671 votes),和获得第一名的明尼苏达州众议员Michele Bachman 4823 votes)仅差一百多票。按理,媒体应该用最大篇幅报道这个“茶党”的胜利。因为,Michele Bachman 被媒体称为“茶党”的女王,但是,Ron Paul 才是“茶党”的教父和大脑。近年来“茶党”运动所呼吁的,要求的,都是Ron Paul 几十年来坚持和不懈宣传,播下的种。Michele Bachman 虽然一直在严厉批评奥巴马政府的政策,但她自己所主张的原则和政策,也是积极维持现状和一些从Ron Paul 那里“借”来的观点 。只有Ron Paul 经过几十年的不懈努力,坚持原则,在美国大政府腐败横行,和华尔街勾结,欺骗,使美国经济陷入崩溃局面的今天,才使大众真正认识到了他的价值。但是,被利益集团收买的主流媒体们,采取一贯的手段,来漠视他的存在,继续边缘化这个“正气,骨气尚存”的真正的草根领袖,企图继续维持现状,维护他们自己和他们主子的利益。

Jon Stewart 的晚间节目,就是利用喜剧形式对这些媒体进行了无情的讽刺。让我们再次认识了这个“民主”制度下的所谓的自由媒体,是如何对大众进行误导。

/>

The Daily Show
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

lucy_001 发表评论于
谢谢起时戳穿主流媒体的谎言。有位善于观察的人在爱荷华共和党初选的民意调查后说:

Pawlenty 是个好人,可惜也是个标准政客。
Bachman 是个能干的骗子。
...
Ron Paul 是个你能托孤的人。

这话说到了我的心坎上了。我会尽力支持 Ron Paul 2012 的竞选, 也请有心人关注8/20( Ron Paul 的生日)的 竞选募捐, 谢谢。
lynie2003 发表评论于
虽然不能说支持RON PAUL的所有观点,但是他确实是一直坚持想法而没有朝三暮四为了选票妥协的人。记得2008年7月,因为西藏问题美国众议会投票表决谴责中国政府违反人权,他是唯一一个投了反对票的(400多支持,1票反对)。为此我对他抱有一份敬意。
起时 发表评论于
回复mehaa的评论:
thank you very much! you are doing the right thing.
起时 发表评论于
回复lucy_001的评论:
I have that book, and I read quite a lot from Mises institute, my point is that people can always make change to whatever system they bulit, especially over long period of time, generation after generation, so there is no system that would last forever.
lucy_001 发表评论于
起时, Murray Rothbard has found a better system, though I cannot be sure he was the first one. May I recommend "Democracy the God that Failed" by Hans-Hermann Hoppe? You may also like some articles at www.lewrockwell.com and www.mises.org. Thank you for your contribution to wenxue city. I've enjoyed your work.
武胜 发表评论于
Paul是政坛异数,由他来和奥巴马对决比较有意思。别看奥巴马现在民意下降,如果弄个Romney或Bachman之辈出来,我看共和党还是省省吧。
youli 发表评论于
哇 ! 大部份是英文。(连我的笔名也是英文)
起时 发表评论于
回复by水滴的评论:
I'm already dispointed by the "democracy" system, but can human find a better system?
mehaa 发表评论于
Dr. Paul has got my vote, well--my family's votes. It's just so disturbing to see that even today still there are so many people out there buying the propaganda of MSM.I am not so bullish that Dr. Paul will be elected, you simply can not underestimate the stupidity of the massive zombies.
by水滴 发表评论于
when the history scroll unfold in front of us day by day, Dr. Paul is like a knife to poke through the democratic veil to help us to see through what is behind.

I am very interested to see how "innocent" the votors are and how much the voters' brain can be washed. If Dr. Paul is not elected, I will be quite dissapointed at the so called "democracy" system.
起时 发表评论于
回复lucy_001的评论:
多谢!笔误。
lucy_001 发表评论于
Very amusing!

Would you please change the location from Ohio to Iowa? Thanks.
登录后才可评论.